Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
The Review

How to Get College Students to Vote

By Elizabeth A. Bennion and Melissa R. Michelson October 17, 2018
How to Get College Students to Vote 1
Tim Cook for The Chronicle

Younger generations make up a majority of voting-eligible adults in the United States, but they cast a minority of votes. In the last midterm elections, in 2014, only 18 percent of undergraduate and graduate students voted. Turnout rates for young people have consistently been lower than for older citizens since the Census Bureau began tracking voter turnout in 1964.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

How to Get College Students to Vote 1
Tim Cook for The Chronicle

Younger generations make up a majority of voting-eligible adults in the United States, but they cast a minority of votes. In the last midterm elections, in 2014, only 18 percent of undergraduate and graduate students voted. Turnout rates for young people have consistently been lower than for older citizens since the Census Bureau began tracking voter turnout in 1964.

With 20 million potential voters in college, campus leaders have an opportunity — actually, a civic responsibility — to boost participation of this crucial segment of the electorate. This is a two-step process. Step 1 is short term: helping students to overcome the registration barriers that exist in many states. Step 2 is long term: pursuing a year-round, campus-wide strategy for cultivating democratic engagement.

Most states require voters to register in advance of Election Day. Data suggest that classroom registration drives work to register voters and to boost voter turnout. In 2016, Elizabeth Bennion and David Nickerson published an article documenting the effects of a nationwide classroom registration experiment. The study found that registration increased by six percentage points, and voting increased by 2.6 percentage points, as a result of a 10-minute classroom-based registration drive.

The research did not reveal any statistically significant difference in the effectiveness of professor and peer presenters. Campuses can, therefore, reach prospective voters through a combination of faculty presentations and peer outreach efforts. The act of conducting the registration drive to a semi-captive classroom audience matters more than the authority of the person making the presentation. Further, the research generates the following list of best practices:

  • Conduct the registration at the beginning of class when students are paying closest attention.
  • Rather than asking students to raise their hands if they need a registration form, place forms on every student’s desk, regardless of registration status.
  • Remind students that they need to re-register if they have moved since the last time they voted and also note any recent voter purges in the state.
  • Review the forms for registration requirements (e.g. U.S. citizenship and age stipulations), while also answering common questions (e.g. whether 17-year-olds can register to vote or participate in the primary elections). State-by-state differences in registration requirements (including the pre-registration requirement itself) can also be discussed as a way to engage all students in the presentation.

The actual script is less important than the captive audience. Successful approaches have included: stating the college’s conviction that all eligible students should make their voices heard on Election Day, discussing the difficulty of creating a “representative democracy” if the majority of people don’t vote, and stressing the potential clout of young voters and explaining that their collective power will never be realized if they continue to vote at lower rates than any other age cohort.

Focusing on issues can also be a powerful motivator. Asking what issues students care about and then explaining how the offices on the ballot affect those issues can be useful in convincing new voters that politics matters to their lives.

Building registration into classrooms across campus on a voluntary basis, along with integrating it as a required component of the freshman seminar or first-year experience program, is an excellent way to ensure that all students have the time and support they need to register to vote. New-student orientation sessions and move-in days offer an opportunity to introduce voter registration when students are paying attention and actively engaging with their peers and university employees.

In 2016 Northwestern University introduced an ambitious effort in which students have one-on-one, peer-to-peer conversations with every new student, with the aim of making sure they are registered and will vote. The university built this program into every “welcome station” on student move-in day. As a result, 95 percent of students who were eligible registered to vote, either in the precincts around Northwestern or as absentee voters in their home towns. Before the program, in 2012, the university’s students had a turnout rate of 49 percent; once the program was instituted in 2016, turnout jumped to 64 percent, far exceeding the national average of 31 percent among youth and the 58 percent average among all age groups. Other campuses implementing their model are finding similar success.

Many colleges are interested in pursuing a year-round approach to shaping campus culture in ways that promote long-term civic learning and democratic engagement. Nancy Thomas and Margaret Brower introduced a “Politics 365" model that calls for “attention to improving the campus environment as a means to increasing the pervasiveness and effectiveness of student development for civic engagement, political activism, and social action.” As the name suggests, the model promotes civic learning year-round, rather than efforts that are episodic and tied narrowly to election-season efforts to mobilize student voters.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Politics 365 model is based on a 2013-2014 case study of five colleges and universities with voter turnout rates between five and 20 percentage points higher than predicted (“positive outliers”) as well as two campuses with voting rates seven percentage points (or more) lower than predicted (“negative outliers”). The goal of the project was to identify common attributes that foster political learning and engagement.

Positive-outlier campuses are characterized by strong interpersonal relationships between faculty and students, an institutional concern for student well-being, peer-to-peer support, and community support. They have a diverse student population coupled with a strong institutional commitment to promote social mobility and equal opportunity. These colleges share power and responsibility with students, treating them as valued colleagues with decision-making authority. Campus leaders also show support for political action, both during and between elections. Moreover, they are places where students, faculty, and staff exchange a diversity of perspectives, especially around policy questions and political issues.

These best practices for generating a culture of civic learning and democratic engagement are powerful tools for increasing voter turnout among college students while developing habits of political participation that extend beyond Election Day. With just a few nudges and a little leadership, college faculty and administrators can generate significant increases in student participation that allow students to make their voices heard and encourage them to take an active role in shaping their own future.

Elizabeth A. Bennion is professor of political science and director of the American Democracy Project at Indiana University at South Bend. Melissa R. Michelson is professor of political science at Menlo College, in Atherton, Calif.

A version of this article appeared in the October 26, 2018, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Opinion
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

Here’s How Colleges Can Get More Involved in Elections — and Not Just in the Midterms
Don’t Retreat. Teach Citizenship.

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin