> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
News
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Report Urges Universities to Be More Realistic in Tech-Transfer Hopes and Deals

By  Goldie Blumenstyk
October 4, 2010

Technology transfer should be a high priority for research universities, but they should become more realistic about the limited potential for making lots of money from the commercialization of their research, says a new report from the National Academy of Sciences.

When it comes to making money, “the likelihood of success is small, the probability of disappointed expectations high, and the risk of distorting and narrowing” the dissemination of new knowledge broadly in society through other means is exacerbated, warns the report, “Managing University Intellectual Property in the Public Interest.”

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

Technology transfer should be a high priority for research universities, but they should become more realistic about the limited potential for making lots of money from the commercialization of their research, says a new report from the National Academy of Sciences.

When it comes to making money, “the likelihood of success is small, the probability of disappointed expectations high, and the risk of distorting and narrowing” the dissemination of new knowledge broadly in society through other means is exacerbated, warns the report, “Managing University Intellectual Property in the Public Interest.”

Developed by a panel of 18 academic and industry officials over the past two years, the report’s 15 recommendations also include a call for universities and federal science agencies to devise a system to better measure the broader social and economic impact of technology transfer. Such a new system, the report says, should go beyond existing surveys that now tally things like patents, licenses, and royalty income.

Perhaps reflecting the interests of its corporate members and the complaints often raised by industry about universities’ driving hard bargains for the commercial rights to their intellectual property, the report recommends that institutions be more generous in offering terms to research sponsors in industry and be more willing to give them full ownership of research they have sponsored. (The Rochester Institute of Technology and other institutions have been experimenting with such a model.)

The report rejects suggestions like the “free-agency” proposal pushed by the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, which would allow faculty inventors greater leeway in managing how their research findings are commercialized with approval from their university. But the report does urge universities to rely more heavily on the expertise of faculty members and experienced business people in day-to-day operations and oversight of their often-criticized technology-transfer operations.

ADVERTISEMENT

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Goldie Blumenstyk
The veteran reporter Goldie Blumenstyk writes a weekly newsletter, The Edge, about the people, ideas, and trends changing higher education. Find her on Twitter @GoldieStandard. She is also the author of the bestselling book American Higher Education in Crisis? What Everyone Needs to Know.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin