Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    A Culture of Cybersecurity
    Opportunities in the Hard Sciences
    Career Preparation
Sign In
News

No-Confidence Vote at Cal State Stems Partly From Chronicle Essay

By Paul Fain November 22, 2009

There are plenty of reasons for anxiety and perhaps even unrest at California State University-Stanislaus. The campus is coping this year with a $13.5-million budget cut, which has led to furloughs, reduced enrollment, and the elimination of a winter term. But when faculty critics explain why they voted no confidence last week in the university’s president, Hamid Shirvani, Exhibit A is a commentary he wrote for The Chronicle.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

There are plenty of reasons for anxiety and perhaps even unrest at California State University-Stanislaus. The campus is coping this year with a $13.5-million budget cut, which has led to furloughs, reduced enrollment, and the elimination of a winter term. But when faculty critics explain why they voted no confidence last week in the university’s president, Hamid Shirvani, Exhibit A is a commentary he wrote for The Chronicle.

The no-confidence resolution passed with the support of 91 percent of those eligible to vote, including professors, coaches, librarians, and academic administrators. Faculty leaders said Mr. Shirvani has led a sustained attack on shared governance, is responsible for high administrative turnover, has mismanaged finances, and has made several public gaffes.

But while the votes were being counted last week, professors singled out in particular the commentary, as did the systemwide faculty union.

In a news release distributed on Thursday, the California Faculty Association said it would soon publish a white paper alleging that the system’s leaders were attempting to make radical changes at the university under the cover of a money crisis. The chief example mentioned in the news release is Mr. Shirvani’s essay, which union leaders said was evidence that he views budget cuts as an opportunity to “re-engineer education” in a way that reduces Californians’ sense of “entitlement” to a college education.

No Regrets

The essay in question was published on October 18 with the headline “Will a Culture of Entitlement Bankrupt Higher Education?” In it Mr. Shirvani makes a broad-ranging plea for what he sees as pragmatic solutions to the economic challenges faced by colleges and universities across the nation.

Mr. Shirvani wrote that governments and taxpayers must be reminded of their shared responsibility for public education, but that the only way universities can “persuade them to invest in higher education is to demonstrate our commitment to efficiency, openness, and accountability.”

Mr. Shirvani says the sense of entitlement has led to “country-club-quality recreational facilities and multitudes of majors and minors,” as well as the rankings-driven obsession with status. He does not argue for less access to higher education, but says that students and their families will have to pay more for it.

In an interview on Friday, before the votes had been tallied, Mr. Shirvani said that he did not regret writing the opinion piece, and that he had considered writing again for the newspaper.

“What I said in the article is my conviction,” he said, adding that the approach described in the essay had driven his strategic decision making as president. Perhaps the most high-profile and controversial of those decisions was the elimination of the university’s four-week winter term. That move, announced in October and effective next year, means the university’s fall and spring semesters will be lengthened by two weeks.

Mr. Shirvani said only 5 percent of full-time faculty members teach during the winter term. The change will result in more availability, and more work weeks, for professors. But faculty leaders questioned Mr. Shirvani’s claim that the new academic schedule would save $2-million. They also said he ignored faculty and student input over the term’s future—one of several cases they cited of Mr. Shirvani’s allegedly top-down management style.

Difficult Times

The university, like the rest of the 23-campus California State University system, must deal with severe budget gaps. The system’s state contribution was cut by $564-million this year. Cal State’s leaders are trimming overall enrollment by 40,000. Stanislaus, one of the system’s smallest campuses, is located in California’s agrarian Central Valley. The university’s enrollment is 6,800, down 500 from last year, and will be reduced by 250 more students next year.

ADVERTISEMENT

About $4.5-million of the university’s $13.5-million budget hole was covered with savings from furloughs of two days per month for all employees, with some flexibility for department heads. That works out to pay cuts of approximately 10 percent, said Russell Giambelluca, the university’s vice president for business and finance. Mr. Giambelluca said a handful of administrators, but no faculty members, had been laid off.

“It saved us a lot of jobs,” he said of the furloughs. Mr. Giambelluca was reached on Friday at his home because he, like most university administrators and staff members, was taking a furlough day.

Mr. Shirvani, who was in his office, defended his relationship with professors. He said that the fracture began with the money woes of the last two years and that his most vocal critics were a small group. The president, who is an architect and urban planner, does have his fans. The California State Student Association has named him the system’s “president of the year” for two of the last three years.

Faculty leaders, however, have stressed that their complaints about Mr. Shirvani are not related to anxiety over budgets. In a written statement supporting the no-confidence measure, members of the Academic Senate wrote that the president “has acted with intemperate haste and lack of adequate forethought.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“His reckless behavior and erratic decision making,” they wrote, “imperil the academic standing of the university.”

The no-confidence vote is the fourth such faculty rebuke of a university leader in the California State University system over the last three years, including one passed in July by the California Faculty Association over the leadership of Charles B. Reed, the system’s chancellor.

“It will take some time to redevelop trust and good faith in the office of the president,” said John A. García, a professor of social work on the Stanislaus campus, in a written statement. “We await his efforts in that direction.”

A spokeswoman in the system office said Mr. Reed and the system’s governing board have full confidence in Mr. Shirvani.

ADVERTISEMENT

While Mr. Shirvani said he was not surprised that his essay had rankled some people on the campus, he said he did not think professors would take his points personally. For example, he said that he had aimed comments about productivity at a national audience, rather than specifically at his university, and that no plans to systemically increase faculty teaching were in the works.

But he said he understood that many professors were upset about the difficult times at the university.

“We have to try to do things differently,” Mr. Shirvani said. “Faculty in the university have to understand that they’re not immune from the changes and adjustments that the society is going through.”

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Leadership & Governance
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Harvard University
'Deeply Unsettling'
Harvard’s Battle With Trump Escalates as Research Money Is Suddenly Canceled
Photo-based illustration of a hand and a magnifying glass focusing on a scene from Western Carolina Universiy
Equal Opportunity
The Trump Administration Widens Its Scrutiny of Colleges, With Help From the Internet
Santa J. Ono, president of the University of Michigan, watches a basketball game on the campus in November 2022.
'He Is a Chameleon'
At U. of Michigan, Frustrations Grew Over a President Who Couldn’t Be Pinned Down
Photo-based illustration of University of Michigan's president Jeremy Santa Ono emerging from a red shape of Florida
Leadership
A Major College-President Transition Is Defined by an About-Face on DEI

From The Review

Photo illustration of Elon Musk and the Dome of the U.S. Capitol
The Review | Opinion
On Student Aid, It’s Congressional Republicans vs. DOGE
By Robert Gordon, Jordan Matsudaira
Photo-based illustration of a closeup of a blue-toned eye with a small hand either pushing or pulling a red piece of film over the top
The Review | Essay
We Don’t Need More Administrators Inspecting Our Ideas
By Nicolas Langlitz
Solomon-0512 B.jpg
The Review | Essay
The Conscience of a Campus Conservative
By Daniel J. Solomon

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin