Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
News

International Students Dodge Trump’s Partly Reinstated Travel Ban, but Concerns Persist

By Karin Fischer June 26, 2017
Protesters demonstrate against President Trump’s travel ban outside a federal courthouse in Seattle in May. In an order on Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court said students at American colleges from six Muslim-majority countries can enter the United States. But prospective students still could be affected by the ban.
Protesters demonstrate against President Trump’s travel ban outside a federal courthouse in Seattle in May. In an order on Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court said students at American colleges from six Muslim-majority countries can enter the United States. But prospective students still could be affected by the ban.AP Photo/Ted S. Warren

The U.S. Supreme Court agreed on Monday to allow a limited version of President Trump’s travel ban to take effect but said that visitors with ties to the United States — a group that the court specified includes foreign college students — will be allowed to enter the country.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Protesters demonstrate against President Trump’s travel ban outside a federal courthouse in Seattle in May. In an order on Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court said students at American colleges from six Muslim-majority countries can enter the United States. But prospective students still could be affected by the ban.
Protesters demonstrate against President Trump’s travel ban outside a federal courthouse in Seattle in May. In an order on Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court said students at American colleges from six Muslim-majority countries can enter the United States. But prospective students still could be affected by the ban.AP Photo/Ted S. Warren

The U.S. Supreme Court agreed on Monday to allow a limited version of President Trump’s travel ban to take effect but said that visitors with ties to the United States — a group that the court specified includes foreign college students — will be allowed to enter the country.

Despite that exemption, some legal experts and educators warned that the court’s action may affect prospective international students who are in the process of applying for a visa.

The move to reinstate, in part, Mr. Trump’s executive order barring travelers from a half-dozen predominantly Muslim countries came as the nation’s highest court agreed to hear arguments this fall about whether the measure is legal and constitutional.

A pair of federal appeals courts had blocked the ban, which was first announced in January, less than a week after the president took office, and was later issued in revised form. The Trump administration had asked the Supreme Court to lift the lower courts’ injunctions preventing the ban from being carried out. A ruling in the two cases, Nos. 16-1436 (16A1190) and 16-1540 (16A1191), may not come until next June.

In an unsigned order, the court permitted the ban — which applies to citizens of Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen — to go into effect, but carved out a critical exemption for “foreign nationals who have a credible claim of a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States.” And the justices spelled out that a student admitted to an American college or university would have just such a relationship.

Students will be able to come and study. I don’t see international students having any problem whatsoever.

“Students will be able to come and study,” said Allan Wernick, director of Citizenship Now, a legal-aid clinic run by the City University of New York. “I don’t see international students having any problem whatsoever.”

But other experts and educators are not as confident. Stephen Yale-Loehr, a professor of law at Cornell University who specializes in immigration law, said that while the order’s language will permit current students from the six countries to leave the United States for the summer and return for fall classes, he is concerned that the situation for new students, who have not yet begun their studies and are applying for a visa, could be less clear.

The court’s order does not detail how the federal government is to determine if travelers have connections to the United States that would meet the standards it set out.

Will the burden be on visa applicants or on the government to demonstrate a “bona fide relationship”? Mr. Yale-Loehr asked. Will colleges’ acceptance letters be sufficient to prove students’ ties to the United States?

Colleges should be prepared to go to court on behalf of students who are not issued visas or who are denied entry to the United States, Mr. Yale-Loehr said.

A ‘Bona Fide’ Relationship

Erwin Chemerinsky, a prominent legal scholar, agreed that the impact of the court’s order could differ between students who have already attended college in the United States and those who have only been admitted.

ADVERTISEMENT

Students who have already attended a college or university should pass the court’s test for having established a “bona fide” relationship, said Mr. Chemerinsky, who will become dean of the University of California at Berkeley’s law school on July 1.

Mr. Chemerinsky, speaking at the annual conference of the National Association of College and University Attorneys, in Chicago, said there may be more of a question about students who have yet to attend college in the United States, but an offer of admission may still be enough to meet the standard.

And Esther D. Brimmer, executive director of Nafsa: Association of International Educators, decried the court’s distinction between travelers with ties to the United States and those without firm relationships in this country.

“Individuals from the affected countries with no ties to the United States will be subject to the ban on the grounds that a lack of connection to the United States somehow provides evidence of a national-security threat,” Ms. Brimmer said in a written statement. “If that is the case, then we should be making every effort to create connections and ties through robust international exchange and travel.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Colleges, meanwhile, are scrambling, yet again, to provide guidance to international students and scholars.

William I. Brustein, vice president for global strategies and international affairs at West Virginia University, said that although he was pleased that the court had exempted students from the reinstated ban, he worried that new requirements to demonstrate ties could increase visa-processing backlogs and lengthen wait times for students applying to study in the United States.

The advice we’re going to give to students is to start the process of getting their visa early.

“The big problem could be consular officers’ workload increasing with the vetting of each applicant,” Mr. Brustein said, adding that he was worried that entering students might not be able to get their visas in time for the start of the fall semester. “The advice we’re going to give to students is to start the process of getting their visa early.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Mr. Brustein said he was disappointed in the Supreme Court’s decision to hear the travel-ban case, rather than to allow the two appeals-court rulings, both of which froze Mr. Trump’s executive order, to stand.

Ahmad Ezzeddine, associate vice provost for educational outreach and international programs at Wayne State University, in Michigan, noted that this point in the summer is a critical time in the visa process for newly admitted students, who typically are now submitting to in-person interviews with consular officials as part of their application. “The next few weeks will be telling,” Mr. Ezzeddine said, to see how the ban will be “operationalized.”

‘A Clear Victory’

In a written statement, President Trump called the court’s decision to take up the case, while partly reinstating the ban, “a clear victory for our national security.”

The administration had argued that a 90-day halt in travel from the named countries was necessary in order to improve the government’s screening and vetting procedures.

ADVERTISEMENT

But opponents derided the executive order as a thinly disguised “Muslim ban,” which Mr. Trump had called for during last year’s presidential-election campaign. Federal courts blocked the initial order, which also covered travelers from Iraq, as well as a reworked order, issued in March.

Key to at least one of the cases was the argument that the ban was doing serious harm to colleges and their students, researchers, and faculty members. While the original ban stranded some students and professors overseas, many more were afraid to travel outside the United States, worried that they would not be able to re-enter the country.

Marty Brown, executive director of the Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges, which had made a declaration as part of Washington State’s legal challenge to the original ban — one of the cases that will be heard by the Supreme Court — said in a written statement that the system “affirms its commitment to student diversity.”

“Diversity provides a wealth of perspectives and solutions for the global world in which we all live,” Mr. Brown said. “We are proud of our students and staff members, who come from all over the world.”

ADVERTISEMENT

In fact, though, the share of students who come from the countries included in the ban is fairly small, just 15,000 out of more than a million international students currently at American colleges.

But educators are concerned that the measure’s impact is reverberating far beyond the named countries, sending a message abroad that the United States under President Trump is a less hospitable place to study.

Michael Armini, senior vice president for external affairs at Northeastern University, one of a number of colleges that have submitted legal briefs in support of challenges to the ban, said the Boston institution worries about the potential ripple effects of the measure on international-student interest.

“We remain concerned,” Mr. Armini said, “that the chilling effect of the executive order — and the possibility it may be expanded or made permanent — will curtail the nation’s ability to attract the world’s best and brightest people.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Eric Kelderman contributed to this article from Chicago.

Karin Fischer writes about international education, colleges and the economy, and other issues. She’s on Twitter @karinfischer, and her email address is karin.fischer@chronicle.com.

A version of this article appeared in the July 7, 2017, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
International
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Fischer_Karin.jpg
About the Author
Karin Fischer
Karin Fischer writes about international education and the economic, cultural, and political divides around American colleges. She’s on the social-media platform X @karinfischer, and her email address is karin.fischer@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

International Educators Confront a New Political Reality — and Find a New Resolve
Colleges Grapple With How to Help Students Still Left in Limbo by Trump’s Travel Ban
Even in Limbo, Trump’s Travel Ban Reverberates
New Travel Ban Still Sows Chaos and Confusion
Court Rebukes Trump’s Travel Ban, and Harm to Universities Plays a Key Role
Universities Spoke Up in Case That Led to Ruling Halting Trump’s Travel Ban
Trump’s Travel Ban Leaves Students Stranded — and Colleges Scrambling to Help

More News

Protesters attend a demonstration in support of Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil, March 10, 2025, in New York.
First-Amendment Rights
Noncitizen Professors Testify About Chilling Effect of Others’ Detentions
Photo-based illustration of a rock preciously suspended by a rope over three beakers.
Broken Promise
U.S. Policy Made America’s Research Engine the Envy of the World. One President Could End That.
lab-costs-promo.jpg
Research Expenses
What Does It Cost to Run a Lab?
Research illustration Microscope
Dreams Deferred
How Trump’s Cuts to Science Funding Are Derailing Young Scholars’ Careers

From The Review

University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky
Photo-based illustration depicting a close-up image of a mouth of a young woman with the letter A over the lips and grades in the background
The Review | Opinion
When Students Want You to Change Their Grades
By James K. Beggan
Photo-based illustration of a student and a professor, each occupying a red circle in a landscape of scribbles.
The Review | Opinion
Meet Students Where They Are? Maybe Not.
By Mark Horowitz

Upcoming Events

Chronfest25_Virtual-Events_Page_862x574.png
Chronicle Festival: Innovation Amid Uncertainty
07-16-Advising-InsideTrack - forum assets v1_Plain.png
The Evolving Work of College Advising
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin