> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Post-Truth President

<h3>DONALD TRUMP</h3>

By  Evan Goldstein
December 11, 2016
POST-TRUTH 1

He ran against expertise, denounced political correctness, flouted standards of logic and reason, and indulged in conspiracy and innuendo. He valorized the undereducated and claimed that climate change was a hoax cooked up by the Chinese.

For many voters who went to the polls in November, truth was on the ballot. And academe was near-unanimous in its opposition to Donald J. Trump.

Now his victory is seen as a crisis for the academy. “This is the apocalypse,” says Nancy Kanwisher, a professor of brain and cognitive sciences at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “I don’t know anyone who isn’t horrified.” That sense of horror is about more than partisanship. It’s about a belief that Mr. Trump’s election, as the New York University sociologist Eric Klinenberg put it, is “a repudiation of everything universities stand for.”

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

POST-TRUTH 1

He ran against expertise, denounced political correctness, flouted standards of logic and reason, and indulged in conspiracy and innuendo. He valorized the undereducated and claimed that climate change was a hoax cooked up by the Chinese.

For many voters who went to the polls in November, truth was on the ballot. And academe was near-unanimous in its opposition to Donald J. Trump.

Now his victory is seen as a crisis for the academy. “This is the apocalypse,” says Nancy Kanwisher, a professor of brain and cognitive sciences at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “I don’t know anyone who isn’t horrified.” That sense of horror is about more than partisanship. It’s about a belief that Mr. Trump’s election, as the New York University sociologist Eric Klinenberg put it, is “a repudiation of everything universities stand for.”

He won the country’s highest office by eschewing facts and openly doubting scholarly expertise.

If the purpose of scholarship is to employ evidence and argument in the pursuit of truth — “veritas” is right there on the seals of Harvard and Yale — how viable is that pursuit in a culture where falsehoods trump facts? “‘Don’t bother me with facts’ is no longer a punchline,” Kathleen Higgins, a professor of philosophy at the University of Texas at Austin, wrote recently in Nature. “It has become a political stance.”

And that stance has unsettled academics. In the days after the election of the 70-year-old Mr. Trump, Ms. Kanwisher felt compelled to do something that she never before thought needed doing: defend the scientific method. She helped organize a statement that has now been signed by more than 500 of her MIT colleagues.

ADVERTISEMENT

2016-influencers-promo-names
The 2016 Influence List
The people who made a mark on higher education — for better or worse.
  • Curricular Activist
  • Affirmative-Action Convert
  • Stubborn Governor
  • Safe-Space Antagonist
  • Survivor
  • Competency Champion
  • Union Organizer
  • Inequality Fighter
  • Reconcilers

What’s at stake isn’t the meaning of truth — philosophers have been batting that around for centuries, with no end in sight — but the fate of those institutions, like universities, that have traditionally policed the line between fact and fiction. “This is a crisis of trust,” says Siva Vaidhyanathan, a professor of media studies at the University of Virginia. While anti-intellectualism runs deep in American life, he sees something more insidious underway: a rebellion against the institutions that produce expertise. “Scholars are trusted less than ever,” he says.

This crisis, of course, didn’t begin on November 9, and that fact suggests a way forward. “It’s simply wrong to imagine that Trump’s election somehow changed the status of truth overnight,” cautions the Harvard University historian Jill Lepore, “and in fact it’s a pernicious idea.” More important than Mr. Trump, she adds, “are the deeper and longer origins of this transformation, which can’t be fought against without being understood, and that, after all, is what the academy is for.”

A version of this article appeared in the December 16, 2016, issue.
Read other items in this The 2016 Influence List package.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Evan Goldstein
Evan Goldstein is a managing editor of The Chronicle and the editor of The Chronicle Review.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin