Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
Leadership

Rogue Trustee in Texas Stirs Debate on His Role

By Jack Stripling April 18, 2014
Supporters of Wallace L. Hall Jr. say that asking tough questions is an important part of a trustee’s role.
Supporters of Wallace L. Hall Jr. say that asking tough questions is an important part of a trustee’s role. Bob Daemmrich

The University of Texas system has spent the past two years airing plenty of dirty laundry, and that is thanks in large part to Wallace L. Hall Jr.

Mr. Hall, who was appointed to the Texas Board of Regents in 2011, has made it his mission to look into the dark corners of the university, focusing much of his attention on the flagship campus in Austin, where Mr. Hall has questioned spending and admissions decisions. With the gusto of a muckraking reporter, the Texas businessman has spent hours and hours sifting through boxes of university documents, searching for evidence of sweetheart deals or even coverups.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

The University of Texas system has spent the past two years airing plenty of dirty laundry, and that is thanks in large part to Wallace L. Hall Jr.

Mr. Hall, who was appointed to the Texas Board of Regents in 2011, has made it his mission to look into the dark corners of the university, focusing much of his attention on the flagship campus in Austin, where Mr. Hall has questioned spending and admissions decisions. With the gusto of a muckraking reporter, the Texas businessman has spent hours and hours sifting through boxes of university documents, searching for evidence of sweetheart deals or even coverups.

Mr. Hall may sound like just the sort of highly engaged board member that colleges need right now, when trustees are often criticized for failing to spot crises in the making. But Mr. Hall’s critics describe the regent as a conservative ideologue whose only real goal is to embarrass and fire William C. Powers Jr., president of the University of Texas at Austin. To his detractors, Mr. Hall’s investigations are little more than witch hunts that distract the board from its important oversight role.

A recent report to a state legislative committee agreed that Mr. Hall had overstepped some lines. In fact, his actions—including the issuance of “unreasonable and burdensome requests for records"—could be grounds for impeachment, said the report, made public this month, which was written by a special counsel to the Texas House Select Committee on Transparency in State Agency Operations.

The regent could also face criminal charges for disclosing private student information, which was included in records he obtained.

Mr. Hall’s unconventional tactics as a regent raise important questions for college boards: Where is the line between effective oversight of an institution and outright harassment or micromanagement? As trustees are pressed to be more aggressive in seeking out information, how far can they go without overstepping their bounds?

Shannon H. Ratliff, a former vice chairman of the University of Texas Board of Regents, says he is convinced that Mr. Hall’s investigations amount to fishing expeditions with no real strategic purpose. Beginning in 2012, for example, Mr. Hall made a series of requests for copies of all of the records requests the Austin campus received and all of the responses it provided.

“I don’t see anything he’s doing as having a constructive impetus,” Mr. Ratliff says.

Regents are responsible for overseeing nine universities and six health institutions, but Mr. Hall has focused like a laser on the flagship.

“The obsessive attention that Wallace Hall is giving UT-Austin is like nothing I have ever seen,” says Mr. Ratliff, a lawyer based in Austin.

Records Requests

During Mr. Hall’s tenure, the Austin campus has emerged as a key battleground in a statewide debate over whether professors place too much emphasis on research at the expense of teaching. That debate was largely set into motion by Jeff Sandefer, an influential Texas oilman, whom Mr. Hall listed as a reference on his application to the Board of Regents.

ADVERTISEMENT

Mr. Hall is often perceived to be carrying out Mr. Sandefer’s agenda, which has the support of Gov. Rick Perry, a Republican, who appointed Mr. Hall to the board.

Mr. Powers, the flagship campus’s president, has pushed back hard against Mr. Sandefer’s proposals, which include tying faculty pay to student evaluations. In his 2011 State of the University Address, the president cast the battle in the bleakest and grandest of terms.

“To paraphrase Lincoln, we are a house divided about our fundamental mission and character,” he said. “The University of Texas can survive a robust debate among people with very different views about how we operate, but it won’t survive as one of the world’s great research and teaching universities—let alone become the best public university in America—if we remain divided about our fundamental mission and character, about our very soul. And we won’t move forward unless we’re all candid about this.

“That, I’m sorry to say, is the current state of our university.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Mr. Hall has focused his investigations directly on Mr. Powers, whom he has described as untrustworthy. Mr. Hall has filed records requests, for example, for all of Mr. Powers’s personal and business travel expenses for the length of his eight-year presidency.

Last fall, when Mr. Hall had not received the travel expenses from Mr. Powers in a timely fashion, the regent aired his frustrations in an email to a system official.

“Virtually zero accountability with this gentleman,” Mr. Hall wrote in October. “What is your plan?”

Mr. Hall, who declined to speak with The Chronicle on the record, said in a regents meeting last year that combing through records requests submitted by others could reveal “significant issues of concern” to the board. A review of those records piqued Mr. Hall’s interest in a controversial compensation program in Austin’s law school, where Mr. Powers was dean before becoming president.

ADVERTISEMENT

Lawrence G. Sager, the law school’s former dean, received a $500,000 forgivable loan through the program. He resigned in 2011 amid controversy over the money.

Mr. Hall has also requested copies of all of Mr. Powers’s email exchanges with lawmakers. The regent says he has concerns that members of the Legislature have used their influence to secure admission into the university for friends and relatives.

In all, Mr. Hall has requested some 800,000 pages of documents, a university official estimated in legislative testimony. Mr. Hall has vehemently disputed that estimate, pegging the number at somewhere below 100,000.

Terrence J. MacTaggart, a consultant for the Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges, says it is simply impractical for trustees to scan the contents of hundreds or thousands of records requests with the goal of spotting something amiss.

ADVERTISEMENT

“They are duplicating what the auditor and the security force and the legal counsel do,” says Mr. MacTaggart, who twice served as chancellor of the University of Maine system. “It seems like a misplaced priority when a board member is doing that job.”

If trustees are concerned about wrongdoing, they are better served by helping to develop strong whistle-blower policies or improving universitywide risk assessment, Mr. MacTaggart says.

“It’s a more systematic approach, rather than having an individual board member think they are going to ferret this out, particularly at a school the size of the University of Texas,” he says.

Penn State Looms

Mr. Hall’s supporters usually have a ready answer for critics of his aggressive style: Consider what happened at Pennsylvania State University. An independent investigation of the child-sex-abuse scandal there laid significant blame at the feet of trustees, who failed to ask tough questions that may have exposed the problem years earlier.

ADVERTISEMENT

Anne D. Neal, president of the American Council of Trustees and Alumni, says the Penn State scandal proves that college boards need more members like Mr. Hall, not fewer.

“The problem we see is not trustees asking too many questions,” she says. “The problem we see is trustees not asking enough questions.”

If trustees do not raise these issues, she argues, “we end up risking the situation like we saw at Penn State, where the administration was far more interested in looking good than investigating serious criminal activity.”

In the wake of the abuse scandal, Penn State’s alumni elected to the board Anthony P. Lubrano, founder of a wealth-management firm in Pennsylvania. From the start, Mr. Lubrano has challenged what he describes as the “old guard” on the board, who he says believe that “new members should be seen and not heard.” He has ignored that advice, pressing university officials to provide him with detailed information about athletics spending, among other areas. He says there has been pushback.

ADVERTISEMENT

“They were reluctant to share that information, because they thought it would lead to micromanaging,” Mr. Lubrano says. “Micromanaging would be me telling you where to buy your pencils.”

Mr. Lubrano says he has an obligation to “independently verify” information that he receives, “as opposed to the mind-set of the sheep, who say we should not challenge or question because some would view that as micromanaging.”

Matter of Tone

Much of the criticism leveled at Mr. Hall concerns his tone, and the special counsel’s report shows flashes of abrasiveness from the regent, who is described as “intense and vindictive.”

Last summer Mr. Hall was frustrated that Mr. Powers had not been fired; the system’s chancellor feared that doing so would have an “adverse” affect on the university, according to a regent’s notes from a closed meeting that were published this month. Mr. Hall complained that the board was being “held hostage by terrorists,” the counsel’s report states. Any outcry over Mr. Powers’s termination, Mr. Hall said, would last no more than “two weeks.” (In an email contained in the report’s exhibits, Mr. Hall uses the word “captors” rather than “terrorists.”)

ADVERTISEMENT

Mr. Hall has focused intently on “ruining” Mr. Powers, the report states, but other university officials have been caught in the crossfire as well. Francisco G. Cigarroa, chancellor of the Texas system, is among those whom Mr. Hall has tried to “disparage,” the board’s chairman said in an email to the chancellor.

Dr. Cigarroa, a pediatric surgeon, actually shared Mr. Hall’s concerns that Austin’s president was “essentially insubordinate,” recent reports indicate, but the chancellor believed that firing Mr. Powers would create more problems. Dr. Cigarroa’s continued support of Mr. Powers opened a rift between the chancellor and Mr. Hall, who aired his frustrations in emails.

“As you know, I share your distrust of Austin’s leadership,” Mr. Hall wrote to Dr. Cigarroa on January 29. “With that said, how do you justify and defend his behavior?”

Less than two weeks after that email, Dr. Cigarroa announced his intention to resign and take a position as head of pediatric-transplant surgery at the University of Texas Health Science Center in San Antonio.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Though Cigarroa never cited his working relationship with Hall as a basis for leaving,” the report states, “one would be hard pressed to fault a person in Cigarroa’s position for growing weary of Hall’s bullying attitude.”

For Mr. Hall, the occasional rough-and-tumble exchange appears to come with the job. Speaking to his fellow regents at a meeting last year, he said the difficult work of college governance sometimes gets messy.

“It would be wonderful if cheering for our institutions was the sum total of what I think our responsibility is, but it’s not,” he said. “Some things that we have to do are not pleasant, but it doesn’t mean that we don’t do them.”

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Leadership & Governance
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
stripling-jack.jpg
About the Author
Jack Stripling
Jack Stripling is a senior writer at The Chronicle and host of its podcast, College Matters from The Chronicle. Follow him on Twitter @jackstripling.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin