> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
News
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

In Default-Rate Data, More Fuel for Fight Over Bank-Based Lending

By  Kelly Field
September 14, 2009

The student-loan industry, which learned late Friday that its loan overhaul plan would save the government $13-billion less than legislation to end bank-based lending, got another bit of bad news on Monday, when the Education Department released its annual cohort default rates.

The data, which reflects the percentage of borrowers who entered repayment in the 2007 fiscal year and defaulted within the next two years, shows that the default rate was 2.4 percentage points higher for borrowers in the bank-based program (7.2 percent) than for those in the competing direct-loan program (4.8 percent). The discrepancy was even larger than the department had forecast back in March, when it released preliminary data that put the rates at 7.3 and 5.3 percent.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

The student-loan industry, which learned late Friday that its loan overhaul plan would save the government $13-billion less than legislation to end bank-based lending, got another bit of bad news on Monday, when the Education Department released its annual cohort default rates.

The data, which reflects the percentage of borrowers who entered repayment in the 2007 fiscal year and defaulted within the next two years, shows that the default rate was 2.4 percentage points higher for borrowers in the bank-based program (7.2 percent) than for those in the competing direct-loan program (4.8 percent). The discrepancy was even larger than the department had forecast back in March, when it released preliminary data that put the rates at 7.3 and 5.3 percent.

Both programs had higher cohort default rates than in 2006, when 5.3 and 4.7 percent of students with bank-based and direct loans defaulted, respectively. In a news release, Secretary of Education Arne Duncan blamed the rising rates on the economic downturn, and said the department was “reaching out” to current and prospective borrowers to educate them about their loan repayment options. Borrowers facing difficulty repaying their loans may qualify for a deferment, a forbearance, or an income-based repayment plan.

The department didn’t attempt to explain the discrepancy in defaults between the programs, but it did note that there are more for-profit colleges in the bank-based program than in direct lending. As usual, the 2007 rate was higher for borrowers who attended for-profit institutions (11 percent) than for borrowers who attended public colleges (5.9 percent) or private colleges (3.7 percent). Borrowers who attended for-profit institutions may be more likely to be working adults who have lost their jobs, said Brett E. Lief, president of the National Council of Higher Education Loan Programs.

“It’s disappointing and it reflects what is probably the first of a couple years of increases in default rates because of the economy,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

The release of the data comes just three days before the U.S. House of Representatives is scheduled to vote on a Democratic bill to shift all loans to the direct-loan system. Supporters of the legislation are certain to draw attention to the default-rate data during debate over the measure.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Law & Policy
Kelly Field
Kelly Field joined The Chronicle of Higher Education in 2004 and covered federal higher-education policy. She continues to write for The Chronicle on a freelance basis.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin