Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    University Transformation
Sign In
The Review

Now, More Than Ever, Scholarly Groups Must Engage in the Political Arena

By Neve Gordon March 6, 2017
Mesa REMOVE

Since I am only familiar with his work on American poetry and cultural studies, I did not realize that Cary Nelson, former president of the American Association of University Professors, is a member of the Middle East Studies Association. But, then, last week I received an email from him encouraging me, “as a fellow MESA member,” to vote against a proposal to remove the word “non-political” from the association’s bylaws.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Since I am only familiar with his work on American poetry and cultural studies, I did not realize that Cary Nelson, former president of the American Association of University Professors, is a member of the Middle East Studies Association. But, then, last week I received an email from him encouraging me, “as a fellow MESA member,” to vote against a proposal to remove the word “non-political” from the association’s bylaws.

That vote, which closes on March 15, will also determine if the association adds a clause reaffirming its commitment to operate “in accordance with its status as a 501(c)(3) scientific, educational, literary, and charitable organization.” Even though the word “non-political” does not appear in the bylaws of most academic associations in the United States, Nelson believes that the “transformation of MESA into a political, rather than academic, organization will have multiple consequences,” as he wrote in an email inviting me to sign an open letter recommending against the change.

I have never met Nelson in person. However, in 2009 I benefited from his support. At the time, he defended my academic freedom when I was being subjected to personal attacks from my own university and Israel’s minister of education after I criticized Israel’s policies toward the colonized Palestinians. “The notion,” Nelson wrote, “that a political scientist cannot combine academic arguments with conclusions, theory with advocacy, strikes at the heart of the principle that academics have the right to advise the public and seek an impact on public policy.”

Citing Matthew W. Finkin and Robert C. Post’s book, For the Common Good: Principles of American Academic Freedom (Yale University Press, 2009), Nelson went on to claim that “faculty speech in scholarly venues and in the classroom cannot be protected (and cannot fully serve society) if faculty members are not also free to deploy their expertise in the public sphere without fear of government or university reprisal.” Nelson concluded: “As a political scientist who writes about Israeli policy, [Gordon] has a disciplinary justification to offer advice and opinion in the public sphere.”

People, no doubt, change their minds, but in this case it’s as if Nelson pines for a time when politics and scholarship were separate. Or at least segregated. The scenario he imagines is about as real and desirable as the idea of making America great again.

Notwithstanding the existing wording of the bylaws, MESA has been political for quite a while, and perhaps since its inception. Consider MESA’s Committee on Academic Freedom, which speaks up on behalf of scholars, teachers, and students throughout the Middle East, North Africa, and North America. The committee has written scores of letters over the past 15 years to support a broad and vigorous sense of academic freedom. Is it not already “political” to take a public stance against states, governments, and institutions that violate academic freedom? And what about the newly established Task Force on Civil and Human Rights? As these two committees indicate, MESA is already engaged in work that might fairly be called “political.”

Particularly in the age of Trump, it is paramount that faculty and academic institutions enter the political arena.

In an open letter supporting the change in the bylaws, 12 former MESA presidents explain that “rather than protecting our status, [the word “non-political”] leaves us more vulnerable than the rest of our peer organizations” since it threatens the association’s legal standing when it intervenes in political debates or when it responds to the arrest and intimidation of Turkish, Kurdish, Egyptian, Iranian, Bahraini, and other academics.

The vote to erase the word “non-political” is, of course, not only motivated by the desire to guarantee that the bylaws will finally concur with the association’s existing operations and therefore protect its legal standing, but is also — and importantly — a normative stance about what MESA should do.

Elyse Semerdjian from Whitman College, who has been a MESA member for more than 20 years, explains that since 9/11, scholars of the Middle East have spent a great deal of time thinking about and acting on issues of academic freedom, civil rights, and human rights in the United States and abroad. “We do this,” she says, “as an extension of our academic work in order to protect our workspace by speaking out on behalf of vulnerable colleagues who live and work in conflict zones. This work, which has come natural to us as an organization, certainly cannot be construed as apolitical. However, this work is, and should be, advocacy work to protect academic freedom (in all its forms, including speech we find morally repugnant), because our colleagues look to us when they are wrongfully fired, imprisoned, attacked, and bombed.”

Particularly in the age of Trump, in which concrete threats to academic freedoms are likely to increase, it is paramount that faculty and academic institutions, ranging from universities to professional associations, enter the political arena. This is exactly what the presidents of 48 colleges and universities did when President Trump issued the executive order banning Muslims. They did not hesitate to take a clear political stand against the order. This kind of advocacy is absolutely vital if we are to sustain the intellectual creativity and indeed the raison d’être of universities and research.

Does Nelson really believe that scholarly organizations in general should sit quietly as the scope of free inquiry is attacked? Or does he have particular reservations about this professional association? He stands in defense of a long-debunked notion of objective scholarship, which ultimately translates into an abdication of our professional and moral responsibility. But surrender, not least to the powers that be, is also a political act.

Neve Gordon is a visiting professor in the department of politics and international studies at SOAS, University of London.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

Why the Middle East Studies Association Must Remain ‘Non-Political’

More News

Mangan-Censorship-0610.jpg
Academic Freedom
‘A Banner Year for Censorship’: More States Are Restricting Classroom Discussions on Race and Gender
On the day of his retirement party, Bob Morse poses for a portrait in the Washington, D.C., offices of U.S. News and World Report in June 2025. Morse led the magazine's influential and controversial college rankings efforts since its inception in 1988. Michael Theis, The Chronicle.
List Legacy
‘U.S. News’ Rankings Guru, Soon to Retire, Reflects on the Role He’s Played in Higher Ed
Black and white photo of the Morrill Hall building on the University of Minnesota campus with red covering one side.
Finance & operations
U. of Minnesota Tries to Soften the Blow of Tuition Hikes, Budget Cuts With Faculty Benefits
Photo illustration showing a figurine of a football player with a large price tag on it.
Athletics
Loans, Fees, and TV Money: Where Colleges Are Finding the Funds to Pay Athletes

From The Review

A stack of coins falling over. Motion blur. Falling economy concept. Isolated on white.
The Review | Opinion
Will We Get a More Moderate Endowment Tax?
By Phillip Levine
Photo illustration of a classical column built of paper, with colored wires overtaking it like vines of ivy
The Review | Essay
The Latest Awful EdTech Buzzword: “Learnings”
By Kit Nicholls
William F. Buckley, Jr.
The Review | Interview
William F. Buckley Jr. and the Origins of the Battle Against ‘Woke’
By Evan Goldstein

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: A Global Leadership Perspective
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin