> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
News
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

One Trustee’s View From the Trenches

By  Anthony P. Lubrano
March 9, 2015
Anthony P. Lubrano
Abby Drey, AP Images
Anthony P. Lubrano

To understand the challenges facing trustees today, look no further than Pennsylvania State University.

The Penn State board is a complex mix of elected, somewhat elected, and appointed trustees who oversee 24 campuses—including a law school and a medical school—throughout the state. Its 32 members, two of whom (the governor and the university’s president) serve ex officio and cannot vote, come to the board in different ways, making accountability tenuous at best.

Board membership breaks down as follows: nine trustees are elected by the alumni; six are elected by registered societies representing agriculture; six represent business and industry, and are nominated by a committee of five board members; six are appointed by the governor; and three are ex officio members who serve in the governor’s cabinet as the secretaries of agriculture, education, and conservation and natural resources. The board’s composition and oversight role will become even more complex in July, when it will add six more voting members.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

Anthony P. Lubrano
Abby Drey, AP Images
Anthony P. Lubrano

To understand the challenges facing trustees today, look no further than Pennsylvania State University.

The Penn State board is a complex mix of elected, somewhat elected, and appointed trustees who oversee 24 campuses—including a law school and a medical school—throughout the state. Its 32 members, two of whom (the governor and the university’s president) serve ex officio and cannot vote, come to the board in different ways, making accountability tenuous at best.

Board membership breaks down as follows: nine trustees are elected by the alumni; six are elected by registered societies representing agriculture; six represent business and industry, and are nominated by a committee of five board members; six are appointed by the governor; and three are ex officio members who serve in the governor’s cabinet as the secretaries of agriculture, education, and conservation and natural resources. The board’s composition and oversight role will become even more complex in July, when it will add six more voting members.

Having been elected by the alumni, I began my service in July 2012, during what some describe as the most unsettling time in the university’s history. At my first board meeting, I watched Louis J. Freeh, a former FBI director who led a trustee-commissioned investigation into the Jerry Sandusky child sexual-abuse case, unceremoniously berate Penn State for what he said was its football-dominated culture. I listened to the board leadership accept accountability for Freeh’s findings, all without the benefit of a review by the entire board.

Since then I have been a vocal critic of the university’s response to the report, and I have argued that the board has never verified, let alone debated, those findings. As I would learn, the culture problem actually resided within Penn State’s Board of Trustees: The trustees “elected” to represent business and industry had a stranglehold on the board’s leadership. Five of the six also served on the 13-member Trustee Presidential Selection Council, formed to choose a new president—arguably the most important responsibility of a trustee. The only alumni-elected trustee on the Selection Council (even though nine such trustees sit on the board) would eventually not seek re-election. After the council failed in its first attempt at hiring a president, and after I publicly protested, an additional alumni-elected trustee was named to the council.

ADVERTISEMENT

Given the reputational damage to Penn State caused by the Freeh report, I believe we have a fiduciary duty to verify the information on which the report is based. Consequently, along with two other trustees, I have formally requested access to all the files associated with the Freeh report. Sadly, litigation is a distinct possibility if we are unable to secure unfettered access to those documents.

Serving as a university trustee requires commitment, engagement, and time. It also requires a willingness to challenge the status quo. A trustee must be unafraid to question information he or she receives, and has a responsibility to verify it. Trustees need to engage with their board colleagues as well as with faculty and staff members. By doing so, a trustee minimizes the risk that he or she is uninformed.

Finally, a trustee should strive to work cooperatively with fellow trustees. Without trust and teamwork, divisions are inevitable. At Penn State, we have learned this firsthand.

Related: Board Battles

Related: Taming the Toxic Trustee

View: The Full Trends Report

Chronicle subscribers get access to the full Trends Report. Not yet a subscriber? Sign up here.

Read other items in this The Trends Report: 10 Key Shifts in Higher Education package.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin