Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Hands-On Career Preparation
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    Alternative Pathways
Sign In
News

Research-Assignment Handouts Give Students Meager Guidance, Survey Finds

By Kelly Truong July 27, 2010

Most research-assignment handouts given to undergraduates fail to guide the students toward a comprehensive strategy for completing the work, according to two researchers at the University of Washington who are studying how students conduct research and find information.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Most research-assignment handouts given to undergraduates fail to guide the students toward a comprehensive strategy for completing the work, according to two researchers at the University of Washington who are studying how students conduct research and find information.

And despite “seismic changes in the way that information is now created and delivered,” most such handouts call for a traditional research paper, the researchers say in a progress report on Project Information Literacy, a continuing national study based at the university’s Information School.

The researchers found that while handouts typically contain instructions on the mechanics of constructing a paper, few offer a full explanation of the research process.

“They really felt like road maps with destinations, but no street names,” said Alison J. Head, co-director of Project Information Literacy.

Professors expect students to be proactive enough to find sources on their own by the time they reach college, said Ms. Head, yet they frequently end up with research papers that fail to do more than meet formulaic standards.

Faculty members interviewed for the study expressed few assumptions about their students’ abilities to conduct research. An anonymous humanities instructor quoted in the report estimated that 95 percent of his or her students “really don’t have much of a clue about completing research assignments.”

Ms. Head and her fellow director, Michael B. Eisenberg, analyzed 191 research-assignment handouts given to undergraduates at 28 colleges across the country, in courses spanning a range of academic disciplines.

They found that a majority of the handouts specified rules such as page length and citation style, but offered limited recommendations for research sources. The advice found in the handouts reflected a traditional approach to research, said Ms. Head.

Sixty percent of the handouts directed students toward library shelves, while 43 percent suggested that students use online library sources. However, only 13 percent suggested that students consult a librarian during the research process.

“The process of research is being represented as linear, instead of a process that’s organic,” said Ms. Head.

A ‘Google-First Mentality’?

Approximately one-quarter of the handouts suggested using the Internet as a research tool, while 13 percent discouraged or prohibited students from using any Web sites.

ADVERTISEMENT

According to Ms. Head, professors who prohibit the use of the Internet typically fall into one of two categories: those whose assignments depend on primary sources, such as direct interviews with subjects, and those wary of the “Google-first mentality” prevalent among many undergraduates.

However, she said, the latter group of professors may underestimate students’ ability to process information, given their familiarity with the Internet.

“Things have changed so much, but assignments haven’t,” she said. “Digital natives are different, and teaching them is different.”

The study found that 83 percent of assignment handouts called for a standard individual research paper, as opposed to alternatives such as collaborative, oral, or multimedia projects.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ms. Head and Mr. Eisenberg analyzed handouts for the diversity of their suggested sources, combing them for recommendations of library resources, course readings, primary sources, and the Internet as elements in the research process. Assignments in the arts and humanities were the most likely to suggest all of those resources.

The researchers say handouts should provide more. “An ideal assignment might be, ‘Pull something from YouTube and also look at New York Times coverage, and also you might want to look at how the wire services cover it,’” said Ms. Head.

“There’s a voyeuristic quality to handouts,” she said. Professors may ask themselves, “Am I doing the right thing here?”

“I think this study gives professors an opportunity to question whether they’re accomplishing what they want to do with their handouts and whether, if they included different details, it might give them better research papers at the end of the day,” she said.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Marva Johnson is set to take the helm of Florida A&M University this summer.
Leadership & governance
‘Surprising': A DeSantis-Backed Lobbyist Is Tapped to Lead Florida A&M
Students and community members protest outside of Coffman Memorial Union at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis, on Tuesday, April 23, 2024.
Campus Activism
One Year After the Encampments, Campuses Are Quieter and Quicker to Stop Protests
Hoover-NBERValue-0516 002 B
Diminishing Returns
Why the College Premium Is Shrinking for Low-Income Students
Harvard University
'Deeply Unsettling'
Harvard’s Battle With Trump Escalates as Research Money Is Suddenly Canceled

From The Review

Glenn Loury in Providence, R.I. on May 7, 2024.
The Review | Conversation
Glenn Loury on the ‘Barbarians at the Gates’
By Evan Goldstein, Len Gutkin
Illustration showing a valedictorian speaker who's tassel is a vintage microphone
The Review | Opinion
A Graduation Speaker Gets Canceled
By Corey Robin
Illustration showing a stack of coins and a university building falling over
The Review | Opinion
Here’s What Congress’s Endowment-Tax Plan Might Cost Your College
By Phillip Levine

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin