Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    A Culture of Cybersecurity
    Opportunities in the Hard Sciences
    Career Preparation
Sign In
Illustration by Ellen Winkler and Robert McGrath show three students on each end of a balance, tilted up on one end under a colume building
Illustration by The Chronicle

Law Schools Should Abandon Merit-Based Scholarships

‘U.S. News’ rankings methods have encouraged the neglect of low-income students.

The Review | Opinion
By Tamara F. Lawson and Heather K. Gerken April 13, 2023

Higher education is facing a pivotal moment as leaders reckon with U.S. News & World Report’s rankings and the outsized role they play in setting the agenda.

As many have rightly explained, the rankings create perverse incentives with pernicious effects: Many institutions have implemented regrettable strategies to move up the magazine’s vaunted rankings — at the expense of good policy.

One of the most problematic impacts of U.S. News’s rankings is the effect its methodology has on low-income students, who need financial aid to access the opportunities they’ve earned. For decades, college leaders have used precious aid dollars to go after students with scores that can deliver a rankings boost. In our field, a top LSAT score has become a golden ticket to financial aid, even as many institutions allow lower-income students to struggle with higher tuition bills. Such practices keep law school financially out of reach for large numbers of highly qualified, indisputably meritorious applicants.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Higher education is facing a pivotal moment as leaders reckon with U.S. News & World Report’s rankings and the outsize role they play in setting the agenda.

As many have rightly explained, the rankings create perverse incentives with pernicious effects: Many institutions have adopted regrettable strategies to move up the magazine’s vaunted rankings — at the expense of good policy.

One of the most problematic aspects of U.S. News’s rankings is the effect its methodology has on low-income students, who need financial aid to take the opportunities they’ve earned. For decades, educational leaders have used precious aid dollars to pursue students with scores that can deliver a rankings boost. In our field, a top LSAT score has become a golden ticket to financial aid, even as many institutions allow lower-income students to struggle with higher tuition bills. Such practices keep law school financially out of reach for many highly qualified, indisputably meritorious applicants.

In our view, admissions decisions should be merit-based, and standardized-test scores and grade-point averages should continue to be important factors in those decisions. But once an applicant has earned a seat, financial aid should be based on need, and need alone.

Because of the current rankings formula, deans are under terrible pressure to focus on scores rather than need in awarding financial aid. As a result, need-based financial aid is eroding, while scholarship awards without regard to need are exploding. From 2005 to 2010 — before many of the merit scholarships that exist now were even created — data from the American Bar Association showed that the number of law students receiving need-based aid went from 20,781 to 17,610 (a drop of more than 3,000), while the number of students receiving merit scholarships went from 31,265 to 39,845 (an increase of more than 8,000). As a result, $230 million was pumped into merit scholarships during that time while only $23 million was allocated for need-based aid — one-tenth the amount.

In 2010 alone, law schools spent $522 million on merit scholarships and just $143 million for need-based aid. In 2016, Indiana University’s Center for Postsecondary Research asked 17,000 law students about their scholarships and found that 60 percent of them received merit-based awards while just 19 percent got need-based awards. Similarly, law schools without large endowments have strong incentives to offer tuition discounts to high-scoring students in order to raise their ranking, while low-income students pay full freight.

Once an applicant has earned a seat, financial aid should be based on need, and need alone.

Meanwhile, those needy students — who have overcome remarkable hurdles to be admitted — have debt piled on them or discover they cannot afford to take the seat that they have plainly earned. At a moment when economic inequality is at the center of public debate, U.S. News’s rankings methods have thus discouraged colleges from ensuring low-income students take advantage of the life-changing opportunities that higher education provides.

The statistics make clear why so many law deans have walked away from U.S. News. Fortunately, while a poorly conceived, nontransparent ranking system helped create this mess, transparent data and healthy competition are the solution. The ABA has played an important leadership role in publishing a common set of data to hold law schools accountable and inform students — all at no cost. We believe that the ABA now has a chance to do more to deal with this crucial problem in legal education.

ADVERTISEMENT

First, the ABA should collect data and release the breakdown of need-based aid vs. merit-based aid for every law school in its annual reports. Transparency is the first step toward encouraging schools to switch to a need-based-aid model and provide life-changing scholarships to the students who need them most. The amount of need-based aid a school provides should be a point of enormous pride and value for students, alumni, and faculty members alike. If the goal of rankings is to use data to create a race to the top, this is the place to start.

Second, the ABA can start gathering and publicizing data that clearly identifies which schools are admitting and supporting students from families whose income falls below the poverty line. If we want to ensure that talented admitted students are not left on the sidelines, we need to measure and value data that matters for the future of our profession: We should measure how many students below the poverty line attend each law school and how much aid they receive. At Yale Law School, just under 10 percent of the class comes from families whose income is below the poverty line, and every one of them has a full-tuition scholarship. These students have overcome enormous odds to get to law school. They’ve had to deal with problems their peers never encounter, including homelessness, crushing debt, and food insecurity. While wealthy and middle-class students look to their families as a safety net, these students must serve as the safety net for their own families.

We have reached an inflection point in higher education, with leaders across the country choosing not to participate in a rankings system that directly opposes their institutions’ core values. This is a moment to encourage all law schools, the gatekeepers of the profession, to ensure our gates are open to all — through the award of critical financial aid.

A version of this article appeared in the April 28, 2023, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Opinion Access & Affordability Admissions & Enrollment
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Tamara F. Lawson
Tamara F. Lawson is dean and professor of law at the University of Washington School of Law.
About the Author
Heather K. Gerken
Heather K. Gerken is a professor of law and dean of the Yale Law School.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Harvard University
'Deeply Unsettling'
Harvard’s Battle With Trump Escalates as Research Money Is Suddenly Canceled
Photo-based illustration of a hand and a magnifying glass focusing on a scene from Western Carolina Universiy
Equal Opportunity
The Trump Administration Widens Its Scrutiny of Colleges, With Help From the Internet
Santa J. Ono, president of the University of Michigan, watches a basketball game on the campus in November 2022.
'He Is a Chameleon'
At U. of Michigan, Frustrations Grew Over a President Who Couldn’t Be Pinned Down
Photo-based illustration of University of Michigan's president Jeremy Santa Ono emerging from a red shape of Florida
Leadership
A Major College-President Transition Is Defined by an About-Face on DEI

From The Review

Illustration showing a valedictorian speaker who's tassel is a vintage microphone
The Review | Opinion
A Graduation Speaker Gets Canceled
By Corey Robin
Illustration showing a stack of coins and a university building falling over
The Review | Opinion
Here’s What Congress’s Endowment-Tax Plan Might Cost Your College
By Phillip Levine
Photo-based illustration of a college building under an upside down baby crib
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Must Stop Infantilizing Everyone
By Gregory Conti

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin