Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Hands-On Career Preparation
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    Alternative Pathways
Sign In
Advice

Our Slimmed-Down Pandemic Pedagogy

As instructors, many of us are covering less content this academic year. Maybe that’s a good thing for students.

By David Gooblar March 24, 2021
Gooblar-March24-GettyImages-1217036777
Getty Images

Earlier this year, Tressie McMillan Cottom — an associate professor at the University of North Carolina, a MacArthur “genius” award winner, and, by all accounts, an amazing teacher — let it be known on Twitter that she had had enough:

Here’s the thing. I don’t want to do this anymore. I don’t want to reverse engineer an abbreviated, accelerated, online class for exhausted students. I don’t want to beta test online modules. I don’t want to do any of it.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Earlier this year, Tressie McMillan Cottom — an associate professor at the University of North Carolina, a MacArthur “genius” award winner, and, by all accounts, an amazing teacher — let it be known on Twitter that she had had enough:

Here’s the thing. I don’t want to do this anymore. I don’t want to reverse engineer an abbreviated, accelerated, online class for exhausted students. I don’t want to beta test online modules. I don’t want to do any of it.

It’s safe to say that a sense of weariness has permeated the spring semester for faculty members across the country. We want our classrooms, our campuses, and our old teaching lives back, and we know our students do, too.

If there’s one thing I learned from online teaching in the fall, it’s that we need to lower our expectations for what we can achieve in unprecedented times. I know I’m not alone in discovering that teaching online — during a pandemic, amid national political turmoil, with children underfoot facing their own online learning challenges — is significantly more taxing than teaching in a “normal” semester.

And of course we know that if we’re more exhausted, our students must be, too. At my large public research university, a significant portion of my students are taking 18 credits — the maximum allowed — while also working 20 to 30 hours a week. Some take care of siblings or parents. Some are struggling with housing or food insecurity. Even the most comfortable of my students are tired. They’re socially isolated, anxious and depressed, often grieving (for a loved one or for their old life), and unable to focus for as long as they used to. Just like us.

Out of this combination of necessity (I am at my limit) and understanding (so are my students), I’ve shifted my approach to my courses significantly. Mostly I’ve changed my assumptions about the amount of time and energy all of us are able to muster. I assign less reading. I’m more flexible with how, and when, students do their work. And I’m devoting even more time in class to letting students share what they’re going through, with me and with their peers.

All of which means my courses this academic year are covering a lot less material than they normally would. I bet yours are, too. Given these less-than-ideal circumstances, you may be worried about shortchanging your students.

However, this shift in our teaching — if approached in the right way — won’t negatively affect students too much. What makes a great course is not the amount of material that we are able to pour into students’ heads. By far, the most efficient way to cover the most material is to lecture. But efficiency is not the goal. And just because we cover the material does not mean students understand it. Indeed, copious research tells us that courses that rely on active-learning strategies benefit students much more than lecture-heavy classes.

No, what our students need — all of the time really but especially during a pandemic — is quality, not quantity.

ADVERTISEMENT

I would much rather my students read one chapter closely, so that they’re able to understand its central concepts and discuss them in class, than skim three chapters and barely remember what they read. I’d rather they put their energies into completing a two-page assignment that engages their abilities in a manageable amount of time than struggle to finish a 10-page paper that brings them more anxiety than knowledge. I’d rather grade those short assignments, too.

I’ve also become convinced, in our Zoom era, that using class time to cultivate a supportive environment is more important than ever. Students, just like us, are craving social interaction and human contact, both which are necessary for mental and physical health. They miss chatting with friends and acquaintances before and after class. (Did you ever think you’d miss small talk in the hallway with your colleagues?) So I leave more time in class for conversation and community-building activities — even if that means we have less time for content.

One way I’ve found helpful to conceptualize this new, slimmed-down teaching approach is to think of what we’re doing in the classroom as aiming to develop values or virtues. In the recently published collection Ungrading: Why Rating Students Undermines Learning (and What to Do Instead), John Warner has an essay on his efforts to move away from traditional grading in his writing courses. His early attempts replaced traditional grading with a “proficiency scale,” he writes. But eventually he realized that he didn’t want to aim for proficiency at all.

Warner makes a distinction in his writing courses between values and skills. “In writing I value attitudes like curiosity, thoroughness, and fairness, none of which directly deal with skills associated with proficiency,” he argues. ‘Yet if those values are attended to ..., my belief is those skills will develop far beyond what is possible when aiming for mere proficiency, or its close cousin, competency.” In short, teaching those attitudes and values to students will make them better writers than if the focus was purely on skills.

ADVERTISEMENT

This approach seems particularly attractive in a semester in which we won’t get to as much material as we would like. Warner’s argument isn’t so far off from Jason Baehr’s concept of “intellectual virtues,” an idea I wrote about in a 2017 essay for The Chronicle, “Yes, We Should Teach Character.” Intellectual virtues — which Baehr defines as “the deep personal qualities or character traits of a good thinker or learner” — can be a new way to think of our courses, instead of just as a set amount of content or a collection of skills. To teach intellectual virtues is to teach habits of mind or ways of being that go beyond the precise material you get to during the semester.

This semester, I’ve been focused on promoting the intellectual curiosity that will lead my students to seek out valuable additional reading later in life, after I’m no longer assigning them homework. By carefully paring down the amount of material we read and discuss in class, it’s my hope that the content we do cover will be covered more deeply and will be more likely to leave a lasting impact. Part of teaching students the value of intellectual curiosity is showing them that careful attention to a single article, say, can yield outsized intellectual rewards.

As students and faculty members alike muster up the strength to get through the rest of this long academic year, it’s important to acknowledge how exhausted we all are. I’m weary, and I know you are, too. I’m not at my best, not by a long shot. But I’m still committed to helping my students learn and develop, and I think I can, even within such straitened circumstances.

My short-term goal for this semester is to survive this semester. There will come a day when this pandemic is behind us, when some semblance of normalcy will return, when we’ll be able to be the teachers and the students we want to be. My larger goal now is to help my students be in a position to hit the ground running when that day comes.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Teaching & Learning Online Learning
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
David Gooblar
David Gooblar is an assistant professor of English and of gender, women’s, and sexuality studies at the University of Iowa. He was previously associate director of Temple University’s Center for the Advancement of Teaching. His most recent book, The Missing Course: Everything They Never Taught You About College Teaching, was published by Harvard University Press in 2019. To find more advice on teaching, browse his previous columns here.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Graphic vector illustration of a ship with education-like embellishments being tossed on a black sea with a Kraken-esque elephant trunk ascending from the depth against a stormy red background.
Creeping concerns
Most Colleges Aren’t a Target of Trump (Yet). Here’s How Their Presidents Are Leading.
Photo-based illustration of calendars on a wall (July, August and September) with a red line marking through most of the dates
'A Creative Solution'
Facing Federal Uncertainty, Swarthmore Makes a Novel Plan: the 3-Month Budget
Marva Johnson is set to take the helm of Florida A&M University this summer.
Leadership & governance
‘Surprising': A DeSantis-Backed Lobbyist Is Tapped to Lead Florida A&M
Students and community members protest outside of Coffman Memorial Union at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis, on Tuesday, April 23, 2024.
Campus Activism
One Year After the Encampments, Campuses Are Quieter and Quicker to Stop Protests

From The Review

Glenn Loury in Providence, R.I. on May 7, 2024.
The Review | Conversation
Glenn Loury on the ‘Barbarians at the Gates’
By Evan Goldstein, Len Gutkin
Illustration showing a valedictorian speaker who's tassel is a vintage microphone
The Review | Opinion
A Graduation Speaker Gets Canceled
By Corey Robin
Illustration showing a stack of coins and a university building falling over
The Review | Opinion
Here’s What Congress’s Endowment-Tax Plan Might Cost Your College
By Phillip Levine

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin