Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
Sign In
BACKGROUNDER

Let’s Clarify a Few Things About the New ‘Adversity Score.’ (First, Stop Calling It That.)

By Eric Hoover May 23, 2019
The College Board has unveiled an “adversity score” to better measure test takers’ socioeconomic backgrounds.
The College Board has unveiled an “adversity score” to better measure test takers’ socioeconomic backgrounds.Joe Raedle, Getty Images

Alarm. Anger. Confusion. News of the College Board’s Environmental Context Dashboard has caused all of the above.

As The Chronicle reported last week, more than 50 colleges have been using a new online tool designed to give admissions offices a better understanding of applicants’ socioeconomic backgrounds — and the challenges they may have encountered. On Thursday the College Board hosted a webinar to clear up some misunderstandings. Here are five key takeaways.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

The College Board has unveiled an “adversity score” to better measure test takers’ socioeconomic backgrounds.
The College Board has unveiled an “adversity score” to better measure test takers’ socioeconomic backgrounds.Joe Raedle, Getty Images

Alarm. Anger. Confusion. News of the College Board’s Environmental Context Dashboard has caused all of the above.

As The Chronicle reported last week, more than 50 colleges have been using a new online tool designed to give admissions offices a better understanding of applicants’ socioeconomic backgrounds — and the challenges they may have encountered. On Thursday the College Board hosted a webinar to clear up some misunderstandings. Here are five key takeaways.

“Adversity score” is a problematic term. Yes, some admissions officials have used that shorthand phrase to convey what the dashboard does, which is to calculate an applicant’s “Overall Disadvantage Level,” on a scale of one to 100. The higher the number, the more disadvantaged the applicant. But that number is not really a “score” like an SAT score. That 1-to-100 number doesn’t affect an applicant’s SAT score or appear on score reports sent to colleges. So … expect some other term to emerge.

The tool doesn’t get personal. The dashboard lists each applicant’s SAT score (or concordant SAT score for an ACT taker), and shows how it compares with those of other students in his or her high school. Beyond that, the dashboard does not take into account a student’s personal characteristics. Nor is it meant to reduce an application’s qualitative aspects to a number. “The dashboard does not replace any individual information that a student provides in their application,” Joe Williams, senior director for higher education at the College Board, said on Thursday.

Everything else is environmental data. The dashboard uses publicly available federal statistics and aggregated College Board data to display two distinct measures of disadvantage: neighborhood-level and school-level. The former, drawn from census-tract data, is “more granular than a ZIP code,” Williams said. That can prove useful to admissions offices, which might lack a good lens for understanding the type of neighborhood an applicant comes from. (That neighborhood might look quite different from the one in which his or her high school is located.) High-school-level measures of disadvantage are based on weighted census-tract data for all students at the school.

This information isn’t necessarily redundant. Sure, most admissions offices already have a ton of information about applicants’ high schools. But keeping those high-school profiles up-to-date as more and more applications pour in from more and more places well beyond one’s campus? “That’s a real challenge,” John Barnhill, associate vice president for enrollment management at Florida State University, said on Thursday. The College Board refreshes the dashboard as more data become available. Though Barnhill said he was skeptical of the tool early on, its contextual information has helped the university identify and enroll disadvantaged applicants who warranted a closer look. And he suggested that the tool would help the university provide better support for students once they enroll.

For better or worse, the dashboard isn’t a revolutionary tool. More than four-fifths of colleges now piloting the dashboard report that it has often helped them evaluate students who are greatly disadvantaged, according the the College Board. Typically, it’s used to assess “small groups of applicants on the margins,” Williams said. In other words, it’s not ushering in a brave, new world of admissions as much as it’s helping some admissions offices refine or confirm their evaluations of some applicants. The College Board plans to expand the pilot to include more than 150 colleges this fall before making it widely available as a free service.

Eric Hoover writes about the challenges of getting to, and through, college. Follow him on Twitter @erichoov, or email him, at eric.hoover@chronicle.com.

A version of this article appeared in the June 7, 2019, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Admissions & Enrollment Innovation & Transformation
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Eric Hoover
About the Author
Eric Hoover
Eric Hoover writes about the challenges of getting to, and through, college. Follow him on Twitter @erichoov, or email him, at eric.hoover@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

Why Are SAT Takers Getting an ‘Adversity Score’? Here’s Some Context

More News

Illustration of a magnifying glass highlighting the phrase "including the requirements set forth in Presidential Executive Order 14168 titled Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government."
Policy 'Whiplash'
Research Grants Increasingly Require Compliance With Trump’s Orders. Here’s How Colleges Are Responding.
Photo illustration showing internal email text snippets over a photo of a University of Iowa campus quad
Red-state reticence
Facing Research Cuts, Officials at U. of Iowa Spoke of a ‘Limited Ability to Publicly Fight This’
Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues

From The Review

Football game between UCLA and Colorado University, at Folsom Field in Boulder, Colo., Sept. 24, 2022.
The Review | Opinion
My University Values Football More Than Education
By Sigman Byrd
Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin