Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Leadership

Is the Pandemic Pushing a Wave of Presidents Out? Not Yet

By Eric Kelderman November 24, 2020
From left to right: Michael Young, Mary B. Marcy, Ronald A. Crutcher and Nathan Hatch
From left to right: Michael K. Young, Mary B. Marcy, Ronald A. Crutcher, and Nathan O. HatchIllustration by The Chronicle; photos from Bob Daemmrich, Ramin Rahimian, U. of Richmond, Wake Forest U.

The coronavirus pandemic has created a set of historic challenges for leaders in higher education. They’ve had to respond to threats to college finances and enrollment; cut faculty, staff, programs, and sports teams; orchestrate the logistical burdens of testing for the virus; and house those infected — all while navigating the uncertainty of when and how this strange, often remote, era will end.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

The coronavirus pandemic has created a set of historic challenges for leaders in higher education. They’ve had to respond to threats to college finances and enrollment; cut faculty, staff, programs, and sports teams; orchestrate the logistical burdens of testing for the virus; and house those infected — all while navigating the uncertainty of when and how this strange, often remote, era will end.

That might seem like enough to persuade an unusual number of college presidents to consider retiring. A number of the nation’s best-known leaders have announced their resignations this calendar year, including Mark P. Becker of Georgia State University, Michael A. McRobbie of Indiana University at Bloomington, and John Thrasher of Florida State University.

But overall, the number of campus and system presidents stepping down appears to be within the normal range. In fact, fewer presidents have announced their retirements in 2020 than in each of the previous two years, according to Chronicle data, and no retirements were announced between March 10 and May 1, according to the data. So anyone planning to step down may have put those plans on hold.

“If anything it’s caused some people not to step down because of their deep concern for their campus community,” said Barbara R. Snyder president of the Association of American Universities since February.

As of early November, 69 presidents have announced their retirements in 2020, and just 46 of those happened after mid-March, when fear of the coronavirus caused nearly every college to close or restrict attendance on its campus. In 2019, resignations were announced by 123 presidents; 80 did so in 2018. The data include only the retirements and resignations that ran in The Chronicle’s Gazette. The figures exclude presidents who were forced to resign, left under a cloud of controversy, or cited health concerns in stepping down.

Many of those who are retiring this year are finishing up lengthy careers in leadership, and finding this a natural time for a change. McRobbie, for example, has led Indiana for 14 years and is stepping down after the university celebrated the 200th anniversary of its founding, in January. Becker, too, has spent more than a decade as president at Georgia State.

While the pandemic might not have been the stated reason for many of those who did decide to step aside this year, it has had an impact on campus leadership. “If I’d seen it coming I might have retired a year earlier,” joked Michael K. Young, president of Texas A&M, who will be leaving his post at the end of December, despite an earlier plan to finish the academic year.

Quitting now kind of undermines that president-as-leader narrative.

Young said he has already spent a quarter of a century as either a dean or college president and is ready to rejoin the faculty of the law school, and to oversee the university’s Institute for Religious Liberties and International Affairs. But the pandemic has been a far different challenge from any other during his career, he said, because it affects so many parts of the institution, and he sees no definite end until the coronavirus can be controlled.

“It’s been riveting,” he said.

For others, however, the pandemic played a significant role in their decision. Jane K. Fernandes, former president of Guilford College, said in an email that she had been thinking about retiring for at least a year before she announced it in June. The effects of the coronavirus made her decision clear, she said. She left her position in July to return to the faculty.

ADVERTISEMENT

“As Covid-19 took its toll, and I saw an alternate reality for higher education unfolding before my eyes, I discerned that it was time for me to step away and allow a new leader to join the Guilford community,” Fernandes wrote.

The Case for Continuity

Search consultants say they are seeing a somewhat different trend. Roderick J. McDavis, managing principal at AGB Search, said the number of searches his firm is conducting is “a tad higher” than normal because some presidents who had announced their resignations in 2019 chose to stay longer. The firm is now opening searches for that group, as well as for the new group of presidents who have newly announced their retirements in 2020, he said.

Anne Coyle, a consultant with the search firm Russell Reynolds Associates, said a larger group of presidents may be set to announce their retirements as early as December, with plans to leave their posts in the spring of 2022.

But scholars who study higher-education leadership say they aren’t surprised that the number of announced resignations has not skyrocketed since March, as might be expected given the pressures of a global crisis.

ADVERTISEMENT

“A lot of presidents feel their institution is embattled right now,” said Brendan Cantwell, an associate professor of educational administration at Michigan State University. “Presidents and boards very likely feel that the crisis requires continuity.”

“The sort of real-time decision making needed in the pandemic means that leaders rely on established relationships, communication channels, and go-to implementation strategies to get things done,” Cantwell said.

But much or all of that can be disrupted during a leadership change, he said, as other senior members of the cabinet leave, new relationships are required, and the new president installs a new team.

A presidential search also can cost a significant amount of money, Cantwell said, which can be difficult to justify when the institution is struggling financially and making deep budget cuts.

ADVERTISEMENT

Personal pride may also be at stake, he said. “Presidents present themselves as people who can get things done. They get a high salary because they have what it takes to lead the campus through hard times into a better future. Quitting now kind of undermines that president-as-leader narrative.”

Felecia Commodore, an assistant professor of educational foundations and leadership at Old Dominion University, echoed the idea that presidents are sensitive to looking weak during a crisis. “Many leaders don’t want to look like the captain who decided to jump ship,” she said.

And it’s not just internal disruptions that a college is worried about, she said. A turnover in leadership could signal instability to the wider public and even affect enrollment. “Anything that would make a college look unstable would concern leadership,” she said.

But it’s too soon to say that the pandemic won’t eventually take a toll on the ranks of college leaders, she said. Two big trends could emerge after Covid-19 that will lead to a much larger rate of turnover, she said. The first is burnout from leading through a prolonged crisis.

ADVERTISEMENT

In addition, many governing boards that are not entirely happy with their leadership but reluctant to undertake a search are waiting for a more stable environment, Commodore said. How a president handles the current crisis will very likely be a factor in many of those decisions, she added.

The coronavirus has also created a new set of expectations for incoming leaders, she said. After the 2008-9 recession, presidents were expected to have a better understanding of the financial markets and higher-education business models.

Now, they will be required to know much more about managing a public-health emergency, she said.

“Scholars have been trying to tell us that most of our colleges are not prepared for a massive crisis,” she said. “This now is going to be a benchmark.”

Audrey Williams June contributed to this article.

A version of this article appeared in the December 11, 2020, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Leadership & Governance
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Eric Kelderman
About the Author
Eric Kelderman
Eric Kelderman covers issues of power, politics, and purse strings in higher education. You can email him at eric.kelderman@chronicle.com, or find him on Twitter @etkeld.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Brad Wolverton
Newsroom leadership
The Chronicle of Higher Education Names Brad Wolverton as Editor
Vector illustration of large open scissors  with several workers in seats dangling by white lines
Iced Out
The Death of Shared Governance
Illustration showing money being funnelled into the top of a microscope.
'A New Era'
Higher-Ed Associations Pitch an Alternative to Trump’s Cap on Research Funding
Illustration showing classical columns of various heights, each turning into a stack of coins
Endowment funds
The Nation’s Wealthiest Small Colleges Just Won a Big Tax Exemption

From The Review

Illustration of an ocean tide shaped like Donald Trump about to wash away sandcastles shaped like a college campus.
The Review | Essay
Why Universities Are So Powerless in Their Fight Against Trump
By Jason Owen-Smith
Photo-based illustration of a closeup of a pencil meshed with a circuit bosrd
The Review | Essay
How Are Students Really Using AI?
By Derek O'Connell
John T. Scopes as he stood before the judges stand and was sentenced, July 2025.
The Review | Essay
100 Years Ago, the Scopes Monkey Trial Discovered Academic Freedom
By John K. Wilson

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin