Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Hands-On Career Preparation
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    Alternative Pathways
Sign In
The Review

If Colleges Are Dismantled, Consider the Impact on Their Cities

By Emily J. Levine October 16, 2016
If Colleges Are Dismantled,  Consider the Impact on Their Cities 1
André Da Loba for The Chronicle

Everything today is being unbundled: television, hotels, even the European Union. Some education reformers would like the university to be next. Ryan Craig, author of College Disrupted: The Great Unbundling of Higher Education, argues that disaggregation of the university’s services is a positive and inevitable process that will make the university more efficient and accessible.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Everything today is being unbundled: television, hotels, even the European Union. Some education reformers would like the university to be next. Ryan Craig, author of College Disrupted: The Great Unbundling of Higher Education, argues that disaggregation of the university’s services is a positive and inevitable process that will make the university more efficient and accessible.

Craig is not alone in seeking to parcel out a number of the university’s duties. Anant Agarwal of edX has argued that everything from admissions to food service to health care are extraneous to the institution’s central purpose. Information technology, through MOOCs or credit-bearing online courses, is key to achieving better, faster, and less costly course delivery. In the United States, online programs make university education accessible to working parents, the military, and other nontraditional students. Coursera’s new partnership with the State Department is extending that reach to refugees abroad. Much is to be gained, others have argued, from relegating to history the centuries-old association of higher education with time and place.

Yet the university has an additional purpose that is missing in these conversations and that historically played a central role — service to surrounding communities and cities. In fact, history provides a valuable lesson about what might happen if the university’s services were unbundled. And it shows that this central feature of the university would be lost — along with the local economic and cultural benefits that the university provides — if it were to be dismantled.

In the last quarter of the 19th century, even as the world became more interconnected, ascendant universities remained embedded in the cities that promoted them and benefited from their successes. From the last quarter of the 19th century to the beginning of the 20th, the fortunes of universities often rose or fell with the ability of their presidents to maintain relationships with their communities. Community support positioned a university for global prominence.

The 19th-century reformer Daniel Coit Gilman, who founded the first German-style research university in America, Johns Hopkins, in 1876, understood the delicate balance required between appealing to the desires of the community and achieving his goal of an institution with national prestige. He persuaded mid-Atlantic railroad magnates that their investment in Johns Hopkins would help the city and university thrive. Other ventures, such as Clark University, in Worcester, Mass., lacked community support, and their equally compelling entrepreneurial efforts to bring the German university model to America faltered.

Perhaps nowhere were the benefits of the reciprocal relationship between town and gown more evident than in early 20th-century New York City. Under the leadership of presidents Seth Low and Nicholas Murray Butler, Columbia University capitalized on the growth of New York to catapult to the top of American higher education, while Baltimore’s stagnant economy stalled Gilman’s ambitions for Hopkins.

Peripheral cities and towns also benefited from universities. In fact, intellectual centers that could not have developed in larger capitals were possible in peripheral cities. The Land Grant movement brought forth the “Wisconsin Idea,” the “Michigan Plan,” and other regional sources of educational pride. At the University of Wisconsin, new opportunities for civic partnerships and the democratization of knowledge epitomized the Wisconsin Idea, which integrated civic duty and applied fields into the university’s commitment to pure research.

Before we dismiss these stories as made obsolete by new kinds of learners and technologies, we need only look at the resonance of this history with current scholarship on cities and education. The urban sociologist Richard Florida has argued that universities play a key role — much larger than is usually attributed to them — in the development of technology, talent, and tolerance. However, as Florida reveals, there must be a reciprocal relationship between the university and its surroundings for both to reach their full potential. “Colleges and universities have to contribute to the regional absorptive capacity of a creative ecosystem. They need not only to generate innovations but also to absorb them.” Getting this reciprocal relationship right is delicate.

Ten years ago the challenge to the mutually beneficial relationship between the university and the city came from the globalization of the university that led to international branch campuses. Today Ryan Craig lampoons universities’ extravagant real-estate expenditures like the $8.4 million that The New York Times reported universities like Texas Tech spent on aquatics facilities. This “arm race in facilities” certainly demands scrutiny. However, this newest wave in the form of unbundling threatens to obviate the brick-and-mortar campus altogether.

With a tagline that claims “The World as Your Campus,” Minerva Schools at KGI, a San Francisco-based liberal arts college founded in 2012, holds classes online while students move between global hubs from Berlin to Buenos Aires. In announcing Coursera’s new developments at an educational-technology conference in London, one of the company’s founders, Daphne Koller, argued that most students were not “walking on lawns next to ivy-clad buildings.” This snub of the campus experience is the usual defense given for the benefits of online learning — that it is elitist and inaccessible — and will soon become a thing of the past.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, the current pattern of investing suggests otherwise. The Wall Street Journal reported recently that “in 1995, about 30 percent of all venture capital invested in the U.S. went to companies in the Bay Area. By 2015, that figure was close to 50 percent.” That is, information technology is leading to centralization and not diffusion — a fact that should give pause to those of us who work in universities in smaller cities. Not just because, as professors at San Jose State protested, we fear our teaching will become redundant — there will always be a room for great teaching — but also because without the institution of the university the communities in which many of us work won’t survive.

Ventures like Coursera and Minerva provide fodder for Kevin Carey’s The End of College, in which he writes that tomorrow’s university will be “The University of Everywhere.” In an interview about the book he suggests that in this new university the learning will happen online “interconnected over global learning networks and in organizations that in some cases aren’t colleges as we know them today, but rather 21st-century learning organizations that take advantage of all of the educational tools that are rapidly becoming available to offer great college experiences for much less money.”

Notwithstanding the prognostications of disruption, the twin forces of globalization and MOOCs have not felled the university. And in fact studies show that online programs draw a majority of enrollments from students who live less than 100 miles from the college. The local has persisted for the economic as well as cultural benefits that universities offer their communities.

The risk of unbundling is that nobody knows what held the package together, and the value it offered, until it begins to unravel. However, history reminds us that the university is more than the sum of its parts. In our efforts to achieve the goals of access and efficiency we should protect our campuses and our communities, or we might actually lose that crucial thread to the past.

Emily J. Levine is an associate professor of modern European history at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro.

A version of this article appeared in the October 21, 2016, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Opinion Online Learning
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

Reimagining College as a Lifelong Learning Experience
Why Georgetown’s Randy Bass Wants to ‘Rebundle’ College
The Outsourced College
College à la carte: The ‘unbundling’ of higher education will allow students to earn new kinds of educational credentials.

More News

Graphic vector illustration of a ship with education-like embellishments being tossed on a black sea with a Kraken-esque elephant trunk ascending from the depth against a stormy red background.
Creeping concerns
Most Colleges Aren’t a Target of Trump (Yet). Here’s How Their Presidents Are Leading.
Photo-based illustration of calendars on a wall (July, August and September) with a red line marking through most of the dates
'A Creative Solution'
Facing Federal Uncertainty, Swarthmore Makes a Novel Plan: the 3-Month Budget
Marva Johnson is set to take the helm of Florida A&M University this summer.
Leadership & governance
‘Surprising': A DeSantis-Backed Lobbyist Is Tapped to Lead Florida A&M
Students and community members protest outside of Coffman Memorial Union at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis, on Tuesday, April 23, 2024.
Campus Activism
One Year After the Encampments, Campuses Are Quieter and Quicker to Stop Protests

From The Review

Glenn Loury in Providence, R.I. on May 7, 2024.
The Review | Conversation
Glenn Loury on the ‘Barbarians at the Gates’
By Evan Goldstein, Len Gutkin
Illustration showing a valedictorian speaker who's tassel is a vintage microphone
The Review | Opinion
A Graduation Speaker Gets Canceled
By Corey Robin
Illustration showing a stack of coins and a university building falling over
The Review | Opinion
Here’s What Congress’s Endowment-Tax Plan Might Cost Your College
By Phillip Levine

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin