Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Hands-On Career Preparation
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    Alternative Pathways
Sign In
The Review

In Defense of Diversity Statements

By Charlotte M. Canning and Richard J. Reddick January 11, 2019
In Defense of Diversity Statements with a second line 1
Randy Lyhus for The Chronicle

In a recent Chronicle Review essay, Jeffrey Flier repudiated the growing practice of asking faculty members to include diversity statements in their hiring, promotion, and review materials. On the face of it, Flier’s argument is reasonable and thoughtful. After all, he agrees that much has been achieved, and that much still remains to be done, in the elimination of bias and prejudice. But, he claims, mandatory diversity statements risk introducing “politically influenced litmus tests” to faculty evaluations and undermining the “objectivity of these reviews … essential to the integrity of the academy.” These are serious charges and need to be addressed.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

In a recent Chronicle Review essay, Jeffrey Flier repudiated the growing practice of asking faculty members to include diversity statements in their hiring, promotion, and review materials. On the face of it, Flier’s argument is reasonable and thoughtful. After all, he agrees that much has been achieved, and that much still remains to be done, in the elimination of bias and prejudice. But, he claims, mandatory diversity statements risk introducing “politically influenced litmus tests” to faculty evaluations and undermining the “objectivity of these reviews … essential to the integrity of the academy.” These are serious charges and need to be addressed.

Contrary to Flier’s scaremongering, diversity statements are a way to strengthen the academy’s mission to serve all of its constituencies with integrity and fairness. He objects that there is no consensus about the definitions of diversity, equity, and inclusion. But scholars are often tasked with assessing our peers’ work in domains that are not static or settled. In such situations, we look to experts and peers — but we also embrace the freedom to introduce our own ideas.

Claims that the academy is a space of objective assessment do not square with reality, particularly for those on the margins. The progress that Flier and others rightly point to occurred precisely because scholars employed strategies to create more-diverse and inclusive admissions, retention, and career-development paths. It didn’t happen by chance or simply because of demographic shifts.

Recently, Carmen Mitchell, a Ph.D. student at the University of Louisville, presented a compelling argument supporting the University of California at Los Angeles’s diversity-statement policy with examples of how equitable and inclusive environments had led to her own pursuit of a doctorate. Much of the work of producing such environments is invisible — not credited in decisions on promotion and tenure — and disproportionately performed by people of color, women, queer, and other underrepresented faculty members. This is the genesis of education scholar Amado Padilla’s concept of “cultural taxation” and Geneva Gay’s notion of “problematic popularity” (in the vernacular, the “Black/Brown tax” and its many variants). In response, the university must acknowledge that diversity work is in fact critical to the values that have led to progress — and that it must be shared by all members of the academic community. Instead of relying on Herculean efforts by marginalized faculty members, it should be distributed among all, as well as administrators.

This is the origin of diversity policies like UCLA’s. Such policies put those who have relied on the efforts of culturally taxed colleagues on notice that they, too, must do their part to build an academy that provides opportunity for all. It is notable that UCLA asks for “past, present, and future (planned) contributions to equity, diversity, and inclusion.” If issues of equity and diversity were not already on one’s radar, this invites engagement. For example, a faculty member might create a plan to introduce students from an underrepresented population to their research area via guest lecturing in a colleague’s class or presenting research at a community forum.

Further, the exercise of writing, reviewing, and committing to a statement of equity, diversity, and inclusion can be instructive to all members of the academic community, not only those who hold marginalized identities. As the literary scholar Patricia Matthew suggests in the preface to Written/Unwritten: Diversity and the Hidden Truths of Tenure (University of North Carolina Press, 2016), thinking about inclusion efforts can help scholars learn that “it’s not enough not to be racist … or offer a sympathetic nod when they see that faculty of color are being treated unfairly.” Further engagement by all faculty members can help them understand “what to do (and what not to say)” and to develop “a fuller understanding of what their colleagues of color face.” While Matthew’s anthology focuses on race, diversity statements address the many forms of exclusion with which higher education struggles.

The university must acknowledge that diversity work is critical to its values.

Providing equitable environments that inspire students to pursue their academic dreams, and ensuring that they can do their work free from harassment or violence, is a task our profession must commit to with immediacy and zeal. This is an articulation of values that academics of every political stripe should be faithful to. Diversity statements as critical scholarly documents will foster productive conversations about the faculty’s role in shaping and improving higher education.

To be sure, requiring such statements runs the risk of participating in what Roderick Ferguson calls the “bureaucratization of diversity” — institutional lip service that does not actually bring about change. In order for diversity statements to avoid this pitfall, they must ask faculty members not to toe a line or embrace a single ideology but to demonstrate deep engagement with their students and their community. There can be no single model for this, because what constitutes diversity, equity, and inclusion in the rehearsal room, science lab, playing field, library, lecture hall, or seminar room will differ by discipline and instructor.

This discussion is an apt opportunity to broaden the dialogue about how all faculty members, but especially marginalized faculty members, are taxed with demands on their time and energy — and how the academy has not invested sufficient resources to measure those contributions. Indeed, it has allowed many faculty members to simply opt out of the critical work of broadening access and progress. As the feminist scholar Sara Ahmed says, “When diversity becomes a conversation, a space is opened up.” Diversity statements can illuminate the invisible labor that goes into making that conversation possible — and help replace good intentions with actions and accountability.

Charlotte M. Canning is a professor of drama at the University of Texas at Austin, where Richard J. Reddick is an associate professor of educational leadership and policy and of African and African Diaspora Studies.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Richard J. Reddick
Richard J. Reddick is a professor of educational leadership and policy and of African and African diaspora studies at the University of Texas at Austin, where he is a member of the Provost’s Distinguished Service Academy and associate dean for equity, community engagement, and outreach in the College of Education.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Marva Johnson is set to take the helm of Florida A&M University this summer.
Leadership & governance
‘Surprising': A DeSantis-Backed Lobbyist Is Tapped to Lead Florida A&M
Students and community members protest outside of Coffman Memorial Union at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis, on Tuesday, April 23, 2024.
Campus Activism
One Year After the Encampments, Campuses Are Quieter and Quicker to Stop Protests
Hoover-NBERValue-0516 002 B
Diminishing Returns
Why the College Premium Is Shrinking for Low-Income Students
Harvard University
'Deeply Unsettling'
Harvard’s Battle With Trump Escalates as Research Money Is Suddenly Canceled

From The Review

Illustration showing a valedictorian speaker who's tassel is a vintage microphone
The Review | Opinion
A Graduation Speaker Gets Canceled
By Corey Robin
Illustration showing a stack of coins and a university building falling over
The Review | Opinion
Here’s What Congress’s Endowment-Tax Plan Might Cost Your College
By Phillip Levine
Photo-based illustration of a college building under an upside down baby crib
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Must Stop Infantilizing Everyone
By Gregory Conti

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin