> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
News
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

On Election Day, Here’s What Higher Ed Should Watch For

By  Dan Bauman
November 5, 2018
1105 Voting Guide
Scott Olson, Getty Images

Here we go again. Tuesday’s midterm elections might be, first and foremost, a referendum on the presidency of Donald J. Trump, but voters will also have their say on a broad range of issues affecting higher education, including the free-college movement and Betsy DeVos, the nation’s education secretary. Here’s The Chronicle’s guide to the races and trends to watch for as the returns roll in on Tuesday night.

What’s next for the free-college and college-affordability movements?

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

1105 Voting Guide
Scott Olson, Getty Images

Here we go again. Tuesday’s midterm elections might be, first and foremost, a referendum on the presidency of Donald J. Trump, but voters will also have their say on a broad range of issues affecting higher education, including the free-college movement and Betsy DeVos, the nation’s education secretary. Here’s The Chronicle’s guide to the races and trends to watch for as the returns roll in on Tuesday night.

What’s next for the free-college and college-affordability movements?

In the final weeks of the campaign, health care and immigration have been the dominant themes. But higher education has emerged as an issue in several closely watched gubernatorial races, with candidates campaigning on free-college and College Promise programs.

In Maryland’s race for governor, the Democratic challenger, Ben Jealous, has proposed free community college for the state’s residents. Jealous also wants to make college free for students who plan to enter in-demand professions, and has said he would seek to eliminate the need for student loans at all four-year public colleges.

Shortly after Jealous announced those proposals, the Republican incumbent, Larry Hogan, proposed expanding Maryland’s tuition-free program, originally centered on community colleges, to include four-year institutions as well.

ADVERTISEMENT

In Arizona, the Democratic candidate, David Garcia, has proposed making community-college tuition free for students who remain on track to receive a two-year degree. And if he becomes Connecticut’s next governor, Ned Lamont, a Democrat, wants the state to pay for the first two years of community college for any Connecticuters who commit to living and working in the state after they graduate.

Democrats have certainly become more vocal on the issue since Sen. Bernie Sanders’s run for president in 2016. A review by Inside Higher Ed found that nearly 10 Democratic gubernatorial candidates are running on some kind of free-college plan.

But the free-college movement isn’t just in the hands of governors. In Seattle, voters will be asked if property-tax revenue should be allocated to a free-college program for graduates of the city’s public schools.

Will voters give “Education Governor” Scott Walker a third term?

Wisconsin’s Republican governor, Scott Walker, became a darling of the right for his successful push to change collective-bargaining rules in the state. His hard-fought victory made him plenty of enemies on Wisconsin campuses; his subsequent proposals to cut $300 million from the University of Wisconsin’s budget, and to remove tenure protections from state law, ruffled even more feathers.

ADVERTISEMENT

Now Walker faces a sharp challenge from the state’s school superintendent, Tony Evers, a Democrat. So the governor has tried to transform himself. As the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel explains: “Knowing he would be under attack on the issue, Walker proclaimed himself ‘the education governor’ and has aired ads touting a $649 million increase in funding for public schools that the governor proposed.”

On higher ed, Walker has bragged to voters about freezing tuition at campuses in the Wisconsin system over the last six years. But Evers says those freezes, as well as a $250-million cut in funds for the UW system in 2015, are “destroying higher education in Wisconsin.” Will Walker’s rebranding work? The race is close, but many analysts think Evers has the upper hand.

Other gubernatorial races to watch.

In Illinois, the Democratic nominee, J.B. Pritzker, has hammered the Republican governor, Bruce V. Rauner, for deep cuts in higher education that occurred during a protracted stalemate between Rauner and lawmakers over the state budget. Rauner’s opponents say the loss of appropriations led nearly 20,000 Illinois students to seek higher education outside the state in 2016 alone.

Pritzker wants funding for the state’s universities and community colleges to be returned to the levels prevailing before Rauner’s election. For his part, Rauner has championed greater collaboration between the business community and universities in Chicago. He has said a booming economy will stimulate greater tax revenue, thereby enabling the state to spend more on higher education. Polling throughout the race has put the incumbent far behind.

ADVERTISEMENT

In Oregon, the Republican candidate, Knute Buehler, told The Oregonian that the Democratic incumbent, Kate Brown, hadn’t done enough to raise college-going rates. Brown said she is proud of her work in reforming the state’s college-funding formula to reflect performance rather than enrollment.

And in Ohio, the former chief of the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Richard Cordray, wants voters to elect him the state’s next governor. Cordray has run on his record as a watchdog at the CFPB, which frequently tussled with student-loan companies. Seeking to counter that image, Cordray’s Republican opponent, Mike DeWine, has cast Cordray as a Washington insider who mismanaged the agency. The current governor, John R. Kasich, is barred from running for re-election by a term-limits law.

Did students have trouble voting?

With close races being contested at the federal and state levels across the country, election watchers will pay special attention to students’ ability to vote. An early-voting location at Texas State University was closed just three days after it began operating, but it has since reopened after an outcry. In Florida, early-voting stations on college campuses almost didn’t open because of a ban on campus locations imposed by Ken Detzner, the Republican secretary of state. A court order striking down the ban eventually opened up the polls closer to where students live and study.

ADVERTISEMENT

Similarly, a judge struck down a law in New Hampshire that would have required students to prove they lived in the place they were voting. And in North Dakota, college students, in addition to Native Americans, could find it more difficult to vote because of a new voter-identification law.

This year’s ballot measures include questions of funding, the culture wars, and an unusual amendment in Florida.

Along with the free-college ballot initiative in Seattle, other governments are seeking direct input from voters on issues of higher education. In Maine, New Jersey, New Mexico, and Rhode Island, voters will decide on bond measures financing construction projects on their states’ colleges campuses, as well as for career-development programs.

In Montana, voters will be asked — as they are every 10 years — if they wish to continue taxing real estate and personal property to support the Montana University system for another decade. (They’ve voted “yes” in every decade since 1948.)

In Maryland, a measure would use revenue from video lotteries to support “opportunities for career and technical education programs that lead to a job skill or certificate, and allow students to obtain college credit and degrees while in high school at no cost to the student.”

ADVERTISEMENT

In Massachusetts, voters will have the option of repealing a law enabling transgender people to access areas, such as bathrooms and locker facilities, based on their gender identification. The most recent polls have indicated that more than 70 percent of voters want to defeat the measure and keep the law on the books.

And in Florida, a sprawling measure will first ask voters if Floridians should provide death benefits to the spouses of first responders and active-duty members of the military. The measure does not mention that those benefits are already codified into law at various levels of government.

Those obviously popular provisions are accompanied by two other proposals that would have a real impact on higher ed. The first: Public colleges would be able to increase tuition only with a “supermajority” vote of their own Board of Trustees and another one by the state’s Board of Governors. The second would enshrine the structure of the state’s system of higher education in the Florida Constitution.

Academics on the ballot.

More than two dozen current and former academics are running for election in federal and state legislatures against incumbent representatives. Here is a list of races to watch. Let us know if there are others we missed.

ADVERTISEMENT


NameAcademic titleInstitutionPartyOfficeDistrictMedia call (unofficial)
Bobby McCool Chief institutional officer Big Sandy Community and Technical College R State House KY-97 Win
Beth Liston Associate professor Ohio State U. D State House OH-21 Win
Donna Shalala Former president University of Miami D U.S. House FL-27 Win
Lauren Underwood Adjunct professor Georgetown U. D U.S. House IL-14 Win
Katherine Porter Professor U. of California at Irvine D U.S. House CA-45 Uncalled
Carolyn Bourdeaux Associate professor Georgia State U. D U.S. House GA-07 Uncalled
Lee V. Mangold Adjunct professor U. of Central Florida D State House FL-28 Loss
Paul R. Stoddard Associate professor (former) Northern Illinois U. D State House IL-70 Loss
Alberta Griffin Instructor and doctoral fellow Western Michigan U. D State House MI-61 Loss
Bob Bergland Professor Missouri Western State U. D State House MO-09 Loss
Ryan Rebecca Taylor Lecturer Wright State U. D State House OH-40 Loss
Jay Clark Adjunct instructor Maryville College (Tenn.) D State House TN-08 Loss
Deane Arganbright Professor (former) Whitworth U. (et al.) D State House TN-76 Loss
Carter Turner Associate director of advancement Radford U. D State House VA-08 Loss
Brent Ottaway Associate professor Saint Francis U. D State House PA-13 Loss
Stephany Rose Spaulding Director, women’s and ethnic studies department U. of Colorado at Colorado Springs D U.S. House CO-05 Loss
Nancy E. Soderberg Professor U. of North Florida D U.S. House FL-06 Loss
Junius Rodriguez Professor Eureka College D U.S. House IL-18 Loss
Paul Walker Professor Murray State University D U.S. House KY-01 Loss
Randy Wadkins Professor U. of Mississippi D U.S. House MS-01 Loss
Anthony Pappas Associate professor St. John’s U. (N.Y.) R U.S. House NY-14 Loss
Tracy Mitrano Director (former), internet culture, policy, and law Cornell University D U.S. House NY-23 Loss
Dana Balter Visiting assistant teaching professor Syracuse U. D U.S. House NY-24 Loss
Beverly Goldstein Professor (former) Cleveland State U. R U.S. House OH-11 Loss
Susan Boser Professor and assistant chair Indiana U. in Pennsylvania D U.S. House PA-15 Loss
Martin E. Olsen Professor East Tennessee State U. D U.S. House TN-01 Loss
Miguel A. Levario Associate professor Texas Tech U. D U.S. House TX-19 Loss
Rey Gonzalez Adjunct professor (former) U. of Texas at Brownsville R U.S. House TX-34 Loss
Shireen S. Ghorbani Communications officer U. of Utah D U.S. House UT-02 Loss
Carolyn Long Professor Washington State U. at Vancouver D U.S. House WA-03 Loss
Lisa Brown Chancellor (former) Washington State U. at Spokane D U.S. House WA-05 Loss
Kendra Huard Fershee Professor West Virginia U. D U.S. House WV-01 Loss

Updated at 11/8/2018, 1:24 p.m.

On civil-rights policy, it may be House Democrats vs. Betsy DeVos.

If Democrats retake control of the U.S. House of Representatives, their current ranking member on the Committee on Education and the Workforce, Rep. Bobby Scott of Virginia, would probably be selected as the committee’s chairman. Scott’s background as a former civil-rights lawyer has led to speculation that he would exercise his oversight powers to examine the Education Department’s civil-rights policies, which have been changed — softened, critics say — under DeVos.

Democrats have sought to tie the unpopular DeVos to their Republican opponents. In California, Katie Porter, a Democrat, has tried to cast her opponent, U.S. Rep. Mimi Walters, as in league with DeVos on issues like the rollback of Obama-era Title IX policies. Other candidates have produced similar ads.

Dan Bauman is a reporter who investigates and writes about all things data in higher education. Tweet him at @danbauman77 or email him at dan.bauman@chronicle.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Law & PolicyPolitical Influence & ActivismGender
Dan Bauman
Dan Bauman is a reporter who investigates and writes about all things data in higher education. Tweet him at @danbauman77, or email him at dan.bauman@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

  • The Oddest Ballot Measure on Higher Ed? Look to Florida
  • How a College Degree ‘Supercharges’ a Divide Among White Voters
  • Professors Running for Office Make Final Push in First-Time Campaigns
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin