> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
Accountability
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Michigan State Vows Transparency in New Independent Investigation of Nassar Scandal. People Are Skeptical.

By  Sarah Brown
June 21, 2019
Dana Nessel, attorney general of Michigan
Dana Nessel, attorney general of Michigan

As Michigan State University’s leaders tell it, there will now be an independent investigation and full accounting of how the institution handled Larry Nassar’s sexual abuse — with a report made public at the end.

Michigan State’s Board of Trustees announced on Friday that the university had decided to hire McDermott Will & Emery, a Chicago-based law firm, to run the investigation, after consulting with several of Nassar’s victims. The inquiry’s scope, timeline, and cost are unclear, pending further negotiations with university leaders, according to a statement.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

Dana Nessel, attorney general of Michigan
Dana Nessel, attorney general of Michigan

As Michigan State University’s leaders tell it, there will now be an independent investigation and full accounting of how the institution handled Larry Nassar’s sexual abuse — with a report made public at the end.

Michigan State’s Board of Trustees announced on Friday that the university had decided to hire McDermott Will & Emery, a Chicago-based law firm, to run the investigation, after consulting with several of Nassar’s victims. The inquiry’s scope, timeline, and cost are unclear, pending further negotiations with university leaders, according to a statement.

“The board has decided to rip off the Band-Aid,” said Brian Mosallam, a board member, at the trustee meeting. “There will be accountability.” Mosallam had been calling for an independent investigation for a year.

But critics are wondering just how independent the review will be, and how committed Michigan State really is to being held accountable for its role in and response to the Nassar scandal. The university employed the sports doctor for nearly two decades, and he abused many girls and young women who came to appointments at his Michigan State clinic.

Three victims of Larry Nassar — Kaylee Lorincz, Rachael Denhollander, and Lindsey Lemke — spoke in Lansing, Mich., in November 2017. Testimony by them and others at his sentencing hearing, in January 2018, undermined support for Michigan State’s president, Lou Anna K. Simon.
The Nassar Scandal and the Crisis of Michigan State’s President
Within a year the university lost two chief executives — Lou Anna K. Simon, sank by the scathing, heart-rending testimony of the sports doctor’s scores of victims, and John M. Engler, whose interim presidency ended amid a backlash over his bare-knuckled tactics.
  • With Criminal Charges Dismissed Against Michigan State’s Ex-President, Sex-Abuse Accountability Hits Skids Again
  • Michigan State’s Ex-President, Who Faces Criminal Charges, Will Retire With a $2.5-Million Payout
  • At Michigan State, a Disruptive Presidency That Few Could Muster the Will to End

ADVERTISEMENT

For one thing, the university has tried an “independent investigation” before, and its legitimacy has since fallen apart. Two years ago, Michigan State hired Patrick Fitzgerald, a former federal prosecutor, to review whether university administrators had known about Nassar’s abuse.

Fitzgerald concluded that Michigan State officials had done nothing wrong. But he didn’t issue a public report of his findings. The New York Times and The Detroit News then obtained a copy of his contract with the university, which suggested that he’d been hired to shield the university from legal liability.

After Fitzgerald wrapped up his review, Nassar was convicted of sexually abusing hundreds of victims and sentenced to decades in prison. And in the past year, three ex-university officials — Lou Anna K. Simon, the former president; William Strampel, a former dean and Nassar’s longtime boss; and Kathie Klages, a former gymnastics coach — have been criminally charged for their roles in the scandal. Strampel was convicted this month of neglect of duty and misconduct in office.

Simon said repeatedly during the last year of her presidency that another independent investigation was unnecessary because of Fitzgerald’s work.

On top of that controversy, Michigan State officials have balked at releasing thousands of documents requested by the Michigan attorney general’s office, which is conducting one of the many active investigations into the university. Michigan State has cited attorney-client privilege to justify withholding the documents.

ADVERTISEMENT

The attorney general, Dana Nessel, said on Friday that Michigan State “lacks the credibility necessary to conduct a legitimate investigation.”

‘A Culture of Indifference’

The attorney general’s office released a preliminary report into Michigan State’s handling of the Nassar scandal in December, and accused the university of fostering “a culture of indifference toward sexual assault, motivated by its desire to protect its reputation.”

In March, Nessel wrote in a letter to Dianne Y. Byrum, the board’s chair, that she’d heard the board was considering hiring an outside firm and that she was “puzzled by the purpose of this additional investigation.” The university’s board had explicitly asked the attorney general’s office to step in, she wrote, and yet due to the university’s lack of cooperation, investigators had been unable to do their jobs.

“It is unclear to me why the university would expend more public funds on yet another investigation if it will continue to withhold information from the public,” she wrote.

ADVERTISEMENT

But one of Nassar’s victims is pleading with the critics to reserve judgment. Rachael Denhollander said in a statement on Friday that she and two other survivors had been working with the board for seven months on selecting a firm and getting the review underway.

While the attorney general’s work is important, she said, the office has the authority to look into only criminal activity. The independent review will go further, delving into critical questions about institutional culture and how to correct past failings, she said.

Moreover, the firm will work closely with a committee of Nassar’s victims, she said. She also praised the backgrounds of the lead investigators and their experience in prosecuting sex crimes.

“It should have been done three years ago,” said Denhollander, a lawyer herself. “But it is not too late to begin doing what is right, and I support this first step in that direction, while remaining firm that the truth must be told, no matter what the cost.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Other universities embroiled in scandal, including Baylor University, Pennsylvania State University, and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, have also brought in firms to do independent reviews after the fact.

Those investigations have proved to be controversial. At Baylor, for instance, the firm of Pepper Hamilton never published a report of its findings about the university’s handling of sexual-assault cases involving football players, and its lawyers have faced criticism that they worked with board members to paint a slanted picture of the scandal.

Pepper Hamilton is now fighting legal challenges over its refusal to comply with court orders to turn over documents related to the investigation.

Sarah Brown writes about a range of higher-education topics, including sexual assault, race on campus, and Greek life. Follow her on Twitter @Brown_e_Points, or email her at sarah.brown@chronicle.com.

A version of this article appeared in the July 5, 2019, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Leadership & Governance
Sarah Brown
Sarah Brown is The Chronicle’s news editor. Follow her on Twitter @Brown_e_Points, or email her at sarah.brown@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

  • ‘Culture of Indifference’ and ‘Institutional Protection’ at Michigan State Stymied Investigation of Larry Nassar
  • After Report That 14 Knew of Doctor’s Abuse, Renewed Calls for Michigan State President to Resign
  • Michigan State Trustee Calls for University’s General Counsel to Resign
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin