Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
Advice

Negotiation 101: Be Reasonable, Be Transparent

Candidates who won’t be happy teaching represent themselves as teachers in order to get jobs all the time. Don’t do that; it’s not good for anyone.

By Gene C. Fant Jr. March 25, 2014
negotiation-101.jpg
Illustration by The Chronicle; Photo by iStock

By now, you’ve probably heard about the scholar who had a tenure-track job offer rescinded after she tried negotiating on a number of terms. That incident has stoked a lot of talk on an important question: What’s the right way to go about negotiate an academic offer? We asked our experts to dole out some advice.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

By now, you’ve probably heard about the scholar who had a tenure-track job offer rescinded after she tried negotiating on a number of terms. That incident has stoked a lot of talk on an important question: What’s the right way to go about negotiate an academic offer? We asked our experts to dole out some advice.

Given the hiring climate we’re in, what advice would you give to young academics on negotiating?

Here’s the bottom line: Know the institution with which you are negotiating. Your doctoral-program mentors might try to convince you that you’re weak if you aren’t aggressive, or if you don’t treat the hiring institution as if it were a large research institution. Don’t let them. You must be reasonable.

In the horror story at Nazareth, the demands were significantly overreaching for a teaching institution. The salary tweak was not a problem, and neither were the maternity leave nor the number of course preps, but asking to delay the start date means that the candidate didn’t understand that classes must be taught by a full-time faculty member. This was echoed in the request for a pre-tenure sabbatical.

Those two demands alone mean that the candidate is wishing to be out of the classroom two years out of her first five, which is just not reasonable at a teaching institution where relationships with students and colleagues are important. Put another way, with a 24-hour load in philosophy, the candidate was proposing to be released from as many as 16 courses out of, potentially, 40. That’s a lot of classes. While maternity leave is not a problem at all legally or as an ideal, it would be another semester out of the classroom as well.

I always recommend that candidates be transparent in their objectives and in their goals. Don’t talk your way into a job that you will hate just to have a job. Candidates who won’t be happy teaching represent themselves as teachers in order to get jobs all the time. And the reverse happens as well. It is a buyer’s market out there right now, but applicants have to realize that every job, and every institution, has a certain reality and that being out of step with that reality helps no one.

One other factor that might be in play in the example of the blog: It is quite common for a hiring committee to be deeply divided between two finalists, or for the search committee to be at odds with the administration. At teaching institutions in particular, it is common for one candidate to be a very strong scholar and a promising teacher and the other to be a very strong teacher and a promising scholar.

With the pressures for institutional reputation constantly pressing on what can be mission creep, it is common for search committees to select the scholar over the teacher. But this runs contrary to the preferences of a large minority of the department and of the administration. If the scholar looks overly precious or high-maintenance, the opposition will leap into action and demand that the candidate be cut loose immediately and the runner-up selected. This is often what’s behind the rebound-offer post I wrote recently.

While it’s common wisdom that you shouldn’t negotiate if you’re not prepared for the other party to walk away, we’ve almost never heard of that actually happening. Have you?

I hear of these things happening from time to time, and it’s usually at teaching institutions when the candidate clearly doesn’t understand the mission. I know of a dean at a teaching institution who had a candidate who was very strong on scholarship and a strong teacher to boot, but the demands in the negotiations kept growing more onerous and, in reality, quite odd.

ADVERTISEMENT

He called his provost after a frustrating conversation with the candidate and said, “I’m done with this one. I have seen the future of these conversations, and I don’t have the time to keep this person happy.” He was ready to withdraw the offer the following day, but the candidate phoned the next morning and accepted. Deal done. Productive colleague.

Here’s what other academics had to say in the Negotiation 101 series:

  • David Evans: “Know Your Absolutes.”
  • Gene Fant: “Be Reasonable, Be Transparent.”
  • Paula M. Krebs: “Find Out What’s Really Negotiable.”
  • Allison M. Vaillancourt: “Stop Writing, Start Talking.”
  • Jonathan Rees: “At the Very Least, Negotiate Your Salary.”
  • Rob Jenkins: “At a Community College, It’s Take It or Leave It.”
  • Noliwe Rooks: “Women, Don’t Demur.”
  • David Leonard: “Don’t Play the Game.”
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Graduate Education The Workplace
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Gene C. Fant Jr.
Gene C. Fant Jr. is the president of North Greenville University, and a professor of English.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin