Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
News

Only 1 Percent of Students Would Consider Disrupting Speakers Violently, Survey Finds

By Julia Martinez October 11, 2017
Protesters gather outside a speech by Ben Shapiro, a conservative commentator, at the U. of California at Berkeley in September. The results of a new survey suggest that very few students would consider resorting to violence to stop a controversial speaker.
Protesters gather outside a speech by Ben Shapiro, a conservative commentator, at the U. of California at Berkeley in September. The results of a new survey suggest that very few students would consider resorting to violence to stop a controversial speaker.Josh Edelson/AP Images

It can be difficult to cut through the noise on campus free speech, an issue that arouses strong — and sometimes poorly informed — opinions both inside and outside higher ed.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Protesters gather outside a speech by Ben Shapiro, a conservative commentator, at the U. of California at Berkeley in September. The results of a new survey suggest that very few students would consider resorting to violence to stop a controversial speaker.
Protesters gather outside a speech by Ben Shapiro, a conservative commentator, at the U. of California at Berkeley in September. The results of a new survey suggest that very few students would consider resorting to violence to stop a controversial speaker.Josh Edelson/AP Images

It can be difficult to cut through the noise on campus free speech, an issue that arouses strong — and sometimes poorly informed — opinions both inside and outside higher ed.

The issue is so charged that even survey data can be shrouded in controversy. After several news outlets reported last month on a Brookings Institution survey that found a significant percentage of students agreed that violence could be used to combat hateful speech, several scholars contended the survey’s methodology was poor. One even called it “junk science.”

The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, or FIRE, an organization that advocates for free speech in higher ed, on Wednesday released its latest report on free-speech attitudes on campuses. The results draw on responses last summer from 1,250 undergraduates attending two- or four-year colleges in the United States.

Here are three interesting findings:

1. Only 1 percent of students would consider disrupting a guest speaker with violent action.

This finding contradicts the Brookings study, which found that nearly 20 percent of college students said it would be acceptable for groups to engage in violence to stop a controversial speaker. The results of that study, conducted by an electrical-engineering professor, have been criticized over an ambiguous methodology section and the fact that it didn’t randomly sample students, among other things.

According to the FIRE study, if a speaker has a history of racist or hateful comments, then 69 percent of students who already support disinvitations agree that the speaker’s invitation should be withdrawn.

But students are not prone to simply avoid speakers they don’t agree with. Forty-two percent of respondents to the survey said they might attend a speech by a speaker with whom they strongly disagree. Others said they might boycott (16 percent) or attend a protest (11 percent); similar proportions said they would write a letter to the campus newspaper (13 percent) or post on social media (15 percent).

Less than 5 percent said they would consider taking down fliers, preventing other students from attending, heckling the speaker (although a third said they would pipe up during the speaker’s Q&A session), or resorting to violent tactics.

ADVERTISEMENT

Anti-Americans, abortion providers, and racists would be the first speakers disinvited by Republican students responding to the survey. Democratic students would disinvite racists, sexists, and homophobes, and 43 percent said they’d disinvite President Trump, although those respondents were more likely to support disinvitations over all (66 percent) than were their Republican counterparts (47 percent).

2. Students all along the ideological spectrum have their own concerns with free expression on campus.

Very liberal students are more likely to push to disinvite a speaker, while Republican students believe they should not have to walk past student protests.

Only 38 percent of very conservative students support canceling a speaking event in some instances, compared with 78 percent of very liberal students.

ADVERTISEMENT

If a college or university cannot provide adequate security for a speaker, a little less than half of students believe the event should be canceled, while 20 percent believe the speaker should not be invited if protests are planned.

Republicans and very conservative students take issue with protests: A little less than two-thirds of very conservative students and 60 percent of Republicans believe they should not have to walk through a campus protest. Only 17 percent of very liberal students, and 28 percent of Democrats, agree.

3. Most students are comfortable expressing themselves, but the degree varies.

Very liberal students seem more comfortable sharing opinions in the classroom than do very conservative students, with a difference of 14 percentage points. Once out of the classroom and on the campus, the gap widens to 21 percentage points.

ADVERTISEMENT

Most students feel comfortable sharing their ideas and opinions in the classroom, but that comfort shifts if the student is African-American or Latino, with more than 90 percent in both groups feeling comfortable enough to share. But only 85 percent of white students are comfortable sharing their thoughts.

As students spend more time in college, their willingness to censor themselves increases a little.

As students spend more time in college, their willingness to censor themselves increases a little. Less than half of freshmen reported having self-censored on their campus, while more than half of seniors had done the same. Around half of students who had self-censored said they’d wanted to avoid their classmates’ judgment, and a third thought they’d offend their peers with their word choice.

Ninety-two percent of survey respondents said being exposed to other students’ ideas and opinions is important to a college education. If students strongly disagree with their peers in the classroom, they’re almost three times as likely to attempt to understand another student’s point of view if it’s not a racist or hurtful statement. Half of respondents said they might avoid a classmate who had made statements considered racist.

A version of this article appeared in the October 27, 2017, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Free Speech
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

What Berkeley’s $800,000 Did — and Didn’t — Buy During ‘Free Speech Week’
After a Speaker Is Shouted Down, William & Mary Becomes New Flash Point in Free-Speech Fight
The Trump Administration Says Colleges Are Suppressing Free Speech. How Should They Respond?
Sessions’ Justice Dept. Will Weigh In on Free-Speech Cases. What Should Campuses Expect?
Civil Debate Is Fine. Protest Is Even Better.

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin