Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
Sign In
Photo illustration superimposing a 2000s-era photo of Lynne Cheney over Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis
Chronicle illustration; photos from Octavio Jones, Getty Images and Harry Hamburg/NY Daily News Archive via Getty Images

Ron DeSantis and the Specter of Lynne Cheney

Conservatives have long refused to accept that America’s past is complicated.

The Review | Opinion
By Steven Conn February 8, 2023

Ron DeSantis is partying like it’s 1994. You could almost hear Mariah Carey and Ace of Base playing in the background at the press conference where the Florida governor announced he was banning the new AP course on African American studies. Squint hard enough at the photos taken at the presser and I think you can see Lynne Cheney hovering over the proceedings. Three decades ago Cheney got that party started.

In 1986 Ronald Reagan appointed Cheney to chair the National Endowment for the Humanities, a chair she sat in until George H.W. Bush left office in January 1993. Way back then, a lot of folks worried about the state of K-12 education in the nation’s schools, and history education in particular. In an effort to improve the situation, the National Council on History Standards was created in 1992. The group was

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Ron DeSantis is partying like it’s 1994. You could almost hear Mariah Carey and Ace of Base playing in the background at the news conference where the Florida governor announced he was banning the new AP course on African American studies. Squint hard enough at the photos taken at the presser and I think you can see Lynne Cheney hovering over the proceedings. Three decades ago, Cheney got that party started.

In 1986 Ronald Reagan appointed Cheney to chair the National Endowment for the Humanities, a chair she sat in until George H.W. Bush left office in January 1993. Way back then, a lot of folks worried about the state of K-12 education in the nation’s schools, and history education in particular. In an effort to improve the situation, the National Council for History Standards was created in 1992. The group was charged with creating a set of voluntary guidelines to make the teaching of history more uniform across the country and to improve the quality of what kids learned.

Truth isn’t simply the first victim of any culture war; it’s the primary target.

The council brought together a wide group of educators from across the spectrum, and they worked for the better part of two years to develop a consensus about what frameworks should shape the standards. They planned to release the standards late in 1994. Oh, and the whole project was funded by Lynne Cheney’s NEH.

Cheney beat the group to the punch. In October 1994, by then ex-chair Cheney published an opinion piece in The Wall Street Journal denouncing the standards, which had not yet been released. Had she read them? Probably not, but she had inside information from unnamed informants about the contents. “Imagine an outline for the teaching of American history in which George Washington makes only a fleeting appearance,” she fulminated, “Or in which the foundings of the Sierra Club and the National Organization for Women are considered noteworthy events, but the first gathering of the U.S. Congress is not.” Her piece ignited a national outcry of Limbaughian proportions.

Was this all true? Well ... the standards did incorporate several decades of academic research into the history of working people, women, Black and Native Americans, immigrants, and others who had been left out of the old-fashioned narratives of presidents and generals. That research, in turn, had helped foster a broader recognition that the United States is a multicultural experiment and always has been. The history standards broadened and deepened what ought to be taught. George Washington wasn’t out in the new standards, but the Parson Weems version of him was.

But truth isn’t simply the first victim of any culture war; it’s the primary target. I’m not sure even Cheney believed what she wrote in 1994; that was hardly the point. The point was that Bill Clinton had beaten George H.W. Bush in 1992, to the fury of conservatives, putting an end to their dreams of a thousand-year Reaganite reich. The History Standards were labeled as subversive anti-American leftist indoctrination.

If the standards reflected the work of scholars in the early 1990s, then the outrage they generated also reflected a national identity crisis at that time. For conservatives this was, after all, America’s “We’re No. 1!” moment — the Cold War “won,” America triumphant and unfettered. The idea that America’s past might be more complicated than that facile triumphalist narrative, that Thomas Jefferson could be both the author of the Declaration and an unrepentant slave owner, was simply more than conservatives could manage.

The new AP course arrives at a similar moment. Over the past generation there has been a remarkable efflorescence of first-rate historical scholarship about the history of Black America that simply can’t be ignored if you want to understand our nation’s past more fully. At the same time, a significant portion of the country still feels some sense of a national identity crisis. There has again been a renewed urgency to reckon more honestly with the nation’s past. The fact that we have teleported back to 1994 is a reminder that every time the country changes significantly we will wind up fighting over the past. The revanchists, upset with a present that scares them, take refuge in a version of the past that makes them feel better. They get angry when they learn that the good ol’ days ain’t what they used to be. Never mind that they never were.

“Revisionism” is often the charge conservatives level at new historical ideas, but in fact all history is revisionist history, and it always has been. History changes all the time — because we find new sources, ask new questions, and rethink the perspectives of historians from earlier generations. Needless to say, the baying mob that mobilized against the History Standards did not understand that. “History is real simple,” Rush Limbaugh sputtered to his radio audience. “It’s what happened.”

Revanchists get angry when they learn that the good ol’ days ain’t what they used to be. Never mind that they never were.

What was “politically correct” back in the 1990s is “woke” today. If Limbaugh weren’t dead, I would swear he was using Manny Diaz Jr., Florida’s education commissioner, as a ventriloquist’s dummy. Back then Limbaugh summarized the standards as “a bunch of PC crap.” Last month Diaz mimicked: “We do not accept woke indoctrination masquerading as education.” An inadvertently funny choice of words since Florida’s so-called Anti-WOKE law is a dog’s dinner of far-right ideology masquerading as educational legislation.

Nearly 30 years later, DeSantis stood before the cameras doing his best Lynne Cheney impersonation. He declared that the new AP African American studies curriculum “lacks educational value,” though it is not clear that he (or anyone else in Florida) has actually read it. He went on to say that the course “is contrary to Florida law” though no Florida official has specified what law the course breaks and how. I will give this to DeSantis: His attack on African American history is more openly and honestly racist than Cheney’s charge against the History Standards was back in the day.

DeSantis’s reboot of the Lynne Cheney Show forces a revision of the famous Marxist adage: The attack on history was a farce the first time, and the second time has become even more farcical. In the end, Lynne Cheney didn’t kill the History Standards. They were adopted by hundreds of districts across the country and did the good work they were intended to do. The College Board may — or may not — have caved to Florida’s Know-Nothings with their recently announced “revisions” in the course, but I suspect folks there are smiling all the same. Thanks to Ron DeSantis, more people are now rallying to the new AP African American studies course than the College Board could ever have hoped for.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Academic Freedom Political Influence & Activism Free Speech Opinion Law & Policy
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Steven Conn
Steven Conn is a professor of history at Miami University, in Ohio, and helps run the project Picturing Black History, in collaboration with Getty Images.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Illustration of a magnifying glass highlighting the phrase "including the requirements set forth in Presidential Executive Order 14168 titled Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government."
Policy 'Whiplash'
Research Grants Increasingly Require Compliance With Trump’s Orders. Here’s How Colleges Are Responding.
Photo illustration showing internal email text snippets over a photo of a University of Iowa campus quad
Red-state reticence
Facing Research Cuts, Officials at U. of Iowa Spoke of a ‘Limited Ability to Publicly Fight This’
Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues

From The Review

Football game between UCLA and Colorado University, at Folsom Field in Boulder, Colo., Sept. 24, 2022.
The Review | Opinion
My University Values Football More Than Education
By Sigman Byrd
Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin