Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Trump Webinar Series
    Mental Health Forum
    Using Big Data to Improve Social Mobility
Sign In
The Review

Policing the Imagination

By Madison Smartt Bell May 17, 2017
Policing the Imagination 1
Selcuk Demirel for The Chronicle Review

In the latest issue of Write, a publication of the Writers’ Union of Canada, its then-editor, Hal Niedzviecki, argued that “anyone, anywhere, should be encouraged to imagine other peoples, other cultures, other identities,” and to write about them. There was an immediate outcry from other contributors and union members. The union apologized for what Niedzviecki had published. Niedzviecki resigned as editor. News coverage made it clear that he had effectively been convicted of disbelief in the concept of “cultural appropriation,” which in the view of his accusers amounts to a form of heresy.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

In the latest issue of Write, a publication of the Writers’ Union of Canada, its then-editor, Hal Niedzviecki, argued that “anyone, anywhere, should be encouraged to imagine other peoples, other cultures, other identities,” and to write about them. There was an immediate outcry from other contributors and union members. The union apologized for what Niedzviecki had published. Niedzviecki resigned as editor. News coverage made it clear that he had effectively been convicted of disbelief in the concept of “cultural appropriation,” which in the view of his accusers amounts to a form of heresy.

The identity politics informing this scandal and other recent and similar episodes (such as the novelist Lionel Shriver’s controversial speech at the Brisbane Writers Festival last year) date back to the 1990s. Since then, an unwritten rule prohibiting a member of a particular identity group from speaking as if from within the experience of another identity group has gained power, and nowadays it is often very loudly and stringently enforced. A kind of silencing ensues from the enforcement.

In the present social and political situation, clinging to this style of identity politics strikes me as something like refusing to eject from an exploding airplane. Give me a minute to explain why.

The rule has its origin in a right and reasonable objection to travesties and caricatures afflicted upon different identity groups by poorly conceived and executed texts. Let’s agree we should give up writing characters like Tonto. We can afford to be ashamed that anyone ever wrote characters like him (or Uncle Tom, or examples of your choice). But what about Faulkner’s Dilsey? If the rule is applied to the literature of the past, it’s not only that Mark Twain can’t write about Jim. Henry James can’t write about women. Flannery O’Connor can’t write about the Misfit or Hulga’s wooden leg. All historical fiction, from War and Peace to The Clan of the Cave Bear, has to be wiped from the lexicon. Were this logic to be consistently followed, then Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie couldn’t write about white Americans or indeed about anyone outside the Nigerian communities within which her stories are set.

Writing isn’t only about self-expression. It’s about imagining the lives of others and representing them in a convincing way.

I am a white male fiction writer from the rural South. I have written some material about people who share my background, but the fact is that my own personality doesn’t interest me much as a subject, and I am far more interested in imagining the lives of others. In the first 10 years of my publishing career I was often assumed to be African-American because I often wrote from the points of view of African-American characters. This illusion was supported by the fact that my triple-barreled Southern-style name sounds a little like “George Washington Carver.” (More recently I am often assumed to be a woman, not because of anything I write, alas, but thanks to all the little girls named “Madison” after the mermaid portrayed by Daryl Hannah in the movie Splash.)

Meanwhile I was also writing from the points of view of mice and hydrocephalic dwarves, and from the points of view of women as I began to learn how to do that more convincingly. I spent 20 years writing novels about the Haitian Revolution, a late-18th-century event in which all the players were completely foreign to my personal experience, from the French colonists to the fugitive slaves in the hills above the cane fields. These books, which began to be published in the 1990s, were warmly received by Haitian artists and intellectuals (I do not claim by all of them). More recently a white scholar has attacked this work on grounds of sensationalism, cultural misappropriation, and other now-familiar academic buzzwords. I’m not complaining; the guy spells my name right; all publicity is good.

For thirty-some years I have taught fiction workshops at Goucher College, a small institution with what has become over those three decades a large creative-writing program. The same period has seen sweeping social changes, both within and outside the academy. Goucher prides itself, with some justice, on diversity. We have more students of color; more foreign students; more gay, transgender, and gender-fluid students than ever before, and we try, seriously and sincerely, to make them all comfortable. For student writers, the richness of potential subject matter is exciting.

Much has been written about the cultivation of special sensitivities in these kinds of communities, and the risks pertaining thereto (e.g. “The Coddling of the American Mind,” published in 2015 in The Atlantic by Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt, as well as “And Campus for All,” a pamphlet produced by PEN America). In a landscape hemmed in by “safe spaces” and by an unwritten (and thus unexamined) law that people can speak only from within their own identity groups, freedom of speech for student writers can be jeopardized. Last fall it appeared that in some of our workshops some students were asking instructors to ensure, a priori, that no stories capable of giving offense be turned in to their groups at all — perhaps without realizing that compliance with such demands would hamper not only their classmates’ freedom of speech and imagination but also their own. Some of my writing-faculty colleagues and I were inclined to see these developments as an existential threat to all our practice, at least potentially.

During the same period, Donald Trump was elected president of the United States.

ADVERTISEMENT

I had seen it coming a long way off; that is, even in the 1990s I had perceived that the more insistently the various identity groups broadcast their many iterations of the statement, “It’s a _______ thing, you can never possibly understand,” the more the sectors of American society considering themselves to be mainstream could argue, “Look, those people over there are incomprehensibly alien to us. They say so themselves! If their interests are not our interests, then they are a threat to us. We must protect ourselves from their incomprehensible alien purposes. We need to wall them away from us,” if not worse. On the strength of such thinking, a reactionary movement might very well come to power; in fact, it has now done so.

For the past couple of years I’ve been opening fiction workshops by running through some version of the paragraph above. I then point out that an essential goal of liberal-arts education is to broaden the views of students and improve their capacity for empathy by exposing them to kinds of people different from their kind. A great deal of that work used to be accomplished by reading imaginative literature under the umbrella of the now-rapidly dwindling English major. Now that so many students would rather write than read, it’s incumbent upon us as teaching writers to get the same job done.

Writing isn’t only about self-expression, I argue. It’s about imagining the lives of others and representing them in a convincing way. So you, students, are encouraged to think and write outside your identity group’s comfort zone. If you bring us Tonto, you can expect to be reproached for that. But if you research and learn in good faith, if you imagine in good faith, if you compose with enough artistry and conviction, you might bring us back something that enlarges our view of the world and the people in it, even as it expands your own.

To make that happen, I tell the students, requires a community of trust — but we don’t automatically have that now, when we have just convened our group for the first time. Now is when we have to start building it — right now, without delay.

ADVERTISEMENT

So far I’ve been able to get that approach to work in my classroom ... but maybe it’s not such an accomplishment to create the necessary community spirit in a group of 15 young people who already share a number of good intentions. Outside the academy, the stakes are much higher. If there was ever such a community of trust in the American national discourse, it is a shame that we have lost it, and we need to get it back. We need to abandon the fortified positions into which identity politics has forced us, and find a way to make ourselves not only heard, but understood, across the chasms that divide us.

Madison Smartt Bell is a professor of English at Goucher College and codirector of the Kratz Center for Creative Writing there. His novel All Souls’ Rising (Pantheon, 1995), the first in a trilogy about the Haitian Revolution, was a finalist for the National Book Award and the PEN/Faulkner Award.

A version of this article appeared in the June 23, 2017, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Opinion Gender
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

Writing Race in America
On ‘Maybellene’ and General Tso’s Chicken
Beyond Sombreros, Tequila, and ‘Gangster’ Parties

More News

Conti-0127
Finance
Here’s What Republicans’ Proposed College-Endowment Tax Could Look Like
Illustration of a magnifying glass highlighting the phrase "including the requirements set forth in Presidential Executive Order 14168 titled Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government."
The Fine Print
The NIH Is Requiring Grantees to Follow Trump’s Anti-Trans Executive Order
New York City police arrested dozens of Pro-Palestinian protesters on Columbia University on Wednesday evening after they took over part of a central library in New York, USA on May 7, 2025.
'A Different Playbook'
Facing New Protests and Political Pressure, Colleges Are Taking a Harder Line
President of Haverford College Wendy Raymond (L) and President of DePaul University Robert Manuel (R) testify during a hearing before the House Education and Workforce Committee at the Rayburn House Office Building on May 7, 2025 in Washington, DC.
Leadership
Under Republicans’ Scrutiny, College Presidents Apologize for Their Handling of Campus Antisemitism

From The Review

Illustration showing two men and giant books, split into two sides—one blue and one red. The two men are reaching across the center color devide to shake hands.
The Review | Opinion
Left and Right Agree: Higher Ed Needs to Change
By Michael W. Clune
University of British Columbia president and vice-chancellor Santa Ono pauses while speaking during a memorandum of understanding  signing ceremony between the Tsilhqot'in National Government and UBC, in Vancouver, British Columbia, on Dec. 8, 2021.
The Review | Opinion
Santa Ono Flees for Florida
By Silke-Maria Weineck
GarciaBudgets-0430.jpg
The Review | Opinion
A Looming Crisis for Public Colleges
By Tanya I. Garcia

Upcoming Events

Plain_USF_AIWorkForce_VF.png
New Academic Programs for an AI-Driven Work Force
Cincy_Plain.png
Hands-On Career Preparation
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin