> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • Student Success Resource Center
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Safe-Space Antagonist

<h3>JOHN ELLISON</h3>

By  Beth McMurtrie
December 11, 2016
Safe-Space 1
U. of Chicago

It was the tone of the letter that caught people’s attention. Like a father lecturing his rambunctious children at the dinner table, John (Jay) Ellison, 55, dean of students at the University of Chicago, warned incoming freshmen that he wasn’t about to put up with any nonsense.

“Our commitment to academic freedom,” he wrote in a welcome letter this summer, “means that we do not support so-called ‘trigger warnings,’ we do not cancel invited speakers because their topics might prove controversial, and we do not condone the creation of intellectual ‘safe spaces,’ where individuals can retreat from ideas and perspectives at odds with their own.”

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

Safe-Space 1
U. of Chicago

It was the tone of the letter that caught people’s attention. Like a father lecturing his rambunctious children at the dinner table, John (Jay) Ellison, 55, dean of students at the University of Chicago, warned incoming freshmen that he wasn’t about to put up with any nonsense.

“Our commitment to academic freedom,” he wrote in a welcome letter this summer, “means that we do not support so-called ‘trigger warnings,’ we do not cancel invited speakers because their topics might prove controversial, and we do not condone the creation of intellectual ‘safe spaces,’ where individuals can retreat from ideas and perspectives at odds with their own.”

While that sentence was only part of a longer letter, Mr. Ellison’s curt rejection of a growing phenomenon on college campuses went viral, putting the University of Chicago at the forefront of a national debate over political correctness, the perceived coddling of college students, and the limits of free speech.

The like-minded rejoiced that Chicago, long seen as a champion of free expression, had dumped hypersensitivity into the bin of Bad Liberal Ideas. College students, they feared, had gotten so caught up in identity politics that they were refusing to engage with people outside of their small spheres. They considered Mr. Ellison the perfect messenger. The Chicago Tribune’s editorial board called his letter “refreshingly direct.”

He took a campus debate national by challenging safe spaces.

But others found it insulting and misinformed. Safe spaces and trigger warnings aren’t a retreat from tough intellectual discourse, they said, but a sign that all perspectives are respected. To them Mr. Ellison’s words were an example of the arrogance with which those in power marginalize the concerns of those different from themselves. “Oftentimes,” said one student, Elizabeth Adetiba, “the people who are defining free speech are people of a certain demographic": well off, white, and male.

ADVERTISEMENT

As the academic year began, leaders of other colleges, including Yale and Bowdoin, also challenged their new students to engage with uncomfortable ideas. And Mr. Ellison’s critique led to a deeper examination of how safe spaces and trigger warnings are actually used. (As it turns out, you can find both at Chicago.)

2016-influencers-promo-names
The 2016 Influence List
The people who made a mark on higher education — for better or worse.
  • Curricular Activist
  • Affirmative-Action Convert
  • Stubborn Governor
  • Survivor
  • Post-Truth President
  • Competency Champion
  • Union Organizer
  • Inequality Fighter
  • Reconcilers

Mr. Ellison never expected his letter to get so much attention but says he was pleased by the conversations it sparked. What his champions and critics alike are wrestling with is how college campuses should function in an increasingly diverse — and divided — America. The coming together of students of different races, religions, ideologies, economic classes, and sexual identities has fueled complicated movements.

Minority students are asking for their own spaces on campus. But is that a celebration of multiculturalism or the promotion of segregation? Some students want to ban hyperpartisan speakers. Are they shutting down debate or rejecting hate speech? And if a victim of sexual assault is surprised by a discussion of violence in class, is it her responsibility to shoulder her feelings, or should her professor have better prepared her?

There are no easy answers, of course, and tensions are likely to increase in 2017. The presidential election has hardened viewpoints and fostered even more polarizing speech. Social media seems to magnify every conflict. And inflammatory websites promote anger, fear, and misinformation.

College, Mr. Ellison wrote in an email to The Chronicle reflecting on the public reaction to his letter, should be a place where people develop the ability to bridge such divides. “It is important to openly discuss the challenges that come with being a part of an academic community where diverse perspectives, experiences, individuals, and ideas inform and stimulate intellectual exchange, challenge, and engagement,” he wrote. “We all struggle with these issues, including the faculty, students, and staff at the University of Chicago, and it’s worth remembering that freedom of expression entails a willingness to listen to others.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Beth McMurtrie writes about campus culture, among other things. Follow her on Twitter @bethmcmurtrie, or email her at beth.mcmurtrie@chronicle.com.

A version of this article appeared in the December 16, 2016, issue.
Read other items in this The 2016 Influence List package.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Beth McMurtrie
Beth McMurtrie is a senior writer for The Chronicle of Higher Education, where she writes about the future of learning and technology’s influence on teaching. In addition to her reported stories, she helps write the weekly Teaching newsletter about what works in and around the classroom. Email her at beth.mcmurtrie@chronicle.com, and follow her on Twitter @bethmcmurtrie.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin