> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
Enrollment
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Poaching Enrolled Students: Once Taboo, Now OK

By  Eric Hoover
February 4, 2020
Many enrollment leaders are considering offering transfer incentives to students enrolled at other colleges, according to a new report.
Bryce Richter, U. of Wisconsin at Madison, via Wikimedia Commons
Many enrollment leaders are considering offering transfer incentives to students enrolled at other colleges, according to a new report.

If you’re already feeling jittery about enrollment trends, please put down that coffee before reading any further. The rules of competition are changing.

Case in point: Thirty-five percent of enrollment leaders said they were considering trying to poach other colleges’ students, according to a recent survey by EAB, a consulting firm in Washington, D.C. How? By sending transfer incentives to students whom they previously admitted but who ended up attending other four-year colleges. Additionally, 11 percent of respondents said they were considering going after students enrolled elsewhere, whether or not they had applied or been admitted in the first place.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

If you’re already feeling jittery about enrollment trends, please put down that coffee before reading any further. The rules of competition are changing.

Case in point: Thirty-five percent of enrollment leaders said they were considering trying to poach other colleges’ students, according to a recent survey by EAB, a consulting firm in Washington, D.C. How? By sending transfer incentives to students whom they previously admitted but who ended up attending other four-year colleges. Additionally, 11 percent of respondents said they were considering going after students enrolled elsewhere, whether or not they had applied or been admitted in the first place.

Those findings are from a new report, “Enrollment Strategy After the NACAC Vote,” which EAB released on Wednesday. The document offers an early glimpse of how colleges are responding to recent changes in the National Association for College Admission Counseling’s ethics code.

Last fall, under pressure from the U.S. Justice Department, the association, known as NACAC, removed three provisions from its guidelines. One of those provisions barred recruitment of students attending other institutions, as well as solicitation of transfer applications from a previous year’s applicant or member of a prospect pool. Now a once-taboo practice could become a matter of course.

“The gloves are off,” Madeleine Rhyneer, vice president for consulting services and dean of enrollment management at EAB, said in a recent interview. “Now there are more levers to pull. You may not love them; you may not want to use them. But there are a lot more of them to think about.”

ADVERTISEMENT

NACAC also removed a provision that barred colleges from knowingly recruiting applicants who have committed to or submitted an enrollment deposit to another institution. Nearly a quarter (23 percent) of the survey’s 150-plus respondents said they were considering going after such students.

But, so far, chasing potential transfer students seems like the more-appealing strategy, EAB found. One likely reason: The transfer market is huge and ever churning. According to EAB’s analysis of data from the National Student Clearinghouse, 19 percent of students who first enroll at a four-year college later transfer to another four-year college.

At any moment, tuition-payers everywhere are thinking about ditching their college, for any number of possible reasons. A recent EAB survey of 2,000 freshmen found that fewer than half (48 percent) “definitely” would choose the same college again, with 31 percent saying they “probably” would, 9 percent saying “probably not,” and 5 percent saying “definitely not.” The rest weren’t sure.

The same survey asked freshmen about incentives that would make them consider applying to a college they previously had considered. Cost reduction was the big one: Thirty-four percent of students would consider transferring to another four-year college offering a scholarship that lowered their current cost of attendance. Twenty-eight percent would consider another college that offered to transfer all credits from their current institution. And 18 percent would consider a college that offered a spot in a program to which they previously were not admitted.

If all that sounds unsettling in this age of loosened restrictions and potential poaching, take a deep breath and think of it all as an opportunity. The changes in NACAC’s guidelines, the report says, might sharpen institutions’ focus on retention: “Given the increased risk of losing students to other schools’ transfer-recruitment efforts, it is likely that college and university leaders responsible for keeping currently enrolled students happy and engaged will find it easier to get a hearing from key stakeholders at their institutions.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Rhyneer, who was previously vice president for enrollment and marketing at Susquehanna University, in Selinsgrove, Pa., suggested that doubling down on student engagement was crucial. “The best strategies for colleges to pursue are in the best interest of the student,” she said. “You’ve got to keep the student in the center.”

After NACAC changed its ethics code, many admissions and enrollment officials said they would be reluctant to adopt any of the once-prohibited practices. But things change. “It seems safest to assume that adoption of more-aggressive recruitment tactics,” the report says, “will be rapid and widespread.”

Embracing a hypercompetitive enrollment tactic, such as poaching another college’s freshmen and sophomores, is a complex decision, Rhyneer said. A college must balance its ideals against bottom-line imperatives, which can be especially difficult at tuition-dependent colleges scrapping for every shred of revenue.

“If you do something that goes against your institutional mission, it’s hard to feel good about it,” Rhyneer said. “Stealing might not be a congruent value with your college’s ethos. So making these moves isn’t something everyone would feel good about at all. On the other hand, you don’t feel good about people on your campus not getting paid.”

A version of this article appeared in the February 14, 2020, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Admissions & Enrollment
Eric Hoover
Eric Hoover writes about the challenges of getting to, and through, college. Follow him on Twitter @erichoov, or email him, at eric.hoover@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin