Students at Emerson College protested last year in response to what they called the administration’s paltry response to racism on campus. A new survey by the American Council on Education explores how college presidents manage the tension between free speech and inclusion.David L. Ryan, Getty Images
Seventy percent of college presidents are somewhat or very concerned about the prospect of violence on their campuses as a result of issues related to free speech and inclusion, a new survey has found. The American Council on Education questioned 471 college presidents of both public and private institutions for the study, which was released on Tuesday.
Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for less than $10/month.
Don’t have an account? Sign up now.
A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.
If you need assistance, please contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com.
Students at Emerson College protested last year in response to what they called the administration’s paltry response to racism on campus. A new survey by the American Council on Education explores how college presidents manage the tension between free speech and inclusion.David L. Ryan, Getty Images
Seventy percent of college presidents are somewhat or very concerned about the prospect of violence on their campuses as a result of issues related to free speech and inclusion, a new survey has found. The American Council on Education questioned 471 college presidents of both public and private institutions for the study, which was released on Tuesday.
The wide-ranging survey comes at a time when many college leaders have wrestled with how to handle invitations extended to controversial speakers — including white supremacists like Richard B. Spencer — to appear on their campuses. The survey found that the most common methods leaders use to “manage the tension between free speech and inclusion on campus” include public statements that lay out institutional values, community forums, and the monitoring of social media “for potential causes for concern.”
Among the survey’s other findings:
Eighty-two percent of presidents said promoting inclusion was extremely important, while 74 percent said protecting free-speech rights was very important (98 percent rated both as either very important or extremely important).
Ninety-six percent of presidents, when asked to choose, would prefer allowing students to be exposed to many types of speech rather than protecting them by prohibiting speech.
Thirty-nine percent of presidents said they expected the tension between free speech and inclusion to worsen on campuses nationally.
Eighty-five percent of presidents said it was never acceptable for students to shout down speakers or try to prevent them from talking.
Presidents tend to lean on their deans of students, provosts, and general counsels when setting institutional policy on speech and inclusion.
