Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Student Housing
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Commentary

On the Eternal Recurrence of Commencement

By Robert Zaretsky May 29, 2015
For faculty members, Commencement Day can sometimes feel like “Groundhog Day” (above), the movie where Bill Murray’s character was forced to live the same day over and over again.
For faculty members, Commencement Day can sometimes feel like “Groundhog Day” (above), the movie where Bill Murray’s character was forced to live the same day over and over again. Louis Goldman, Columbia Pictures, Photofest

During the last week of the semester, I held my senior seminar outdoors. The weather was too glorious and the students too excited. Most of them graduate this year; settling themselves on the grass, they chatted less about what we were doing today than what they would do tomorrow. Bouncing back and forth their plans for the next chapter, the next phase, the next stop in their still-young lives, they were rushing toward the future and fastened on their life after university.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

During the last week of the semester, I held my senior seminar outdoors. The weather was too glorious and the students too excited. Most of them graduate this year; settling themselves on the grass, they chatted less about what we were doing today than what they would do tomorrow. Bouncing back and forth their plans for the next chapter, the next phase, the next stop in their still-young lives, they were rushing toward the future and fastened on their life after university.

As I pretended to look over my notes, I instead listened to my students: I could not keep a tally of how many “afters” and “nexts” they were looking forward to! College was a passage in their lives, not a terminus. And yet, in professional terms, college was my endpoint. Of course, I could always quit my position and become, say, a beekeeper or busker. But let’s be honest: There are no “nexts” or “afters” left in my quiver. I launched all of them a long time ago, mostly with the aim of achieving a particular bull’s-eye: becoming a tenured professor.

And hit the bull’s-eye I did: Many years ago I became a professor — and a professor I will remain. It is, we know, one of the best of all possible professional worlds. As with Leibniz’s best of all possible worlds, however, it has its drawbacks. One of these disadvantages, I now realize, is Commencement Day. A glorious day for our students, but for us — not so much.

Don’t get me wrong. We are, of course, often thanked by our students and their parents, and ritually recognized by administrators and their guest speakers. But the speakers always aim their advice and encouragement at the students, not their teachers. And why wouldn’t they? The lives of our students are linear, heading onward and upward in a direction that has yet to be defined. Like Buzz Lightyear, they are being launched into infinity and beyond: They need all the attention, advice, and applause we can give them.

Our lives, on the other hand, seem cyclical. We mostly recycle the same syllabi, mostly remain in our chosen specializations or subspecializations, and mostly review books and articles we vaguely feel we have already reviewed. Sure, we have every intention of teaching that new class we meant to propose, to add to a syllabus those new books we meant to read, and to begin research for that article we meant to write. Then, suddenly, it’s fall. And there we are, standing in the front of the classroom, looking out at our new students who — some prim, others pierced; some focused, others flat-lining — somehow resemble our old students, while discussing a syllabus that somehow resembles our old syllabus.

Commencement Day? Honestly, the event, and all that follows, feels more like Recommencement Day. Am I alone in thinking that we resemble, if just a smidgen, Phil Connors, the character played by Bill Murray in the movie Groundhog Day? Like him, our credo might well be: “Well, what if there is no tomorrow? There wasn’t one today.”

I know, I know: How dare I suggest we are all captives of a professional Punxsutawney, forever reliving February 2 in our groves of academe! Haven’t we, after all, just received a “revise & resubmit” from the leading journal in our field? Weren’t we, just the other day, asked to chair a panel at our professional society’s annual conference? Aren’t we about to set our guild on its collective ear with our transformational monograph? Or, at least, gain tenure in that same guild?

Perhaps this is working out for you. But as Phil Connors, who learns French during his long sojourn in New Hampshire, would say: je persiste et signe. I insist there is something Punxsutawneyish at least to my professorial life. This is why, just as students receive sage counsel on Commencement Day, so too should faculty members get equally wise advice on what, for all intents and purposes, is our Recommencement Day. While today is the first day of the rest of their lives, today is the first day of what have always already been our lives.

Clearly, the normal run of actors and activists, business and political leaders won’t do for us. Crusty and crafty veterans of the practical world, they no doubt have much to tell our students. As for us, we need someone with a more metaphysical turn of mind. Wanted: a few good thinkers who have wrestled with this fundamentally absurd datum of our lives, who have dwelt on this peculiar wrinkle to human existence — a wrinkle our students are too young to wear.

In a word, is there an existentialist in the house?

ADVERTISEMENT

Friedrich Nietzsche immediately comes to mind. He’s dead, you say? Well, according to his theory of eternal recurrence, Nietzsche says he’s not. Thanks to eternity, all previous configurations in the cosmos will inevitably play out again and again, without end. This is, it seems, bad physics, but Nietzsche doesn’t care. It’s good philosophy — philosophy done with a hammer. Not only have we all of eternity to learn French, but we have all of eternity to relearn French: an eternity that dwarfs what felt like an eternity during our undergrad days in the language lab.

Put another way, few things concentrate the mind more than eternal recurrence. What if a demon, Nietzsche wonders, were to whisper in our ears: “This life as you now live it and have lived it, you will have to live once more and innumerable times more. … The eternal hourglass of existence is turned over again and again — and you with it, speck of dust!” Would we gnash our teeth, Nietzsche asks, or would we shout: “Never did I hear anything more divine!”

Teeth-gnashing comes easily to academics; I ground down my own ages ago. But what if we instead embraced the notion of eternal recurrence? Practiced what Nietzsche called amor fati — wanting nothing to be different in our lives were we condemned to repeat them through all of time? Albert Camus posed this very question in his story of Sisyphus. Condemned by the gods to push a boulder up a hillside, watch it roll down, then push it back up through all of eternity, Sisyphus makes this fate his own. This struggle, Camus tells us, is enough to fill a man or woman’s heart. Just as “one must imagine Sisyphus happy,” come Recommencement Day, we must imagine each of our selves happy, too.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Opinion
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Robert Zaretsky
Robert Zaretsky teaches in the Honors College and the department of modern and classical languages at the University of Houston. His latest book is Victories Never Last: Reading and Caregiving in a Time of Plague.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Protesters gather outside the Department of Education headquarters in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 14, 2025 to protest the Trump administrations cuts at the agency.
An Uncertain Future
The Education Dept. Got a Green Light to Shrink. Here Are 3 Questions About What’s Next.
Susie West and Dianne Davis-Keening, U of M Extension SuperShelf coordinators.
A 'Connector' Severed
Congress Cut a Federal Nutrition Program, Jeopardizing Campus Jobs and Community Services
PPP 10 FINAL promo.jpg
Bouncing Back?
For Once, Public Confidence in Higher Ed Has Increased
University of California, Berkeley chancellor Dr. Rich Lyons, testifies at a Congressional hearing on antisemitism, in Washington, D.C., U.S., on July 15, 2025. It is the latest in a series of House hearings on antisemitism at the university level, one that critics claim is a convenient way for Republicans to punish universities they consider too liberal or progressive, thereby undermining responses to hate speech and hate crimes. (Photo by Allison Bailey/NurPhoto via AP)
Another Congressional Hearing
3 College Presidents Went to Congress. Here’s What They Talked About.

From The Review

Photo-based illustration with repeated images of a student walking, in the pattern of a graph trending down, then up.
The Review | Opinion
7 Ways Community Colleges Can Boost Enrollment
By Bob Levey
Illustration of an ocean tide shaped like Donald Trump about to wash away sandcastles shaped like a college campus.
The Review | Essay
Why Universities Are So Powerless in Their Fight Against Trump
By Jason Owen-Smith
Photo-based illustration of a closeup of a pencil meshed with a circuit bosrd
The Review | Essay
How Are Students Really Using AI?
By Derek O'Connell

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin