Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Paying for College

In N.C., Debate Over an Aid Freeze—and What It Means to Be Affordable

By Eric Kelderman July 31, 2014
The U. of North Carolina system is considering capping the amount of tuition revenue that campuses spend on need-based financial aid at 15 percent. Six of the campuses, including the flagship at Chapel Hill (above), already exceed that benchmark. The rationale behind the proposal is that universities are levying tuition increases to pay for need-based aid, and in doing so are driving up the debt burden of students across the system.
The U. of North Carolina system is considering capping the amount of tuition revenue that campuses spend on need-based financial aid at 15 percent. Six of the campuses, including the flagship at Chapel Hill (above), already exceed that benchmark. The rationale behind the proposal is that universities are levying tuition increases to pay for need-based aid, and in doing so are driving up the debt burden of students across the system.iStock

Affordability is the aim of countless proposed higher-education policies. The question is, affordability for whom?

In North Carolina, that’s what the university system’s Board of Governors is trying to sort out. The board is considering a policy that would cap the amount of tuition revenue the state’s public universities could put toward need-based financial aid. Under the plan, each of the system’s 16 campuses would be allowed to apply just 15 percent of its total tuition revenue to such aid.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Affordability is the aim of countless proposed higher-education policies. The question is, affordability for whom?

In North Carolina, that’s what the university system’s Board of Governors is trying to sort out. The board is considering a policy that would cap the amount of tuition revenue the state’s public universities could put toward need-based financial aid. Under the plan, each of the system’s 16 campuses would be allowed to apply just 15 percent of its total tuition revenue to such aid.

It’s not a theoretical cap: Six of the campuses already exceed that benchmark, including the flagship campus in Chapel Hill, where a little more than 20 percent of tuition revenue is redirected to financial aid, according to figures from the board.

A handful of other states have considered or acted on similar measures, including Iowa, where the legislature and statewide Board of Regents have already barred public universities from using tuition from in-state students for financial aid. In those states, the debate about improving access to public higher education is taking the tone of a class war, pitting the needs of low-income students against their wealthier peers. The case being made: Tuition paid by middle- and upper-income families is subsidizing the cost of serving lower-income students.

That’s a key part of the argument in North Carolina, where the rationale for the proposed new policy is that universities are levying tuition increases to pay for need-based aid—and, in doing so, they are driving up the debt burden of students across the system.

“All students would benefit from restraining growth in the cost of tuition, which contributes to increases in the amount of student debt,” says a working group’s explanation of the proposal, which will be discussed at a board meeting on Friday. J. Craig Souza, a board member leading the working group, did not respond to a request for comment.

The board rejected a similar policy in 2012, but the political climate in the state—and on the board—has shifted. Jenna Ashley Robinson, director of outreach at the John William Pope Center for Higher Education, in Raleigh, said her organization supports this conservative approach, which reflects the state’s political climate.

“There is a new emphasis on fiscal responsibility” by the Board of Governors, said Ms. Robinson, in part because the composition of the board has changed. She wrote last year that new appointees to the board would make it overwhelmingly Republican, with 29 of the 35 members—including Mr. Souza—affiliated with the party.

The current system of using tuition as a key source of financial-aid money has created a vicious cycle in which tuition increases are needed just to provide more aid, Ms. Robinson said. But, she argued, middle-class families are bearing the brunt of that approach: Because they don’t qualify for the aid, they can’t keep up with the increased costs. The board, she said, “wants to make low tuition a priority for everyone, rather than focusing on one part of the student body—the part that needs aid.”

Ms. Robinson cited another problem: Students from out of state, who generally pay much more in tuition, are benefiting too much from the tuition revenue of North Carolina residents, she said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Over all, however, nonresidents pay more in tuition than they receive in aid. Nonresident undergraduates contributed about 29 percent of the tuition revenue put toward financial aid and received about 24 percent of the grant assistance that came from that pool of money. Including graduate students, however, nonresidents contributed 43 percent of the financial-aid dollars from tuition and received a quarter of that money.

By contrast, resident undergraduates contributed 46 percent of the overall aid pool, and they received 70 percent of the aid.

Other higher-education experts said a cap on aid allocation would result in higher costs for low-income students without any real benefit for students at higher income levels.

David W. Strauss, a consultant with the Art & Science Group, said a policy limiting tuition for financial aid is a purely ideological move. Most flagship universities are actually priced too low, he said. Instead of pursuing a one-tuition-fits-all approach, he argued, they should use the strategy employed by many private institutions and charge wealthy students higher rates. In his vision, those students should provide the revenue that improves the college experience—and offers more financial-aid dollars—for both lower- and middle-income students.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The best practice is not to hew to an arbitrary percentage,” he said, “but to figure out which pricing strategy is better for your institution and students.”

Mr. Strauss and others questioned a case made by proponents of aid caps—that using more tuition for financial aid can be linked to increased student debt. At the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, which uses more than 20 percent of its tuition revenue for financial aid, students, on average, borrow less than $5,400 per year. At North Carolina Central University, which applies 15 percent of tuition revenue to financial aid, the average debt is about $2,000 greater. Ms. Robinson said this is because the Chapel Hill campus raises much more money to provide scholarship support to students.

But Amy Laitinen, deputy director for higher education at the New America Foundation, disagreed. “One of the stated reasons for the change is to address student debt,” she said in an email. “But this policy just shifts the debt burden to lower-income students.” That’s easier to accomplish politically than, say, persuading state legislators to provide more money through state appropriations, she said.

“This policy,” she said, “is a real departure for a state that prides itself on affordable higher education.”

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Finance & Operations
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Eric Kelderman
About the Author
Eric Kelderman
Eric Kelderman covers issues of power, politics, and purse strings in higher education. You can email him at eric.kelderman@chronicle.com, or find him on Twitter @etkeld.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Joan Wong for The Chronicle
Productivity Measures
A 4/4 Teaching Load Becomes Law at Most of Wisconsin’s Public Universities
Illustration showing a letter from the South Carolina Secretary of State over a photo of the Bob Jones University campus.
Missing Files
Apparent Paperwork Error Threatens Bob Jones U.'s Legal Standing in South Carolina
Pro-Palestinian student protesters demonstrate outside Barnard College in New York on February 27, 2025, the morning after pro-Palestinian student protesters stormed a Barnard College building to protest the expulsion last month of two students who interrupted a university class on Israel. (Photo by TIMOTHY A. CLARY / AFP) (Photo by TIMOTHY A. CLARY/AFP via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
A College Vows to Stop Engaging With Some Student Activists to Settle a Lawsuit Brought by Jewish Students
LeeNIHGhosting-0709
Stuck in limbo
The Scientists Who Got Ghosted by the NIH

From The Review

Vector illustration of a suited man with a pair of scissors for a tie and an American flag button on his lapel.
The Review | Opinion
A Damaging Endowment Tax Crosses the Finish Line
By Phillip Levine
University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky
Photo-based illustration depicting a close-up image of a mouth of a young woman with the letter A over the lips and grades in the background
The Review | Opinion
When Students Want You to Change Their Grades
By James K. Beggan

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin