> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
News
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

One University Takes Multiple Paths to Improve Teaching

By  Dan Berrett
March 9, 2015

When the leaders of the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor envision the world their graduates will inherit, they see a future brimming with political, social, and environmental volatility. If students are going to succeed, they will need to be nimble—able to handle complexity and to reinvent themselves, says James P. Holloway, vice provost for global and engaged education.

The institution puts money behind its aspirations. In preparing for its bicentennial, in 2017, it has started a splashy campaign called the Third Century Initiative, using $50-million from its budget. Half of the money pays for multidisciplinary efforts to solve complex societal problems. The other half supports an ambitious competitive grant program to improve undergraduate teaching.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

When the leaders of the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor envision the world their graduates will inherit, they see a future brimming with political, social, and environmental volatility. If students are going to succeed, they will need to be nimble—able to handle complexity and to reinvent themselves, says James P. Holloway, vice provost for global and engaged education.

The institution puts money behind its aspirations. In preparing for its bicentennial, in 2017, it has started a splashy campaign called the Third Century Initiative, using $50-million from its budget. Half of the money pays for multidisciplinary efforts to solve complex societal problems. The other half supports an ambitious competitive grant program to improve undergraduate teaching.

One type of award, of up to $50,000, is intended to encourage faculty members to embrace risk and experiment with new ideas in the classroom. Some of the grants have helped professors use visualization technology to teach civil-engineering students how to react to surprising events on construction projects. Others have supported students working on entrepreneurial projects in the creative arts.

The other type of award, for up to $3-million, encourages professors to adopt teaching experiments more widely. A team of professors from seven colleges, for example, will use a $3-million grant to recast the training of about 4,000 health-sciences students. They will learn how to work in cross-disciplinary teams, a system favored by many health professionals. About $9.5-million in grants has been awarded in total.

But money has only been part of the story, Mr. Holloway says. “What these programs do, fundamentally, is create attention,” he says. “There’s a message of legitimacy.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Professors hear that it’s OK for them to try new teaching approaches. And encouraging them to vie for grants gets their competitive juices flowing.

More important yet, he says, are the conversations that are sparked. “Even when the program is gone, you created the capacity to share these ideas. The real impact is the residue of knowledge.”

Experts at other universities have marveled at the size of Michigan’s commitment. But a grant as small as $3,000 can send a powerful signal to faculty members and allow them to pay a graduate assistant to flesh out new approaches.

Scholarship is often a professor’s top priority, especially at a research-intensive university like Michigan. In 2012 it augmented its tenure-and-promotion policies to encourage committees to give “full recognition” to candidates who had created new instructional methods.

Bread-and-butter resources like Michigan’s Center for Research on Learning and Teaching are also a part of its bid to improve teaching. Grants, coaching, and conversations all help get the attention of busy faculty members. “You need a lot of different strategies,” says Matthew L. Kaplan, the center’s interim director.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We always say faculty time is the scarcest resource.”

Related: Teaching Revival

View: The Full Trends Report

Chronicle subscribers get access to the full Trends Report. Not yet a subscriber? Sign up here.

Read other items in this The Trends Report: 10 Key Shifts in Higher Education package.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Dan Berrett
Dan Berrett is a senior editor for The Chronicle of Higher Education. He joined The Chronicle in 2011 as a reporter covering teaching and learning. Follow him on Twitter @danberrett, or write to him at dan.berrett@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin