> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
News
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

In Messy Aftermath of Offensive Videos, Free-Speech Group Decries Syracuse’s ‘Kitchen Sink’ Discipline

By  Teghan Simonton
June 11, 2018

When Syracuse University’s student newspaper published videos in April that showed members of an engineering fraternity doing and saying racist and sexist things, the campus was thrown into turmoil. The videos showed some Theta Tau brothers’ taking part in vile skits, prompting student activists to demand change quickly.

The New York university acted fast. Within days, the fraternity chapter was banned from the campus. And now, two months later, administrators have found 15 students responsible for harassment. Last week it suspended them for up to two years.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

When Syracuse University’s student newspaper published videos in April that showed members of an engineering fraternity doing and saying racist and sexist things, the campus was thrown into turmoil. The videos showed some Theta Tau brothers’ taking part in vile skits, prompting student activists to demand change quickly.

The New York university acted fast. Within days, the fraternity chapter was banned from the campus. And now, two months later, administrators have found 15 students responsible for harassment. Last week it suspended them for up to two years.

But the penalties have brought their own challenges. Five fraternity members are now suing the university, asserting that the videos were private and taken out of context. And the Foundation for Individual Rights In Education, a free-speech advocacy group known as FIRE, has strongly supported the students. Debate over the value of campus free speech has ensued.

Ari Cohn, director of the Individual Rights Defense Program at FIRE, said the discipline was a “flagrant violation” of Syracuse’s promise of freedom of expression for students. It was “particularly egregious,” he said, for the university to ignore the context of the videos as satire in a private setting.

“This was completely private expression,” said Cohn. “This was intended to be seen and heard only by people in the fraternity, none of whom were particularly upset by it … to hold the fraternity members responsible for private expression amongst themselves that happened to be learned of later by an outside party … is just unfathomable.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Cohn said the suspensions were a drastic, “kitchen-sink-type approach” for Syracuse to avoid embarrassment over comments in the videos.

In a letter to students, faculty, and staff last week, Robert Hradsky, dean of students, said: “We treated this investigation and student-conduct process fairly and expeditiously. It is now time for our community to focus on the important work of advancing a more inclusive campus community.”

Syracuse’s disciplinary action is reminiscent of the University of Oklahoma’s decision in 2015 to expel two fraternity members after they were caught on video leading a racist chant.

But there’s an important distinction between the two campuses: Oklahoma is public, while Syracuse is private. “Private institutions are not directly bound by the First Amendment,” said Cathy Cocks, president of the Association for Student Conduct Administrators, adding that she could not comment on the Syracuse case specifically. But, she continued, “most institutions embrace the concept of freedom of expression.” Student-conduct processes, she said, exist to deal with alleged harassment, threats, disruption, and so forth.

FIRE calls the students’ suspensions a ‘miscarriage of justice.’

While acknowledging Syracuse is private, Cohn said it had betrayed students’ rights to freedom of expression. In response to the university’s decision to punish the fraternity members, FIRE has written a letter to Syracuse and plans to publicize what Cohn called a “miscarriage of justice.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“What they are bound by are the promises they make to students to induce students to enroll at the school, and one of those promises that Syracuse is pretty ready to tout when it serves them is freedom of expression,” he said. “I mean, their communication school has ‘freedom of expression’ and First Amendment principles emblazoned on the side of the building in gigantic letters. And if this is what passes for free speech at Syracuse, they might as well just rip those letters right off the wall.”

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Leadership & Governance
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin