Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
News

In the Lab, Failure Is Part of the Job Description

By Alexander C. Kafka June 15, 2018
Jay Van Bavel realized that hearing lab colleagues report only on their successes might give younger researchers in particular a false sense of what academic life is really like. Now, at weekly meetings, everyone shares their defeats as well.
Jay Van Bavel realized that hearing lab colleagues report only on their successes might give younger researchers in particular a false sense of what academic life is really like. Now, at weekly meetings, everyone shares their defeats as well.iStock

Jay Van Bavel is a highly successful research psychologist at New York University, but he also likes junior colleagues to know about his crummy first year as an assistant professor, when he had 10 papers and three grant proposals rejected, and zero papers published.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Jay Van Bavel realized that hearing lab colleagues report only on their successes might give younger researchers in particular a false sense of what academic life is really like. Now, at weekly meetings, everyone shares their defeats as well.
Jay Van Bavel realized that hearing lab colleagues report only on their successes might give younger researchers in particular a false sense of what academic life is really like. Now, at weekly meetings, everyone shares their defeats as well.iStock

Jay Van Bavel is a highly successful research psychologist at New York University, but he also likes junior colleagues to know about his crummy first year as an assistant professor, when he had 10 papers and three grant proposals rejected, and zero papers published.

Make no mistake, over all, he has kicked scholarly butt. Now an associate professor, he is also affiliated with NYU’s Stern School of Business, has published more than 60 papers, and won prestigious academic awards and a wide range of grants.

But Van Bavel, a first-generation college graduate from a tiny town in Canada, studies the impact of social environment on individuals. Naturally, then, he is attuned to such effects in his own lab. Inspired by a colleague’s suggestion, eight years ago, he and his labmates started regularly celebrating successes. Over snacks, they’d revel over a publication accepted, a dissertation defended, a student award. He eventually realized that might give younger researchers, particularly, a false sense of what life as a researcher is really like. So now at those weekly meetings 10 to 20 grad students, postdocs, and undergrads also share their defeats.

“I decided to flip the script,” Van Bavel says. “We’re also going to announce the failures, because they are far more common and they’re also part of the process.”

The change was prompted, in part, by a March article in Nature citing “evidence for a mental-health crisis in graduate education.” Its authors wrote that a survey of 2,279 respondents, mostly doctoral students, showed that graduate students “are more than six times as likely to experience depression and anxiety as compared to the general population.” The authors urged interventions by academic institutions.

Van Bavel didn’t have a first authorship on a paper until his fifth year of grad school, he says, and he worried about how anxiety-producing it could be for first-year grad students to only see their fellow scientists toasting victories.

In the spirit of the new proceedings, there were more than enough failures to go around. One postdoc talked about having the same paper, with changes prompted each round by reviewers, rejected five times in five years. Another cited three rejections in three months.

But it’s not a pity party, either, Van Bavel says.

“What kind of feedback are you getting?” colleagues would ask each other about papers that didn’t make it. Then they’d suggest other journals that might be more receptive to a particular kind of work, other approaches to analyzing data sets, ways to cross-check and document results and catch errors, how to get financial help for open-access journal submission fees, and so on.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It can have some practical aspects to it, so you can actually walk away with some improved norms,” says Diego Reinero, a fourth-year doctoral student in Van Bavel’s lab.

“It turned out to be a really constructive group problem-solving activity,” Van Bavel says. “You could tell there was a good vibe in the room.”

There was a good vibe on the web too when he tweeted about it The tweet quickly garnered several hundred thousand hits, a few thousand likes, more than a thousand retweets, and almost 70 replies, including from labs that said they planned to try the same thing. And, astonishingly, Van Bavel says, there were no naysaying trolls.

I tried something new at my weekly lab meeting.

Normally we start the meeting by announcing any upcoming events and celebrating accomplishments from lab members (eg papers, awards, graduations, presentations).

This week we added failures & setbacks to the announcements.

1/n

— Jay Van Bavel (@jayvanbavel) June 2, 2018

“I wanted,” he wrote on Twitter, “to make it transparent how common failure is to everyone in the lab — especially the younger students who haven’t yet enjoyed some of the success that happens more frequently to senior students and postdocs. Those first few years are full of failure and criticism.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“Opening up the conversation normalized the process and created an instant brainstorming support session. It also sparked a conversation about how we all deal with rejection.”

Learning from failure is a scholarly theme, a management trope, and a publishing cottage industry. When Johannes Haushofer, an assistant professor of psychology and public affairs at Princeton, published his “CV of Failures” a couple years ago, it was so popular that he amended it to include a “meta-failure": “This darn CV of Failures has received way more attention than my entire body of academic work.”

Still, on a day-to-day level, the discussion of failure really is helpful, Van Bavel’s students and associates say.

“I haven’t had that in a lab meeting before, but I think it’s a really good idea,” says Tina Sundelin, a postdoc from Sweden who works at an NYU lab neighboring Van Bavel’s. She studies the effects of sleep loss and regularly attends his meetings.

ADVERTISEMENT

She has papers that have been in the submission-rejection-comment-revision cycle for several years. The better the journals you target, the more rejections you’ll have, she says, and “it’s easy to get dejected.” Moreover, stewing over the rewrites, she also gets sick of her own work and wants to move on. “I don’t even want to look at it,” she says. “I think that happens to everyone.” There was a moment during her grad work at Stockholm University, she says, “when I thought, ‘Why am I doing this? No one cares about this stuff.’” Fortunately, she had a good mentor, contagiously enthusiastic, and she would come away from meetings with him feeling re-energized.

She counsels grad students to fight the feeling that they need to work seven days a week. “Yes, it’s career,” she tells them, “but it’s also school,” a learning opportunity. “You’re supposed to make mistakes and learn from those mistakes.”

Reinero, the fourth-year grad student, has been a coauthor on four papers and has experienced highs and lows. Toward the end of his first year of grad school, he published a paper in a high-impact journal about scientific-replicability issues and won a National Science Foundation doctoral fellowship. “I was excited,” he recalls. But just a half-year ago, he was in an emotional valley. He studies cognitive synchronicity — synchronous brain patterns between people in groups — and he was hitting a lot of road blocks. Experimental subjects were hard to recruit and even when they had signed up they sometimes failed to show. The computational complexity of the project made him feel like he needed Ph.D.s in math and statistics and neuroscience, not just psychology. He felt “stalled out, inadequate.” Friends and family talked him through it, but he knows such periods are part of the job description.

Mark Hoffarth is another postdoc in a neighboring lab who joins Van Bavel’s meetings. He studies political psychology, group identity, and human sexuality. He’s the one who told the group about having a paper rejected five times in five years. (It’s about attitudes on well-being. Chalk one up for irony.) Don’t think about the setbacks as failure, he tells grad students, but “just as the next step in the process.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Developments, good and bad, seem to happen in clusters sometimes. When Hoffarth was a first-year doctoral student, he was trying to get his master’s thesis published, felt frustrated, and wasn’t sure he wanted to stay in science. Then, toward the end of that year — after three years of rejections and no papers published — he had three previously rejected papers accepted within two weeks. It was, he says, “a Hollywood drama of ups and downs.”

“That’s kind of the way science works,” he says.

Alexander C. Kafka is a senior editor and oversees Idea Lab. Follow him on Twitter @AlexanderKafka, or email him at alexander.kafka@chronicle.com.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Scholarship & Research
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Kafka_Alexander_C.jpg
About the Author
Alexander C. Kafka
Alexander C. Kafka is a Chronicle senior editor. Email him at alexander.kafka@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

The Lessons of Failure
Project Failure
Failure as a Muse
Creative Ways to Help Students Recover From Failure

More News

Joan Wong for The Chronicle
Productivity Measures
A 4/4 Teaching Load Becomes Law at Most of Wisconsin’s Public Universities
Illustration showing a letter from the South Carolina Secretary of State over a photo of the Bob Jones University campus.
Missing Files
Apparent Paperwork Error Threatens Bob Jones U.'s Legal Standing in South Carolina
Pro-Palestinian student protesters demonstrate outside Barnard College in New York on February 27, 2025, the morning after pro-Palestinian student protesters stormed a Barnard College building to protest the expulsion last month of two students who interrupted a university class on Israel. (Photo by TIMOTHY A. CLARY / AFP) (Photo by TIMOTHY A. CLARY/AFP via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
A College Vows to Stop Engaging With Some Student Activists to Settle a Lawsuit Brought by Jewish Students
LeeNIHGhosting-0709
Stuck in limbo
The Scientists Who Got Ghosted by the NIH

From The Review

Vector illustration of a suited man with a pair of scissors for a tie and an American flag button on his lapel.
The Review | Opinion
A Damaging Endowment Tax Crosses the Finish Line
By Phillip Levine
University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky
Photo-based illustration depicting a close-up image of a mouth of a young woman with the letter A over the lips and grades in the background
The Review | Opinion
When Students Want You to Change Their Grades
By James K. Beggan

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin