Program aims to improve America’s ability to recruit foreign graduate students
Academics and federal officials alike have been wrestling for a while over how to improve the United States’ ability to recruit foreign graduate students in science and technology. Now officials at the Fulbright Program are putting money behind that mission with a new grant to bring international Ph.D. students to the United States.
This fall 29 students from 27 countries began graduate studies supported by a new International Fulbright Science and Technology Award. Each Ph.D. student will receive $160,000 in federal support for their studies, as well as a five-year student visa.
“Science and technology have always been a substantial part of Fulbright,” says Thomas A. Farrell, deputy assistant secretary for academic programs at the State Department’s Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, which oversees the Fulbright Program. “But this new award is meant to send a signal about our desire to keep U.S. higher education at the pinnacle of research in these key fields.”
The science-and-technology Ph.D. award was in part a product of a January 2006 summit of higher-education and State Department officials and is meant to counter the perception of an unwelcoming United States that has been losing its ability to attract the brightest foreign students.
The new award is one of several categories of scholarships given through the Fulbright Program, which was established in 1946 and serves as America’s flagship international-exchange program. The federal government provided about $181-million in support for the 2007-8 Fulbright grants, according to Mr. Farrell.
In other areas of the Fulbright Program, officials continued an emphasis that began last year to increase recipients’ fluency in languages deemed critical for national security, like Mandarin and Arabic. A teaching-assistantship program that sends American students abroad to teach English was also expanded.
Mr. Farrell said Fulbright had tried to foster diversity among foreign applicants to U.S. programs by enabling some scholars to take intensive English courses. That way talented students from poor regions, who might be overlooked because they lack strong English skills, could attend graduate programs in the United States.
He said the effort to “move beyond the elites” with this plan, called Building the Fulbright Future, was gaining momentum.
As for the new science-and-technology Ph.D. program, Mr. Farrell said that American universities chipped in about $1.3-million, which allowed for four more awards to be granted, and that he hoped to have similar cooperation for future grants. His department has committed to awarding at least 40 international Ph.D. scholarships next year.
On these pages are profiles of two of this year’s recipients of the new science award, a look at the success of two California colleges in producing Fulbright students, and data on this year’s winners. Lists of this year’s Fulbright scholars from the United States and abroad are available on the Fulbright Web site (http://www.cies.org).
TOP PRODUCERS OF FULBRIGHT AWARDS FOR U.S. STUDENTS BY TYPE OF INSTITUTION, 2007-8 U. of Michigan at Ann Arbor | 37 | 119 | Yale U. | 27 | 109 | Brown U. | 25 | 69 | Northwestern U. | 24 | 90 | U. of California at Berkeley | 23 | 92 | Cornell U. | 21 | 73 | Harvard U. | 21 | 96 | U. of Chicago | 20 | 92 | Boston College | 18 | 51 | Stanford U. | 18 | 61 | U. of Wisconsin at Madison | 18 | 65 | Johns Hopkins U. | 17 | 45 | U. of Pennsylvania | 17 | 108 | Arizona State U. at Tempe | 16 | 45 | Columbia U. | 13 | 71 | Princeton U. | 13 | 63 | Tufts U. | 13 | 38 | Washington U. in St. Louis | 13 | 29 | U. of California at Los Angeles | 12 | 38 | College of William and Mary | 11 | 24 | Ohio State U. main campus | 11 | 34 | U. of Arizona | 11 | 45 | U. of Texas at Austin | 11 | 45 | Dartmouth College | 10 | 35 | Duke U. | 10 | 32 | New York U. | 10 | 57 | Fairfield U. | 5 | 27 | U. of Portland | 5 | 7 | Gallaudet U. | 4 | 7 | Pacific Lutheran U. | 4 | 12 | California State U. at Long Beach | 3 | 7 | Canisius College | 3 | 8 | Ithaca College | 3 | 5 | Mills College | 3 | 4 | Rollins College | 3 | 10 | Seattle U. | 3 | 8 | U. of Central Oklahoma | 3 | 4 | U. of Scranton | 3 | 8 | Valparaiso U. | 3 | 6 | Chapman U. | 2 | 3 | City U. of New York Bernard M. Baruch College | 2 | 2 | City U. of New York Queens College | 2 | 4 | Creighton U. | 2 | 5 | La Salle U. | 2 | 3 | Truman State U. | 2 | 5 | U. of Wisconsin at Eau Claire | 2 | 4 | Whitworth U. | 2 | 3 | Pomona College | 25 | 51 | Smith College | 14 | 31 | Wellesley College | 11 | 24 | Vassar College | 10 | 35 | Wesleyan U. | 10 | 26 | Whitman College | 10 | 23 | Mount Holyoke College | 9 | 29 | Wheaton College (Mass.) | 9 | 22 | Hamilton College (N.Y.) | 8 | 21 | Kenyon College | 8 | 20 | Pitzer College | 8 | 77 | St. Olaf College | 8 | 24 | Swarthmore College | 8 | 24 | Bowdoin College | 7 | 24 | New College of Florida | 7 | 10 | Bryn Mawr College | 6 | 16 | Connecticut College | 5 | 13 | Kalamazoo College | 5 | 8 | Macalester College | 5 | 11 | Washington and Lee U. | 5 | 9 | Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art | 4 | 8 | Grinnell College | 4 | 19 | Lafayette College | 4 | 5 | Manchester College | 4 | 8 | Occidental College | 4 | 24 | Spelman College | 4 | 7 | Williams College | 4 | 28 | Barnard College | 3 | 10 | Claremont McKenna College | 3 | 28 | Colgate U. | 3 | 17 | College of the Holy Cross | 3 | 18 | Denison U. | 3 | 15 | DePauw U. | 3 | 8 | Dickinson College | 3 | 9 | Earlham College | 3 | 6 | Georgetown College | 3 | 4 | Hendrix College | 3 | 6 | Nebraska Wesleyan U. | 3 | 13 | Oberlin College | 3 | 29 | Trinity College (Conn.) | 3 | 8 | U. of Puget Sound | 3 | 15 | U. of Richmond | 3 | 13 | Willamette U. | 3 | 14 | School of the Art Institute of Chicago | 5 | 15 | Rhode Island School of Design | 2 | 14 | Babson College | 1 | 1 | Brooklyn Law School | 1 | 3 | Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering | 1 | 1 | Juilliard School | 1 | 6 | Manhattan School of Music | 1 | 3 | Maryland Institute College of Art | 1 | 5 | North Carolina School of the Arts | 1 | 3 | U. of California Hastings College of Law | 1 | 3 | William Mitchell College of Law | 1 | 1 | NOTE: Institutions are grouped according to the 2005 classification done by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. The group of other institutions includes two-year, specialized, and unclassified institutions. A complete list of institutions is available at http://us.fulbrightonline.org | SOURCE: Institute of International Education | |
COUNTRIES SENDING MOST FULBRIGHT STUDENTS TO U.S., 2007-8 Germany | 223 | Pakistan* | 178 | Colombia | 73 | Indonesia | 72 | Turkey | 67 | Russia | 64 | Chile | 59 | Brazil | 57 | Mexico | 51 | Spain | 41 | Afghanistan | 37 | Ecuador | 36 | Iraq | 32 | Argentina | 26 | India | 26 | Japan | 25 | The Netherlands | 25 | Belgium | 24 | Israel | 23 | Ukraine | 23 | France | 22 | New Zealand | 22 | Norway | 22 | Italy | 20 | NOTE: The number of Fulbright grants available in each country is determined by the funds provided by that country and the United States. * Financed in partnership with U.S. Agency for International Development. | SOURCES: Institute of International Education; America-Mideast Educational and Training Services (Amideast); Laspau: Academic and Professional Programs for the Americas | |
COUNTRIES SENDING MOST FULBRIGHT SCHOLARS TO U.S., 2007-8 China | 46 | Russia | 31 | Taiwan | 30 | Korea | 28 | Argentina | 23 | India | 19 | Ukraine | 19 | Czech Republic | 18 | Israel | 17 | Mexico | 16 | Japan | 15 | Egypt | 14 | Turkey | 12 | Canada | 11 | Netherlands | 10 | Hungary | 9 | Kazakhstan | 9 | Norway | 9 | Poland | 9 | Belgium and Luxembourg | 8 | Brazil | 8 | Ireland | 8 | Pakistan | 8 | Vietnam | 8 | Australia | 7 | Germany | 7 | Greece | 7 | Italy | 7 | Romania | 7 | France | 6 | Morocco | 6 | New Zealand | 6 | Nigeria | 6 | Philippines | 6 | South Africa | 6 | Azerbaijan | 5 | Bulgaria | 5 | Finland | 5 | Georgia | 5 | Jordan | 5 | Kyrgyzstan | 5 | Sri Lanka | 5 | NOTE: The list includes confirmed recipients as of September 27. | SOURCE: Institute of International Education | |
http://chronicle.com Section: International Volume 54, Issue 9, Page A42