Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
Sign In
Athletics

Payments for Athletes? Check. Players With Balanced Lives? Not So Much.

By Brad Wolverton December 11, 2014
New York

Big-time athletic departments have budgeted millions of dollars for athletes in the coming years, including new payments to help cover their full cost of attending college. Recent court rulings have eased the way for additional contributions.

This week, as the heavyweights of college sports gathered for a summit on intercollegiate athletics, campus leaders discussed the possibility of sharing even more money with athletes, including through group licensing deals for the use of players’ images and likenesses.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Big-time athletic departments have budgeted millions of dollars for athletes in the coming years, including new payments to help cover their full cost of attending college. Recent court rulings have eased the way for additional contributions.

This week, as the heavyweights of college sports gathered for a summit on intercollegiate athletics, campus leaders discussed the possibility of sharing even more money with athletes, including through group licensing deals for the use of players’ images and likenesses.

But worries over those payments have many people concerned about a contraction of sports at the highest levels of the National Collegiate Athletic Association. And some top officials say that the focus on money has left colleges struggling to help players—many of whom spend more than 40 hours a week on their sport—attain more balance in their lives.

Several leaders who spoke here this week at the IMG Intercollegiate Athletics Forum, an annual event organized by the SportsBusiness Journal, urged colleges to pay less attention to how they spend their money and more time ensuring that players receive an adequate education.

“The dialogue ought to be about education, about opportunities, about fairness—less about ROI and year-over-year and all that,” Jim Delany, commissioner of the Big Ten Conference, said during a panel discussion on Wednesday.

In an interview with The Chronicle, he said colleges must focus on helping athletes pursue opportunities outside of athletics.

“It’s hard for me to conceive of the college experience in the 21st century that doesn’t have some elements of internships, that doesn’t have study abroad—some time away from sports,” he said.

During the playing season, NCAA rules stipulate that athletes may spend only four hours a day, or up to 20 hours a week, on organized sports activities. But Mr. Delany said that rule is often abused.

“The 20-hour rule is a misnomer. It doesn’t matter whether it’s in Division III or Division I, the amount of time that people are spending on sports is not 20 hours,” he said. “In fact, whatever’s going on in Division III is closer to what’s going on in Division I than it is to 20 hours.”

‘People Are Bewildered’

During a panel discussion on Wednesday, Taylor Kelly, a quarterback at Arizona State University, described participating in football activities from 5:30 a.m. until 11 or 12, then studying plays on his own at night. On Thursday, Mark Lewis, a senior NCAA official, said that some professional football and basketball players reported spending less time on their sport than they did in college.

ADVERTISEMENT

Mr. Delany said he had made little progress in persuading his fellow athletics leaders to better regulate the athletics commitments of students.

“There are a lot of different sports, so it’s going to take some study,” he said. He would like to see athletics officials spend the next year discussing different ways to make that happen.

As the NCAA faces increasing threats to its amateurism model, Mr. Delany said, colleges have real incentives to ensure that athletes are students first, with lives outside of their sports.

This week, a half-dozen leaders here expressed some variation on that message.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Our current model only works if we are committed to the education of athletes,” said Nathan O. Hatch, president of Wake Forest University and chair of the NCAA’s Division I Board of Directors.

During a panel on Wednesday, he and the Rev. Peter M. Donohue, president of Villanova University, discussed their worries about legal cases that could force colleges to make large new payments to players.

Last summer a federal judge ruled that big-time college football and basketball players could receive up to $5,000 per year in deferred compensation for the use of their names, images, and likenesses. The NCAA has appealed the ruling, which is set to go into effect in August 2015.

Such payments would not just affect football and basketball players, Mr. Hatch said. He believes that, if colleges choose to set aside money for athletes in those two sports, they will probably do so for all athletes.

ADVERTISEMENT

Other legal threats, including a lawsuit challenging the NCAA’s scholarship limits, could lead to even greater payouts for players. The lawsuits have caused consternation among many leaders, Mr. Hatch said.

“In some ways, people are bewildered,” he said. “There’s no clear end if decisions like that go into effect.”

Mr. Hatch and several other leaders here said they worried that the proposed new benefits for players would lead to cutbacks in sports. “I don’t think there’s any other way to think about it,” Mr. Hatch said.

Appropriate Benefits

Institutions would be better served by thinking more expansively about the most appropriate benefits for players, said Jack Swarbrick, vice president and athletic director at the University of Notre Dame.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The problem now is that we’re allowing the debate to be defined for us as an economic one and not a mission-driven one,” he said in an interview on Wednesday. “To me the issue isn’t what additional benefits can be provided. The issue is, what benefits are appropriate?”

If colleges just focused on treating athletes like other students, Mr. Swarbrick said, the institutions could solve many of their problems in sports.

“This whole separation of the student-athlete from the student body, I think, is at the core of our problem,” he said. For example, he said, he wonders why college athletes face limits on the money they can earn from certain outside sources when other students don’t face such limits.

“You’ve got to ask yourself,” he said, “OK, why can the music student go downtown and play on Friday night and make whatever he wants, and that athlete is limited in that regard?”

ADVERTISEMENT

For that matter, he said, there’s no reason why college athletes should not be able to receive a share of group licensing revenue from the commercial use of their images.

“Professional unions have been figuring this out for years—it’s not high math,” he said. The market could help determine the appropriate revenue for players.

“What will you buy if this jersey’s just a generic ‘14’ for the year?” Mr. Swarbrick said, referring to the market. “What’s it worth with a player’s number—or with his name on the back?”

Mr. Swarbrick said he wasn’t sure how many other leaders agreed with his position, which he said was constantly evolving.

ADVERTISEMENT

He said he and his colleagues must begin thinking differently about how they solve problems.

“The only thing I think we can all agree on right now,” he said, “is that conventional thinking in this area is not going to get us where we need to be.”

Brad Wolverton is a senior writer who covers college sports. Follow him on Twitter @bradwolverton.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Athletics
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Brad Wolverton
About the Author
Brad Wolverton
Former senior writer Brad Wolverton covered college athletics at The Chronicle beginning in 2005, focusing on the confluence of money and sports on campus. His research highlighted allegations of academic misconduct, reports of coaches’ meddling in medical decisions, and concerns about a rapid rise in athletics donations.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Illustration of a magnifying glass highlighting the phrase "including the requirements set forth in Presidential Executive Order 14168 titled Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government."
Policy 'Whiplash'
Research Grants Increasingly Require Compliance With Trump’s Orders. Here’s How Colleges Are Responding.
Photo illustration showing internal email text snippets over a photo of a University of Iowa campus quad
Red-state reticence
Facing Research Cuts, Officials at U. of Iowa Spoke of a ‘Limited Ability to Publicly Fight This’
Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues

From The Review

Football game between UCLA and Colorado University, at Folsom Field in Boulder, Colo., Sept. 24, 2022.
The Review | Opinion
My University Values Football More Than Education
By Sigman Byrd
Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin