Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
The Review

Scholarly prose gets a bad rap. Is it deserved?

June 4, 2017

Sometimes. I recently had an editorial consultant tell me that manuscripts come to publishers in much worse shape than they used to because the university secretaries who used to edit and format the professors’ work have disappeared.—Leila Salisbury

•

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Sometimes. I recently had an editorial consultant tell me that manuscripts come to publishers in much worse shape than they used to because the university secretaries who used to edit and format the professors’ work have disappeared.—Leila Salisbury

•

I get frustrated when critics attack scholarly language and pull language out of a scholarly monograph with little context to make their point. It can at times even seem anti-intellectual. Scholars often change a field radically through a book that is intellectually complex, with complicated language, and those books are important to publish alongside those titles that are more accessible. —Brian Halley

•

Review - Publishing Package
The Future of the University Press
Publishers, press directors, editors, scholars, and other insiders share their views on the state and future of academic publishing.
  • Our Contributors
  • What is the most common misunderstanding that scholars have about university presses?
  • Do we need more university presses? Fewer?
  • How will university presses look 20 years from now?
  • How should the university press role in hiring and promotion change?
  • What book do you wish someone would write?
  • What is the biggest challenge in university-press publishing?
  • Acquisitions editors are overwhelmingly white. How does this affect what gets published?
  • What topic areas are overpublished?

Yes — and no. The academy is absolutely right to encourage the kinds of ideas that are most concisely expressed with a $12 word. But if those ideas can’t also be explained in clear, accessible language, you have to wonder whether there is a clear idea there at all. — Elizabeth Branch Dyson

•

It doesn’t deserve the bad rap. Academics write about the most complicated subjects in the world. They have to use specialized language, draw on obscure bodies of knowledge, and convey their ideas with the sort of precision and attention to minor distinctions that would paralyze most journalists. Inevitably, much of what they write will not be accessible to nonspecialists or, for that matter, their editors. And many scholars do an extraordinary job of making incredibly complex ideas comprehensible. —Ian Malcolm

•

It often is deserved. Why cannot more people who write about the arts write like Pauline Kael and Greil Marcus and Mary Gaitskill or Ingrid Rowland or John O’Malley, S.J.? —Lindsay Waters

•

Probably. Not everyone can be Steven Pinker! Scholarly prose has improved, though, since the excesses of the 1980s. Few scholars today can afford to speak in language that does not carry across fields. —Gita Devi Manaktala

•

We regularly talk with scholars in developmental stages who understand that their book may have a real market beyond the academy if written a certain way. And then they become beholden to the demands of their advisers who want things done as they always have been. Tenure committees, please allow scholars the latitude to write to the fullest potential of their material! —James McCoy

•

All too often one finds a thicket of opaque prose and jargon that at best obfuscates meaning, at worst covers for the sad fact that there are no ideas. I have developed the five-page rule for proposals or manuscripts. If, by Page 5, I do not understand what the book is about, I reject it. —Beatrice Rehl

•

An author has the obligation to seduce the reader, so that we’ll want to and, indeed, have to read the story being told. —Sandra Dijkstra

•

I would like to see university presses publish fewer books but take more time to work with each author they do select.—Caitlin Zaloom

•

Overly jargoned writing is the greatest barrier to impact. Length is the other. Readers are impatient with both.—Greg Britton

•

Most scholars get a very bad and chronic case of dissertation-itis in grad school and never, ever get over it. Most scholars — all of us, in fact — have one “go to” sentence structure to which we default unconsciously. —Carey Newman

•

The biggest question here is what audience we expect scholars to write for — one of peers in their own subdiscipline or a broader array of more-general readers? Of course, the answer may vary by project. I sometimes fear that scholars become so expert at writing to a comparatively narrow group of peers that they are less well positioned to do the ever more vital work of reaching a broader public. —Roger Schonfeld

•

Alas, its reputation is deserved and is certainly responsible for part of the decline in sales. Too much jargon, too much posturing. —Wendy Strothman

•

A good editor can fix that. —Joshua Gans

A version of this article appeared in the June 9, 2017, issue.
Read other items in The Future of the University Press.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Opinion
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Protesters attend a demonstration in support of Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil, March 10, 2025, in New York.
First-Amendment Rights
Noncitizen Professors Testify About Chilling Effect of Others’ Detentions
Photo-based illustration of a rock preciously suspended by a rope over three beakers.
Broken Promise
U.S. Policy Made America’s Research Engine the Envy of the World. One President Could End That.
lab-costs-promo.jpg
Research Expenses
What Does It Cost to Run a Lab?
Research illustration Microscope
Dreams Deferred
How Trump’s Cuts to Science Funding Are Derailing Young Scholars’ Careers

From The Review

Vector illustration of a suited man with a pair of scissors for a tie and an American flag button on his lapel.
The Review | Opinion
A Damaging Endowment Tax Crosses the Finish Line
By Phillip Levine
University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky
Photo-based illustration depicting a close-up image of a mouth of a young woman with the letter A over the lips and grades in the background
The Review | Opinion
When Students Want You to Change Their Grades
By James K. Beggan

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin