Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    University Transformation
Sign In
Research

Record Summer Heat Shifts Public Opinion on Global Warming

But some researchers find that economic factors predict acceptance of climate science better than the weather does

By Paul Basken September 3, 2012
Arid topsoil under a ruined crop in Logan, Kan. The drought’s only positive effect, according to agricultural researchers, is to convince people of the need for urgent action against climate change.
Arid topsoil under a ruined crop in Logan, Kan. The drought’s only positive effect, according to agricultural researchers, is to convince people of the need for urgent action against climate change.John Moore, Getty Images

Like many of the farmers and ranchers across his state, Michael J. Hayes of the University of Nebraska at Lincoln hopes he never again sees the kind of record heat and extreme drought that blasted the Midwest this summer.

The severe weather left behind decimated corn fields, withered pasture land, and heavy economic losses.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Like many of the farmers and ranchers across his state, Michael J. Hayes of the University of Nebraska at Lincoln hopes he never again sees the kind of record heat and extreme drought that blasted the Midwest this summer.

The severe weather left behind decimated corn fields, withered pasture land, and heavy economic losses.

Still, Mr. Hayes, an associate professor of natural resources and director of the National Drought Mitigation Center, says major heat waves do have at least one important value: They apparently can help convince people of the need for urgent action against climate change.

The key, as Mr. Hayes sees it from Lincoln, a city that had 11 days in July of triple-digit temperatures and most of the rest in the upper 90s, is to explain how hot summers and long-term climate change are related, while being careful about asserting definitive links: “We, as the proponents of climate change, could do a real disservice to the whole education of the public if we wrongly tie specific events” to the phenomenon.

And yet, after years of public- policy research, it’s not clear what exactly makes some Americans accept, and others reject, the established science of man-made climate change.

It stands to reason that unusually warm weather might help convert some nonbelievers. And surveys this year show that has happened. Recent polls by Gallup, the University of Texas at Austin, and the Brookings Institution all show upticks in public acceptance of climate-change science.

But the link isn’t necessarily logical. Climate often means weather on the scale of decades and centuries, and scientists emphasize that an unusual temperature swing for a few months or even a few years isn’t necessarily proof of anything.

“Some people think climate change is gradually turning up the thermostat all around the world,” said Barry G. Rabe, a professor of public policy and environmental policy at the Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy at the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor. “And that’s just not true.”

A Fickle Public

Mr. Rabe directs the Brookings National Survey of American Public Opinion on Climate Change, a multiyear series of polls being used to study the link between belief in climate change and short-term weather conditions. The nationwide surveys began in September 2008, when 72 percent of respondents agreed there was “solid evidence” that average global temperatures had risen over the previous four decades. That number dropped to 52 percent by April 2010, rose to 58 percent by December 2010, dipped again to 55 percent in April 2011, then began rising again, reaching 65 percent this past April.

That curved trend line, according to Mr. Rabe and his co-author, Christopher P. Borick, a professor of political science at Muhlenberg College, corresponds well with weather patterns in the country over that four-year period. The winters of 2009-10 and 2010-11, driven at least in part by the periodic El Niño climate phenomenon, were unusually cold and snowy in the United States and other parts of the Northern Hemisphere.

ADVERTISEMENT

Other researchers have found that even tests of more simple effects, such as holding surveys on hot days, have shown such unwarranted correlations.

One such study, released in July by researchers at New York and Temple Universities, found that for every three degrees above normal that local temperatures reached in the week before the day on which Americans were contacted for opinion polls, they were one percentage point more likely to agree there is “solid evidence” the earth is getting warmer.

The effects reverse as temperatures cool, “leaving no long-term impact of weather on public opinion,” the authors, Patrick J. Egan, an assistant professor of politics at NYU, and Megan Mullin, an associate professor of political science at Temple, wrote in the Journal of Politics.

Another study, published last year by researchers from the University of Chicago and the University of California at Berkeley, involved placing survey participants outside in the hot sun and indoors in overheated rooms. In both cases, hotter conditions at the moment of the questionnaire increased the likelihood of survey participants endorsing global warming as a proven fact.

ADVERTISEMENT

Many researchers accept the association with temperature, but believe other factors are even more important. They include Lyle A. Scruggs, a professor of political science at the University of Connecticut, who says economic conditions predict public acceptance of climate science better than weather does.

Mr. Scruggs has reviewed Gallup polls on climate and compared the results to the federal government’s monthly unemployment data. He has found that a one-percentage-point rise in unemployment decreases support for climate change by two percentage points, while a one-degree increase in the average winter temperature decreases support by about the same amount.

The economic indicator appears to be the stronger correlation, Mr. Scruggs said, because unemployment is more “real” to people than temperature, and because the unemployment rate “has fluctuated somewhat more over the last 20 years than winter temperatures have.” The linkage between a growing economy and a willingness to accept the science of climate change appears to be the result of widespread predictions—not necessarily well-founded—that tackling climate change would mean a net loss of jobs, Mr. Scruggs said.

Even those who found associations with temperature and economics agree there’s at least one other major factor: politics.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Weather matters, and it contributes to one’s ultimate position on the existence of climate change,” said Mr. Borick. “But if there is one factor that has the biggest effect, it would be political affiliation.”

Regardless of its relative ranking, the nation’s political environment clearly complicates efforts to attribute changes in beliefs to variations in weather or employment. The economy did begin improving in the early part of last year, at the same time average temperatures began rising. But that also covers a time period in which industry-financed skeptics intensified their attacks on the science of climate change, beating back attempts in Congress to limit carbon emissions.

Beyond Opinion Polls

Some researchers find a fundamental limit to even the importance of public opinion. Jon A. Krosnick, a professor of political science, communication, and psychology at Stanford University, has been conducting surveys on climate change since the 1990s, and he’s concluded that the public is far more supportive of the science than most polls suggest.

Mr. Krosnick specializes in constructing opinion polls in ways that avoid posing questions that introduce a bias. By using phrasing he regards as more neutral than seen in most polls, he said his surveys have consistently found that about 85 percent of Americans accept that the climate is warming and endorse steps—even if it means higher costs—to address it.

ADVERTISEMENT

Such high levels of agreement are “very rare” on major questions of public policy, Mr. Krosnick said. He agrees there’s some evidence that short-term weather affects opinions on climate, and sees little if any evidence that the economy does. The key division he sees is between the two-thirds of the U.S. population inclined to trust scientists, whose acceptance of global warming is strong, and the one-third not inclined to trust scientists, whose assessments about climate can be affected by fluctuations in the weather.

“So weather does matter, but it matters in a very particular way,” Mr. Krosnick said.

Others have identified a similar phenomenon. A team led by Teresa A. Myers, a postdoctoral researcher at George Mason University’s Center for Climate Change Communication, reviewed national survey results to conclude in a study this year that weather conditions do influence attitudes among people who aren’t ideologically predisposed. They look for proof of their existing beliefs.

“Among those people already highly engaged in the issue—whether alarmed or dismissive—prior beliefs exerted a strong influence on their perceived experience,” Ms. Myers wrote. “While for people less engaged, the reverse was true.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Mr. Rabe and Mr. Borick reported much the same. In their April 2011 survey, following the two unusually cold winters, 43 percent of those rejecting the science of climate change cited personal observations as their most important reason. A year later, amid a warmer weather pattern, only 20 percent cited personal observations. Many more disbelievers began citing religious factors or suspicions of political manipulation, Mr. Borick said.

Whatever the causes, the country as a whole may not demand action until more crises accumulate, said James R. Angel, an adjunct instructor in atmospheric science at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, who serves as state climatologist.

“We have seen it for years in things like drought planning and response to tornado warnings,” Mr. Angel said. “If we haven’t had a drought in a while, everyone gets complacent about planning and responding to drought. Needless to say, a lot of people are thinking a lot more about drought these days.”

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Scholarship & Research
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Paul Basken Bio
About the Author
Paul Basken
Paul Basken was a government policy and science reporter with The Chronicle of Higher Education, where he won an annual National Press Club award for exclusives.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

Economy and Weather Show Which Way the (Political) Wind Blows

More News

Illustration of a magnifying glass highlighting the phrase "including the requirements set forth in Presidential Executive Order 14168 titled Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government."
Policy 'Whiplash'
Research Grants Increasingly Require Compliance With Trump’s Orders. Here’s How Colleges Are Responding.
Photo illustration showing internal email text snippets over a photo of a University of Iowa campus quad
Red-state reticence
Facing Research Cuts, Officials at U. of Iowa Spoke of a ‘Limited Ability to Publicly Fight This’
Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues

From The Review

Photo-based illustration of a tentacle holding a microscope
The Review | Essay
In Defense of ‘Silly’ Science
By Carly Anne York
Illustration showing a graduate's hand holding a college diploma and another hand but a vote into a ballot box
The Review | Essay
Civics Education Is Back. It Shouldn’t Belong to Conservatives.
By Timothy Messer-Kruse
Photo-based illustration of a hedges shaped like dollar signs in various degrees of having been over-trimmed by a shadowed Donald Trump figure carrying hedge trimmers.
The Review | Essay
What Will Be Left of Higher Ed in Four Years?
By Brendan Cantwell

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: A Global Leadership Perspective
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin