Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
News

Justice Dept. Slams Harvard Admissions in Affirmative-Action Filing

By Lindsay Ellis August 30, 2018
Attorney General Jeff Sessions says Harvard has not conducted “its admissions policy without racial discrimination,” siding with the plaintiffs in a lawsuit brought on behalf of Asian-American students who had sought admission to the university.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions says Harvard has not conducted “its admissions policy without racial discrimination,” siding with the plaintiffs in a lawsuit brought on behalf of Asian-American students who had sought admission to the university.Chip Somodevilla, Getty Images

Harvard University’s consideration of Asian-American applicants “may be infected with racial bias,” the U.S. Department of Justice said on Thursday in a court filing that marked an escalation of the continuing battle over affirmative action.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Attorney General Jeff Sessions says Harvard has not conducted “its admissions policy without racial discrimination,” siding with the plaintiffs in a lawsuit brought on behalf of Asian-American students who had sought admission to the university.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions says Harvard has not conducted “its admissions policy without racial discrimination,” siding with the plaintiffs in a lawsuit brought on behalf of Asian-American students who had sought admission to the university.Chip Somodevilla, Getty Images

Harvard University’s consideration of Asian-American applicants “may be infected with racial bias,” the U.S. Department of Justice said on Thursday in a court filing that marked an escalation of the continuing battle over affirmative action.

The department’s statement of interest, which supports the conservative activist group Students for Fair Admissions Inc., accuses Harvard of systematically discriminating against Asian-Americans in an effort to balance the racial composition of its student body, a practice the department called “unlawful.”

The department’s ideological alliance with the plaintiffs was not surprising in a debate that has flared during Donald J. Trump’s presidency. But it is the first formal comment from the federal government on the case, which has opened windows into Harvard’s admissions procedures.

Among the department’s concerns, according to the filing, is the “personal rating” of applicants, which results in Asian-Americans’ receiving “the lowest scores of the four largest racial groups.” It said the university should seriously consider race-neutral alternatives. Attorney General Jeff Sessions said Harvard’s decision not to do so runs afoul of existing law.

Sessions said in a written statement that because Harvard receives taxpayer money in the form of federal student aid, the university must “conduct its admissions policy without racial discrimination” and use “meaningful admissions criteria.”

“The record evidence demonstrates that Harvard’s race-based admissions process significantly disadvantages Asian-American applicants compared to applicants of other racial groups — including both white applicants and applicants from other racial minority groups,” the filing reads.

In a statement, the university denied discriminating against any group and pledged to defend the legal right of any institution to consider race as a factor in the college admissions process. A spokeswoman said the statement was not surprising given the department’s recent repeal of Obama-era guidance on affirmative action.

“We are deeply disappointed that the Department of Justice has taken the side of Edward Blum and Students for Fair Admissions, recycling the same misleading and hollow arguments that prove nothing more than the emptiness of the case against Harvard,” a spokeswoman, Anna Cowenhoven, wrote in an email.

The university’s lawyers have previously said the plaintiff’s assertions about bias against Asian-Americans are based on “gerrymandered statistics.”

ADVERTISEMENT

University records show that race is among several nonacademic factors that Harvard considers in freshman admissions. Others include an interview, extracurricular activities, personal qualities, alumni relations, and work experience. Admitted first-year students for this fall were culled from a pool of nearly 43,000 applicants. Twenty-two percent of the admitted students are Asian-American, 15 percent are black, and 11 percent are Hispanic.

The Justice Department accused Harvard of manipulating the makeup of its incoming classes “to produce an admitted class that replicates its desired racial balance year in and year out,” even while asserting that “it employs no racial numerical goals.” Admissions officials do not receive guidance on how to use race in making decisions, according to the filing.

Students for Fair Admissions filed its lawsuit in 2014 and represents Asian-American applicants that Harvard rejected.

Edward J. Blum, who leads the group, helped craft the recent lawsuit challenging the University of Texas at Austin’s admissions practices. The Supreme Court in 2016 upheld UT-Austin’s use of race in admissions in a 4-to-3 decision. The expected rightward turn of the court, however, has cast doubt on just how settled that precedent is.

Update (8/30/2018, 4:06 p.m.): This article has been updated with a statement from Harvard University.
Lindsay Ellis is a staff reporter. Follow her on Twitter @lindsayaellis, or email her at lindsay.ellis@chronicle.com.

Read other items in Harvard on Trial.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Law & Policy Political Influence & Activism
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Ellis_Lindsay.jpg
About the Author
Lindsay Ellis
Lindsay Ellis, a reporter at The Wall Street Journal, previously covered research universities, workplace issues, and other topics for The Chronicle.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

In Court Battle Over Harvard Admissions, Plaintiffs Allege University Ignored ‘Negative Effects’ on Asian-Americans
Race-Conscious Admissions Policies Just Got Easier to Defend
Affirmative-Action Foe Plans Campaigns Against 3 Universities

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin