Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
Advice

Post-Covid, the Personal Is the Professional

Having experienced a more humane approach to work, why go back to the way things were before?

By Kevin Gannon April 4, 2022
Illustration showing large hands planning and creating an appealing university campus building blueprint.
Harry Campbell for The Chronicle

For much of this academic year, the question of a “post-Covid normal” has preoccupied higher education. I hesitate to use “post” as Covid looks to become part of our regular landscape to an undetermined degree. We seem bleakly resigned to that fact in a way that would have horrified us two years ago. What is clear: Our institutions are “returning to normal” — whether or not their constituencies are ready and/or reconciled to it.

Yet the pre-Covid normal was already unsustainable for many faculty and staff members. As much as decision makers chase the idea of “normal operations,” you can’t stir things apart. There is no going “back” to anything, but rather fashioning something different, informed (one hopes, anyway) by the lessons of “pandemic pedagogy.”

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

For much of this academic year, the question of a “post-Covid normal” has preoccupied higher education. I hesitate to use “post” as Covid looks to become part of our regular landscape to an undetermined degree. We seem bleakly resigned to that fact in a way that would have horrified us two years ago. What is clear: Our institutions are “returning to normal” — whether or not their constituencies are ready and/or reconciled to it.

Yet the pre-Covid normal was already unsustainable for many faculty and staff members. As much as decision makers chase the idea of “normal operations,” you can’t stir things apart. There is no going “back” to anything, but rather fashioning something different, informed (one hopes, anyway) by the lessons of “pandemic pedagogy.”

As an educational developer and faculty member, I’m already steeped in the larger “what’s next for higher ed?” conversations: What will be the legacy of all the online and hybrid instruction that has occurred during the pandemic? How will in-person learning function, now that many of us view densely packed crowds in lecture halls and common spaces much differently? What effects will the curricular and instructional disruptions of the past two years have on new college students?

And while those are weighty questions, I’ve come to realize that any answers will have to come against the backdrop of still other questions — ones that are less classroom-centric but more urgent nonetheless:

  • What will be the effects of long Covid?
  • How do we deal with the vast equity and access gaps laid bare by the pandemic?
  • How can we balance the needs of the institution and those of its individual constituents?
  • What happens if and when we get sick? Like, really sick?
  • And how do we do all of the work that needs to be done when faculty and staff capacity seems to be at an all-time low?

Since the “great Covid pivot” of March 2020, I have advocated for flexibility, compassion, and an ethic of care. Like most faculty members, I spent much of academic 2020-21 adjusting to Hy-Flex teaching. The bandwidth it took just to manage my own classes was considerable, but I was also supporting my colleagues and my university in the Hy-Flex arena — troubleshooting classroom tech, training folks on the various digital tools, and becoming the administrator for our university’s Zoom license.

It was … a lot, and I ended the year exhausted and burned out. Then in the summer of 2021 — just when I’d hoped to be able to take a breath and recharge — my own health outlook became unexpectedly complicated, making my advocacy urgently personal as well. Not feeling well, I visited urgent care for what turned out to be a case of walking pneumonia. But I was taken aback when the first question the doctor asked me was, “So, how long have you had your heart murmur?”

I wasn’t aware that I had a heart murmur. A subsequent visit to my regular doctor confirmed it. After that came several more appointments and an echocardiogram and then another test that involved jogging on a treadmill with electrodes taped all over my torso, followed by a couple of hours in an MRI tube. Eventually I found myself in a cardiologist’s office being told I had “hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.”

It’s a congenital condition in which the walls of my heart are too thick, leading to blood circulating improperly through the organ’s various chambers. In my particular case, my left ventricle wall is enlarged, meaning blood isn’t pumping through the mitral valve as it should, and some of it is “regurgitating” backward through the valve — driving the wrong way on a one-way street, as it were. Now, after 49 years, it was happening to a significant-enough degree to both manifest physical symptoms and be audible with a stethoscope (so we at least solved the mystery of my heart murmur).

My brain struggled to balance, “Am I going to drop dead from cardiac arrest?” with, “When am I going to respond to the 150 emails that arrived today?” Here I was, reading about faculty burnout and advocating for students’ personal struggles, but I didn’t have space to reckon with the same pressures in my own life.

ADVERTISEMENT

Whether I like it or not, my life is different now as a result of my diagnosis. The choices I make now about what I eat, how I exercise, and how I manage this condition will quite literally shape the rest of my life (as well as determine how long it will be). Likewise, whether we like it or not, higher education is different now, too. How we choose to live our institutional lives at this moment and the values that guide those decisions mean everything for our collective future.

To that end, I offer two key principles that should guide our decision making — especially in the classroom — as we reckon with the lessons of the pandemic and shape our next chapter:

Principle No. 1: Flexible systems, processes, and policies are essential. Remember in March 2020, as we shifted online and decided that rigid deadlines and attendance policies maybe weren’t the hill we wanted to die on any more? Despite the occasional dire prediction, the loosening of those traditional practices did not bring about the pedagogical cataclysm that critics predicted. In fact, all of us — students and faculty and staff members alike — have benefited from an increased flexibility rooted in kindness and compassion.

So why would we go back to the way things were before, having experienced the benefits of this different, more humane approach to work, and in particular to teaching and learning?

ADVERTISEMENT

I’m not saying we should abolish deadlines, requirements, and policies altogether. But I am most definitely arguing that, if nothing else, Covid-19 showed us that:

  • No single attendance policy can effectively deal with the complex health and personal situations of every member of our campus. What would it look like, for example, if we stopped equating a particular number of absences with “successful” or “unsuccessful” learning?
  • No single deadline policy will account for the myriad ways in which students might be facing obstacles to demonstrating their learning. What would it look like if we approached assignment due dates in our courses with flexibility built in from the very start?
  • And no lockstep approach to teaching modality will adequately match the complicated ways that our classrooms intersect with personal health concerns like we’ve never fully experienced before. What would it look like if we acknowledged that, perhaps, learning will always be hybrid, no matter how we designate courses as “in person” or “online?”

We are preparing ourselves and our institutions (and, thus, our students) for a future whose contours are as yet hard to discern. We will be much better able to meet the demands of that future if we are nimble, responsive, and open-minded, rather than chained to dead ideas and outdated standardized practices.

Principle No. 2: No one is “OK.” It isn’t melodramatic doomsaying to point that out, but rather an honest acknowledgment of our new reality. The pandemic was slow-rolling violence, unfolding across both physical and psychosocial landscapes over the past two years. Many of our students, and many of us, lost loved ones to the pandemic. Many more are experiencing hardship as the physical, spiritual, and economic consequences of the pandemic continue to be felt. A lot of us are experiencing new health problems — some Covid-related, others Covid-adjacent. And others are coping with chronic health concerns that have taken on even more complexity and emotional weight during the pandemic.

ADVERTISEMENT

As seductive as the “getting back to normal” trope is, we must be careful to not erase the trauma (in its various forms) in blithe assurances that everything is just peachy now that the pandemic is “over.”

It is not an exaggeration to use the word “trauma” here, either. I do so quite intentionally. As Mays Imad has pointed out, the diagnostic definition of trauma is “an event, series of events, or set of circumstances that is experienced by an individual as physically or emotionally harmful or threatening and that has lasting adverse effects on the individual’s functioning and physical, social, emotional, or spiritual well-being.” Two years of pandemic operations have, for nearly everyone in higher education, met at least part of that criteria, as uncertainty, isolation, and loss of meaning are three of the hallmark features of traumatic experiences.

As we move into our uncertain next chapter, we must reject the temptation to erase peoples’ lived experiences in favor of a Potemkin-esque rhetoric about being “back to pre-pandemic operations.” And we can’t ignore those still recovering from various manifestations of trauma.

In the classroom, that means pedagogy aligned with trauma-informed care. In conducting our departmental, committee, and institutional business, that means understanding there will be much different workflows than was the case before and acting with the required degree of empathy and flexibility as a result.

ADVERTISEMENT

My own experience has shown me how fragile and contingent daily routines really are, and how easy it is for seemingly simple, mundane tasks to become confounding. During these difficult years, many faculty members have benefited from students granting us the same flexibility and grace as we offered to them. Let’s not abandon that mutuality after it’s paid such meaningful dividends.

All of this may seem like a tall order. Given the disruptions since March 2020, it is sorely tempting to eschew complexity and seek simple solutions that evoke the “before times.” But extending flexibility and compassion, and embodying the principles of trauma-informed practice, are not add-ons or extra labor so much as organizing principles that should suffuse everything we do. Campus leaders are fond of using words like “collaborative” and “equitable” to describe their aspirations for how we should operate. It’s more essential than ever to enact those values rather than simply mouth them as empty platitudes.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Teaching & Learning Online Learning The Workplace Student Success Health & Wellness
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Kevin Gannon
Kevin Gannon is a professor of history at Queens University of Charlotte, and director of its Center for the Advancement of Faculty Excellence. Find him on Bluesky: @TheTattooedProf.bsky.social.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin