Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Student Housing
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In

Investigators Find ‘Total Disregard for Safety’ of Child Victims by Penn State Officials

By Brad Wolverton July 12, 2012
Louis J. Freeh, the former FBI director, issued a scathing report that chastises former Pennsylvania State University officials for choosing not to report “critical facts” about Jerry Sandusky’s sexual abuse of children.
Louis J. Freeh, the former FBI director, issued a scathing report that chastises former Pennsylvania State University officials for choosing not to report “critical facts” about Jerry Sandusky’s sexual abuse of children.Matt Rourke, AP Images

[Updated: 1:49 p.m., 7/12/2012.]

Three weeks after Jerry Sandusky was convicted on 45 counts of child molestation, an independent report has painted a damning portrait of top officials at Pennsylvania State University and how they dealt with accusations of sexual misconduct against the former football coach.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

[Updated: 1:49 p.m., 7/12/2012.]

Three weeks after Jerry Sandusky was convicted on 45 counts of child molestation, an independent report has painted a damning portrait of top officials at Pennsylvania State University and how they dealt with accusations of sexual misconduct against the former football coach.

According to a report released in Philadelphia on Thursday morning by Louis J. Freeh, the former FBI director commissioned to lead the eight-month investigation, top Penn State administrators including Graham B. Spanier, the university’s former president, and Joe Paterno, the legendary football coach, showed a “total disregard for the safety and welfare” of children and hid critical facts from authorities, despite having knowledge of repeated allegations of child sex abuse by the coach.

“Our most saddening and sobering finding is the total disregard for the safety and welfare of Sandusky’s child victims by the most senior leaders at Penn State,” Mr. Freeh said in a statement. “The most powerful men at Penn State failed to take any steps for 14 years to protect the children who Sandusky victimized.” Mr. Spanier, Mr. Paterno, Gary C. Schultz, the university’s former senior vice president, and Timothy M. Curley, its athletic director, “never demonstrated, through actions or words, any concern for the safety and well-being of Sandusky’s victims until after Sandusky’s arrest.”

The report describes a series of missteps across the university, including a failure of the university to carry out provisions of the Clery Act, the federal law requiring the reporting of crimes like the ones Mr. Sandusky committed.

And while Mr. Freeh stops short of describing a coverup by university officials, various e-mails and documents suggest that Mr. Spanier, Mr. Schultz, Mr. Curley, and Mr. Paterno knew for years about the sexual nature of the accusations against Mr. Sandusky and kept them under wraps.

According to the report, top university officials first learned about Mr. Sandusky’s unusual behavior beginning in May 1998, after the mother of an 11-year-old boy reported that the coach had showered with her son in the Lasch football building. The police began an investigation, which Mr. Schultz was immediately informed of. He notified Mr. Spanier and Mr. Curley in an e-mail stating, “Behavior—at best inappropriate @ worst sexual improprieties.” He also notes, “Is this the opening of pandora’s box?” and “Other children?”

But the head of the police decided against pressing charges against the coach, saying, “I can justify that decision because of the lack of clear evidence of a crime.” Mr. Curley then notified Mr. Spanier and Mr. Schultz that he had “touched base with” Mr. Paterno about the incident, and Mr. Sandusky continued to coach.

Days later, when the university’s Board of Trustees met, Mr. Spanier did not notify its members of the investigation, a disturbing pattern he repeated during a 2001 investigation into the coach, the report says.

“By not promptly and fully advising the Board of Trustees about the 1998 and 2001 child sexual-abuse allegations against Sandusky and the subsequent grand-jury investigation of him, Spanier failed in his duties as president,” the report concludes. “The board also failed in its duties to oversee the president and senior university officials in 1998 and 2001 by not inquiring about important university matters and by not creating an environment where senior university officials felt accountable.”

ADVERTISEMENT

During the 2001 investigation, Mr. Schultz consulted with Wendell V. Courtney, the university’s outside counsel, “re reporting of suspected child abuse,” according to documents Mr. Freeh’s investigators found.

The next day, Mr. Spanier, Mr. Schultz, and Mr. Curley met to discuss the situation. Mr. Schultz’s confidential notes indicated that he spoke to Mr. Curley, reviewed the history of the 1998 incident, and agreed that Mr. Curley would discuss the incident with Mr. Paterno.

Mr. Schultz’s notes state: “Unless he confesses to having a problem, [Curley] will indicate we need to have DPW review the matter as an independent agency concerned w child welfare.”

The three leaders devised a plan, reflected in Mr. Schultz’s notes, that would include telling the chair of the board of Second Mile, the charity Mr. Sandusky started and where he preyed on children, and asking the coach to avoid bringing children alone into the Lasch building.

ADVERTISEMENT

But after Mr. Curley spoke with Mr. Paterno, he e-mailed Mr. Spanier and Mr. Schultz that he had changed his mind about the plan. Instead, Mr. Curley proposed telling Mr. Sandusky that “we feel there is a problem” and offering him “professional help.”

Mr. Spanier e-mailed Mr. Schultz and Mr. Curley: “This approach is acceptable to me,” he said. “The only downside for us is if the message isn’t ‘heard’ and acted upon, and we then become vulnerable for not having reported it.”

“But that can be assessed down the road,” he continued. “The approach you outline is humane and a reasonable way to proceed.”

Those decisions illustrated a “striking lack of empathy for child-abuse victims by the most senior leaders of the university,” the report says.

ADVERTISEMENT

Mr. Spanier, who was interviewed by Mr. Freeh’s staff last week, told the investigators that he never heard a report from anyone that Mr. Sandusky was engaged in any sexual abuse of children. Both Mr. Schultz and Mr. Curley, who face charges of lying to a grand jury and failing to report child abuse, have also denied knowing that Mr. Sandusky’s behavior was of a sexual nature.

The report paints a different picture, with an indictment of Mr. Spanier very likely, one legal expert told The Chronicle.

“The Freeh report is a scathing indictment of Graham Spanier and others who fostered a culture at Penn State that valued football over possible child sexual-assault victims,” said John M. Burkoff, a University of Pittsburgh law professor and expert on criminal law in Pennsylvania. “It certainly appears to me that an actual indictment of Spanier would appear now to be all but inevitable.”

Matthew Casey, a lawyer for some of Mr. Sandusky’s victims, said on Thursday that the report paints an even more damning portrait of top Penn State officials than early leaks seemed to indicate.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Words like ‘concealment,’ words like ‘shocking,’ used by a former federal judge who was hired by Penn State,” Mr. Casey said, “those are bad words for any institution that now has to assess their own liability.”

Timothy Sandoval contributed to this article from Philadelphia, Jack Stripling from Washington.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Brad Wolverton
About the Author
Brad Wolverton
Former senior writer Brad Wolverton covered college athletics at The Chronicle beginning in 2005, focusing on the confluence of money and sports on campus. His research highlighted allegations of academic misconduct, reports of coaches’ meddling in medical decisions, and concerns about a rapid rise in athletics donations.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

How the Penn State Report Implicates Top Officials
Freeh Report Calls for Overhaul of ‘the Penn State Way’
Ignorance and Low Priority of Clery Act Obligations May Extend Beyond Penn State
A Guide to the Penn State Investigation
The Freeh Report: Complete Coverage

More News

Protesters gather outside the Department of Education headquarters in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 14, 2025 to protest the Trump administrations cuts at the agency.
An Uncertain Future
The Education Department Got a Green Light to Shrink. Here Are 3 Questions About What’s Next.
Susie West and Dianne Davis-Keening, U of M Extension SuperShelf coordinators.
A 'Connector' Severed
Congress Cut a Federal Nutrition Program, Jeopardizing Campus Jobs and Community Services
PPP 10 FINAL promo.jpg
Bouncing Back?
For Once, Public Confidence in Higher Ed Has Increased
University of California, Berkeley chancellor Dr. Rich Lyons, testifies at a Congressional hearing on antisemitism, in Washington, D.C., U.S., on July 15, 2025. It is the latest in a series of House hearings on antisemitism at the university level, one that critics claim is a convenient way for Republicans to punish universities they consider too liberal or progressive, thereby undermining responses to hate speech and hate crimes. (Photo by Allison Bailey/NurPhoto via AP)
Another Congressional Hearing
3 College Presidents Went to Congress. Here’s What They Talked About.

From The Review

Photo-based illustration with repeated images of a student walking, in the pattern of a graph trending down, then up.
The Review | Opinion
7 Ways Community Colleges Can Boost Enrollment
By Bob Levey
Illustration of an ocean tide shaped like Donald Trump about to wash away sandcastles shaped like a college campus.
The Review | Essay
Why Universities Are So Powerless in Their Fight Against Trump
By Jason Owen-Smith
Photo-based illustration of a closeup of a pencil meshed with a circuit bosrd
The Review | Essay
How Are Students Really Using AI?
By Derek O'Connell

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin