Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
Photo illustration of a tarnished and cobweb-covered trophy bearing the U.S. News & World Best Colleges Ranking logo
Chronicle Illustration, iStock images

Is This the Beginning of the End of the ‘U.S. News’ Rankings’ Dominance?

A Growing Revolt
By Francie Diep November 22, 2022

Less than one week after the dean of Yale Law School announced she would no longer cooperate with U.S. News & World Report on its annual rankings, several of her peers have followed suit. As of Tuesday, deans at 10 of the 15 top-ranked law schools had said they would stop sending their data to U.S. News.

The collective revolt came quickly — and with barbs. In their announcements, the deans criticized the algorithm that U.S. News analysts use to produce the rankings. “The rankings rely on flawed survey techniques and opaque and arbitrary formulas, lacking the transparency needed to help applicants make truly informed decisions,” wrote Kerry Abrams, dean of Duke Law. The methodology creates “perverse incentives,” wrote Jenny Martinez, Stanford Law School’s dean.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Less than one week after the dean of Yale Law School announced she would no longer cooperate with U.S. News & World Report on its annual rankings, several of her peers have followed suit. As of Tuesday, deans at 10 of the 15 top-ranked law schools had said they would stop sending their data to U.S. News.

The collective revolt came quickly — and with barbs. In their announcements, the deans criticized the algorithm that U.S. News analysts use to produce the rankings. “The rankings rely on flawed survey techniques and opaque and arbitrary formulas, lacking the transparency needed to help applicants make truly informed decisions,” wrote Kerry Abrams, dean of Duke Law. The methodology creates “perverse incentives,” wrote Jenny Martinez, Stanford Law School’s dean.

More fundamentally, the deans argued that the rankings hurt vulnerable students. “U.S. News stands in the way of progress for legal education and the profession,” Heather K. Gerken, dean of Yale Law School, told The Chronicle in an interview last week. “It’s made it harder for law schools to admit and support low-income students, and it’s undermining efforts to launch a generation to serve.”

Eric J. Gertler, chief executive of U.S. News, defended the rankings as a tool serving students. “What we do is provide a common set of metrics so that students can evaluate their choices to go law school,” he said. “Aspiring legal students, they’re spending tens of thousands of dollars and spending three years of their lives getting a legal degree. I think it’s important that they have the right information.”

If the law deans’ criticism sounds familiar, it’s because it echoes the complaints that have been leveled for decades against an even bigger project: the magazine’s ranking of undergraduate colleges and universities. There, too, critics have said the magazine’s metrics are flawed, opaque, and harm equity efforts.

But seldom have institutions acted on their concerns, as Yale and its peers have recently. And if elite colleges are willing to withdraw their support from one U.S. News ranking in the name of equity, why not another? In other words, is the undergraduate ranking the next venue for this kind of protest?

Not yet. The Chronicle called and emailed the main press offices of all 10 universities whose law deans have quit U.S. News, to ask whether they had considered withdrawing from the main ranking. Four answered. Columbia and Yale Universities’ responses emphasized that their law schools made their decisions independently from the main administration. Michigan had no comment. And Janet Gilmore, a spokeswoman for the University of California at Berkeley, wrote: “We support the decision of the law school and do not, at this time, have plans for the campus to withdraw from the college rankings.” None answered a question asking whether criticisms of the law-school list could apply to the undergraduate rankings as well.

It’s a great first step to get people to start to question what ‘U.S. News’ does and how they view educational quality.

Though they are similar, the metrics that underlie the two rankings have important differences. Reputation plays a key role in both. Forty percent of a law school’s ranking depends on reputation surveys the publication sends to law academics and professionals, while 20 percent of a university’s undergraduate ranking — the largest single variable — is based on the result of reputation surveys sent to other campuses. The law-school formula more heavily weighs incoming students’ test scores and grades (20 percent) than does the undergraduate formula (7 percent). Finally, the undergraduate algorithm has measures that take into account the rates at which Pell Grant recipients graduate. The law-school one has no equivalent.

Nevertheless, to critics, the rankings’ effects are similar enough that to cooperate with one but not the other is hypocritical. “It’s fascinating they go, ‘That graduate school methodology is trash. Oh, let’s not talk about the undergraduate,’” said Akil Bello, director of advocacy for the National Center for Fair and Open Testing and a longtime rankings critic.

The undergraduate ranking exerts a strong pull on the campuses that seek to climb it. Some institutions advertise their standing on billboards, while others incorporate the ranking into their strategic plans. Yet the U.S. News list has been the subject of persistent public controversy in recent years. Accusations of incorrect data submissions, such as those involving Columbia University and the University of Southern California’s school of education, have undermined trust in the ranking’s accuracy.

Add to those headlines the recent law-school withdrawals. But researchers who study rankings say that, while a protest from some of the most visible universities in the country is not nothing, rankings have endured for decades despite periods of pointed criticism. “I’m skeptical this is the end of U.S. News,” said Michael Sauder, a professor of sociology and coauthor of the book Engines of Anxiety: Academic Rankings, Reputation, and Accountability. “It’s a great first step to get people to start to question what U.S. News does and how they view educational quality.”

Bello thinks that to make a difference in students’ and families’ perceptions of rankings, the protesting law deans would have to undertake a sustained messaging campaign. They would need to stand up for perhaps several years in a row, whenever new rankings come out, and remind the public that they don’t believe in the rankings formula and don’t participate.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sauder said the schools to watch are not at the top of the list, but in the middle. If mid-ranked law schools began ditching the list, he said, then a more fundamental shift may be afoot. “They’re the schools that feel the most pressure from maximizing their numbers,” he said. Schools among the top 14 — considered by the law academy to be the elite — don’t depend on U.S. News for their reputations, but a lower-ranked school has more to lose by refusing to submit data, and therefore risking a lower ranking. (Historically, colleges that stop submitting data to U.S. News for the undergrad list fall in rank.) So far, the only non-top-14 law school to join the protest is the University of California at Los Angeles, which is No. 15 this year.

In the meantime, the protesting schools will still appear on the U.S. News list — and those colleges might one day decide to re-engage. In interviews with The Chronicle, Gerken and Erwin Chemerinsky, Berkeley Law’s dean, both said they haven’t shut their doors to the magazine forever. “If they were to change the formula in a way that doesn’t conflict with our mission,” Chemerinsky said, “I would have no trouble providing U.S. News with data in the future.”

A version of this article appeared in the December 9, 2022, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Admissions & Enrollment Assessment & Accreditation Data Cover Story
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
IMG_0023-removebg.png
About the Author
Francie Diep
Francie Diep is a senior reporter covering money in higher education. Email her at francie.diep@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin