> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
News
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Post-Election, Some Professors Feel They Must Play Mediator

By  Shannon Najmabadi
January 27, 2017

Jay Barth has been teaching a course on political parties and elections since 1994. Most election years, the energy level of the class died down after the November vote. Last year, it ratcheted up significantly, said Mr. Barth, who is a professor of politics at Hendrix College.

And the days after President Trump’s election, he said, “created special challenges” for him and others in the classroom.

Will I put off my students? How will those talks affect course evaluations? Will I stifle conversation? Professors are asking questions like those.

It’s taboo as table talk and it’s eschewed at social engagements, but talking politics is increasingly viewed as an essential way to bridge the political divide and find common ground. However, it can get messy. Attempts to reconcile partisan views can dissolve into bickering.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

Jay Barth has been teaching a course on political parties and elections since 1994. Most election years, the energy level of the class died down after the November vote. Last year, it ratcheted up significantly, said Mr. Barth, who is a professor of politics at Hendrix College.

And the days after President Trump’s election, he said, “created special challenges” for him and others in the classroom.

Will I put off my students? How will those talks affect course evaluations? Will I stifle conversation? Professors are asking questions like those.

It’s taboo as table talk and it’s eschewed at social engagements, but talking politics is increasingly viewed as an essential way to bridge the political divide and find common ground. However, it can get messy. Attempts to reconcile partisan views can dissolve into bickering.

The environment of a lecture hall can be even more fraught, as faculty members must play mediator and educator to students from a range of backgrounds. Though campus forums on politics are often held outside the classroom, some professors — like those in political science, such as Mr. Barth — can’t avoid the topic.

At the start of a new semester and a week into a new presidential administration, a few professors shared how they’re wrestling with talking politics and policy in class.

ADVERTISEMENT

‘Feelings Are Very Raw’

As a professor of political science and philosophy at Weber State University, Leah A. Murray said she feels comfortable talking about contemporary politics. “To a certain extent, I am always discussing the election,” she said.

But Ms. Murray, who is also the democratic-engagement coordinator at the Utah institution, said her experience isn’t representative of most faculty members. In her role as coordinator, she said professors across the political spectrum have voiced concerns to her.

“Feelings are very raw,” she said. The mood is “not just ‘Hey, my team didn’t win.’”

Professors have often shown reticence to engage in politically charged conversations in class, Ms. Murray said, and this caution existed well before President Trump’s election.

ADVERTISEMENT

Will I put off my students? How will those talks affect course evaluations? Will I stifle conversation? Questions like those are among their concerns, Ms. Murray said. Worries about tenure and promotion could deter some professors. And for many more, politics isn’t related to the curriculum in a way that makes it a common topic of conversation.

But faculty members seem even more reluctant now, she said. She’s heard liberal professors worry, “How could I talk about Trump and not make a face? How could I do this in a very measured way?”

Ms. Murray said conservative colleagues have confided in her “that they’re being treated differently, and they feel it’s because they’re perceived as Trump supporters.”

Over all, she said, many professors seem to avoid talking politics, seeing it as “poking the bear.”

Ground Rules

ADVERTISEMENT

For some professors, the trick lies in addressing policy without politicizing it.

Thomas Arcaro, a professor of sociology at Elon University, said he’s always careful about not appearing to be “proselytizing for any particular perspective.” But, he said, race, gender and other charged topics that his “Introduction to Sociology” class deals with are best seen “in action.” His past course evaluations indicate that students appreciate that he connects classroom discussions to current events, he said.

Part of the challenge this semester, he said, lies in describing events without appearing to push one particular viewpoint. Some faculty members have to do a “bit of gymnastics,” he said, to avoid making ad hominem or partisan statements, while still pointing out rhetoric or actions that are anomalous to U.S. politics or history.

I wouldn’t advise just walking in and saying, ‘Today we’re supposed to be learning about geography but instead we’re going to talk about —

Others said they’ll discuss policy if it’s related to course content, but may not name a particular political party or individual. Some suggested tying current political events to curricula in a deliberate but natural way.

A contemporary issue like Keystone XL — a controversial extension of an oil-pipeline project from Canada to the U.S. Gulf Coast — could be a prelude to a lecture on geography, for example. “I wouldn’t advise just walking in and saying, ‘Today we’re supposed to be learning about geography but instead we’re going to talk about —,’” Ms. Murray said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Mr. Barth, who is also the director of civic-engagement projects at Hendrix, said he thinks conversations are happening across disciplines about what the new administration’s policies — so far, many of them acted upon in a flurry of executive actions — mean for different fields. Others say introspection over how to address political dialogue now is largely confined to political- and social-science courses.

Ground rules can help keep conversations about politics civil. Steven Elliott-Gower, an associate professor of political science at Georgia College and State University, said some professors found it difficult not to discuss the election’s result because it was momentous.

Faculty members who did so, he said, would often preface those conversations with guidelines like not cutting others off mid-sentence.

Carly Schmitt, an assistant professor of political science at Indiana State University, taught a course on campaigns and elections in the fall and now teaches a class on leadership, ethics, and democracy.

Worried about what she saw as divisiveness in society, particularly on social media, she now enforces several policies in her classrooms: Students should avoid broad generalizations, keep conversations civil, and understand that differences of opinion are healthy for democracy. She challenges students who make statements based just on feeling or opinion, and will rein in conversations that she thinks are veering toward incivility.

ADVERTISEMENT

“When we are interacting with other people,” she tells her students, “we are interacting to learn more, we’re not interacting just to make a point.”

Balancing ‘the Heart and the Head’

Many professors said their students aren’t coming to class seeking out politically charged conversations, but if those conversations do come up organically, they’ll deal with them.

“We need to scaffold for our students how you have these tough conversations,” Ms. Murray, the Weber professor, said. “If we don’t talk about them in a civil way, when will our students learn how to discuss them?”

Mr. Barth said he concentrates on the analytical side of politics as a counter to his students’ passion; he said it creates a balance between “the heart and the head.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Though the new semester has just begun, he said the recent election has prompted him to think of refocusing his curriculum on broader questions: What should democracy look like? What should participation look like? Some of the more narrow topics he discussed before, he said, now seem less significant.

A version of this article appeared in the February 10, 2017, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

  • The Tricky Task of Teaching About Trump
  • Teaching Immigration Law in the Age of Trump
  • Trump as a Teaching Moment
  • Teaching Trump
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin