> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
Students
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

In a Charged Climate, Colleges Adopt Bias-Response Teams

By  Rio Fernandes
February 1, 2016

In the fall of 2006, students living in Ohio State University’s dormitories received letters espousing racist ideas, including the belief that African-Americans are intellectually inferior to white people. Around the same time, about 100 miles away, students at the university’s Agricultural Technical Institute in Wooster created a Facebook group that promoted racist views about Oprah Winfrey.

The two incidents made Ohio State officials realize they needed a proactive means to prevent occurrences of offensive speech, said Todd Suddeth, director of the university’s multicultural center. So they created a bias assessment and response team, commonly known in the world of student affairs as a BART, to help monitor and confront issues of bias on the campus.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

In the fall of 2006, students living in Ohio State University’s dormitories received letters espousing racist ideas, including the belief that African-Americans are intellectually inferior to white people. Around the same time, about 100 miles away, students at the university’s Agricultural Technical Institute in Wooster created a Facebook group that promoted racist views about Oprah Winfrey.

The two incidents made Ohio State officials realize they needed a proactive means to prevent occurrences of offensive speech, said Todd Suddeth, director of the university’s multicultural center. So they created a bias assessment and response team, commonly known in the world of student affairs as a BART, to help monitor and confront issues of bias on the campus.

Such teams are becoming more common — the University of Iowa recently became the latest major university to say it would create one. And in an era when social-media platforms are abundant (Facebook, after all, was not yet a household name in 2006), the teams can give universities a way to stay ahead of the curve in handling hateful speech that violates university rules.

Kevin Kruger, president of the student-affairs group Naspa, said the bias teams had become an even greater asset to campuses amid protests of racist symbols and speech on campuses.

“If we’ve learned something this last year,” Mr. Kruger said, “it’s the importance of campuses being both proactive and appropriately reactive” so that students understand that people are paying attention and are prepared to act when needed.

ADVERTISEMENT

What do bias-response teams do?

The teams serve two major functions: offering students a simple reporting tool when either they’re victims of bias or they notice it, and tracking reports so officials can spot problems that may be unfolding on a campus.

“We want to know the pulse of the campus,” said Jeff Knapp, who works in the counseling center and leads the BART at the University of Nebraska at Omaha. “We want an all-encompassing view of how we can make sure our students and anyone that steps on the UNO campus feel welcome.”

At larger universities like Ohio State, it would be easy for reports of bias to get lost in the shuffle, said Mr. Suddeth, who also serves as a first responder on the BART. The bias team can prevent that by centralizing the reports and making sure that all are investigated.

At Ohio State, team members monitor their email for any bias reports and deal with them as they arrive — first by following up with the sender, then by forwarding the report to the relevant department, and making sure the problem, if it needs action, is resolved. Meanwhile, the group records its reports, discerning whether they indicate larger trends that should be pursued.

ADVERTISEMENT

When troubling trends appear, team members — who might be student-affairs officers or professors — offer suggestions to administrators about possible training that could help prevent issues from getting out of hand.

Do the teams dole out discipline?

The teams are designed to react to reports of bias, not to decide punishment. If an incident violates a university’s code of conduct, the team refers the case to the campus judicial process.

Instead, the teams focus on prevention. For example, at the University of Oregon, volunteers armed with cards and information attend events — protests, for instance — that are deemed potentially upsetting and tell offended students what they can do and where they can go for help.

The blanket encouragement to report incidents has some free-speech advocates worried.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Having a culture where students are encouraged to report any instances of offensive speech to the administration, it’s just not necessarily conducive for having real free and open debates,” said Samantha Harris, director of policy research at the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, a free-speech advocacy group.

Ms. Harris added that FIRE doesn’t oppose the bias teams, but rather any policy that has the effect of chilling speech perceived as biased.

Maure Smith-Benanti, director of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender Education and Support Services at Oregon, coordinates the university’s bias-response team. She said the aim of the volunteers is not to hamper offensive speech but to counter it.

“We believe the best way to combat offensive free speech,” she said, “is with more speech.”

A version of this article appeared in the February 12, 2016, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Gender
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin