> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
News
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Kleptomania in Victorian Era Tied to Class and Sex

By  Ellen K. Coughlin
December 6, 1989

The definition of kleptomania as a disease in the second half of the 19th century was tied to Victorian assumptions about class and gender, according to a historian at Princeton University.

People diagnosed as kleptomaniacs in the late 19th century were almost always female and middle class, writes Elaine S. Abelson in the autumn issue of the journal Signs. The diagnosis arose partly, she argues, out of the medical belief at that time that mental instability in women was linked to their reproductive function. Menstrual disorders, uterine disease, and “ovarian insanity” were commonly given as root causes for the women’s kleptomania.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

The definition of kleptomania as a disease in the second half of the 19th century was tied to Victorian assumptions about class and gender, according to a historian at Princeton University.

People diagnosed as kleptomaniacs in the late 19th century were almost always female and middle class, writes Elaine S. Abelson in the autumn issue of the journal Signs. The diagnosis arose partly, she argues, out of the medical belief at that time that mental instability in women was linked to their reproductive function. Menstrual disorders, uterine disease, and “ovarian insanity” were commonly given as root causes for the women’s kleptomania.

At the same time, Ms. Abelson argues, diagnoses of kleptomania were also linked to class considerations: Middle-class respectability was so valued in the Victorian era that no member of the class could possibly be thought guilty of common theft.

Ms. Abelson offers as an example the highly publicized case of Ella and Walter Castle, a well-to-do American couple arrested in 1896 for stealing a sable muff from a fashionable London store. Both were indicted, and stolen goods were eventually found among his possessions, but Mr. Castle was eventually exonerated.

Mrs. Castle became the focus of the case, in which doctors and other experts testified to her “troubles incidental to female life” and her “excessive nervousness since the birth of her child.” Although she pleaded guilty and was convicted, British officials immediately deemed her mentally irresponsible and released her “on her husband’s promise to take care of her.”

ADVERTISEMENT

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin