Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Backgrounder

Secret Meetings and Aliases in a Presidential Search Rekindle Debate About Openness

By Michael Vasquez August 8, 2017
W. Kent Fuchs was chosen as president of the U. of Florida five days after he officially became a candidate for the post.
W. Kent Fuchs was chosen as president of the U. of Florida five days after he officially became a candidate for the post.Doug Finger / The Gainesville Sun, via AP Images

Weeks before his name publicly surfaced as an applicant for the president’s job, W. Kent Fuchs attended multiple private meetings with members of the University of Florida’s presidential search committee, according to newly released university records.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

W. Kent Fuchs was chosen as president of the U. of Florida five days after he officially became a candidate for the post.
W. Kent Fuchs was chosen as president of the U. of Florida five days after he officially became a candidate for the post.Doug Finger / The Gainesville Sun, via AP Images

Weeks before his name publicly surfaced as an applicant for the president’s job, W. Kent Fuchs attended multiple private meetings with members of the University of Florida’s presidential search committee, according to newly released university records.

The documents, obtained by The Chronicle through a records request, show how far a public university will go to keep presidential candidates a secret: One of Mr. Fuchs’ hotel stays was booked under a different name, “Kent Peterson.” Other times, Mr. Fuchs was identified in travel itineraries by only his initials, KF.

Trustees say keeping candidates’ names secret helps them attract a broader pool of applicants. But critics argue that more openness is needed. In some states, it’s the law.

The sit-down talks with Mr. Fuchs were booked at Orlando’s Ritz-Carlton and Waldorf Astoria hotels — more than 100 miles from the Gainesville campus — with some presidential-search-committee members staying overnight. The meetings weren’t advertised to the public, and the conference room was reserved under a code name, “Alpha One.”

The newly released records have rekindled debate over the secrecy that hovers over many searches for public-college presidents. Professional search firms and college trustees have defended keeping certain details, especially applicants’ names, out of public view, as a way to encourage a broader pool of applicants.

But faculty and open-government advocates are repeatedly pushing back — arguing that a greater level of transparency is needed. In some states, it’s legally required.

In March, two professors at Fairmont State University, in West Virginia, filed a lawsuit against the university’s Board of Governors, alleging the board had violated the state’s Open Meeting Act by deciding presidential-search details such as candidate requirements and the process timeline in closed meetings. For months, according to news reports, the university’s search was conducted in secret.

Elsewhere, a retired University of Iowa professor filed a lawsuit in April against his former employer, alleging its presidential search violated open meetings laws when 23 committee members met outside the state and held closed meetings during the search that led to the hiring of J. Bruce Harreld two years ago.

In Florida, the state’s “Sunshine Law” requires presidential searches at public universities to be transparent and accessible to the public. When Mr. Fuchs was hired as the university’s 12th president, in October of 2014, trustees voted without discussion, and there was no public comment, according to media reports.

Trustees voted to hire Mr. Fuchs only five days after he formally applied, and two days after he was made a finalist.

ADVERTISEMENT

Huntley Johnson, a Gainesville attorney who has feuded with the University of Florida over its handling of sexual-assault investigations and other issues, is considering a legal challenge to Mr. Fuchs’s hiring on the grounds that it violated the Sunshine Law. If such a lawsuit were successful, it could potentially void the university’s decision to make Mr. Fuchs president.

Janine Sikes, a spokeswoman for the University of Florida, stressed that the president was unanimously approved by both the university Board of Trustees and the Florida Board of Governors. She said that the university had worked to make sure its search was conducted in full compliance with the law, and that it “will not speculate” on the possibility of Mr. Johnson’s filing a lawsuit.

The university declined to make Mr. Fuchs, who was provost at Cornell University when he was applying for the Florida job, available for an interview.

Asked about the 2014 hotel booking for “Kent Peterson,” Ms. Sikes said Mr. Fuchs was not aware that a hotel room had been reserved for him under an alias. Ms. Sikes said the Orlando meetings were not publicly advertised because the committee members who attended met with job candidates on a one-on-one basis. She also stressed that, at the time of the meetings, Mr. Fuchs was not formally an applicant for the president’s post.

ADVERTISEMENT

“None of these individual meetings were with people who had officially applied for the position,” Ms. Sikes said. The purpose of the meetings, she said, was “to talk about the University of Florida and encourage individuals to apply.”

None of these individual meetings were with people who had officially applied for the position.

University of Florida records show that Melissa Orth, senior director for government relations, booked the hotel rooms and chartered flights that allowed some search-committee members to have a preliminary sit-down with Mr. Fuchs and at least one other presidential candidate. Frequently, Ms. Orth reached out to hotels and charter operators from her personal Hotmail email address, and in one email exchange she specifically instructed a hotel to contact her through that account.

“Please send information to this email NOT to the other,” Ms. Orth wrote. Ms. Orth did not respond to a phone message seeking comment.

‘Raises Red Flags’

Public universities across the country have long complained that open-government laws are a hindrance to recruiting the best candidates for top leadership jobs. The risk for applicants is that their name will leak out to the media and cause complications with their current employer.

ADVERTISEMENT

Barbara Petersen, president of Florida’s First Amendment Foundation, countered that transparency is essential, given the importance of a position like college president and the fact that tax dollars support higher education.

Florida’s open-records laws are among the strongest in the nation, and the information gathered by university search committees, including individual applications, is considered public record. All meetings associated with the search process, including vetting of applicants, are also supposed to be open to the public.

Ms. Petersen, who has provided Sunshine Law legal training to both government officials and news reporters, said the University of Florida’s conduct “raises red flags,” even if Mr. Fuchs only met with one committee member at a time.

“These sort of one-on-one, rapid-fire meetings have been found by the courts to be a violation of Sunshine,” Ms. Petersen said. “The whole purpose of the Sunshine Law is to allow the opportunity for oversight, and to hold our government accountable.”

These sort of one-on-one, rapid-fire meetings have been found by the courts to be a violation of Sunshine.

Not all members of the 18-person search committee traveled to Orlando to meet with Mr. Fuchs, but most of them did. Records show that at least 13 committee members were scheduled to meet with him there, though not all on the same day. Some university trustees and high-ranking university administrators also traveled to Orlando to meet with Mr. Fuchs.

ADVERTISEMENT

Echoing the university’s official position, a member of the presidential search committee told The Chronicle that, because the meetings were one-on-one, everything was legal.

“No group meetings were allowed, and I certainly never participated in one,” said Keith T. Koenig, a presidential search-committee member who said he met with Mr. Fuchs for between 30 minutes and an hour on September 28, 2014, and came away “very impressed.

“I don’t understand why you’re worried about this, what’s the issue?” Mr. Koenig said, adding that the university’s legal staff had been “very careful” about not violating any rules.

Records show that Jamie Keith, who was then the university’s general counsel, was deeply involved in the presidential search. Ms. Keith signed off on travel and other search expenses, guided the scheduling of sit-down interviews with job candidates, and ate dinner with members of the search committee and representatives from the search firm hired by the university.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ms. Keith, who declined to comment for this story, stepped down in May amid allegations she illegally altered employee surveys that were critical of her job performance. Ms. Keith has denied making any changes to the surveys, which are public records. An internal university investigation into the matter is expected to be completed soon.

Statehouse Debates

The debate over transparency in presidential searches continues to play out in statehouses around the country. Florida lawmakers this year considered creating a public-records exemption for candidates for university president, vice president, provost, and dean. The measure, which also would have allowed search-committee meetings to be private until a group of finalists was announced, passed overwhelmingly in the Florida House, but died in the Senate.

Lawmakers who supported the measure complained that Florida’s disclosure requirements put the job security of applicants at risk and create a “chilling effect” that reduces the number of people who apply.

“The majority [of states] don’t have this Sunshine rule, requiring all applicants — even those that are not qualified — to be announced to the public,” State Rep. Bob Rommel, a Republican and the bill’s sponsor, told The Miami Herald. “When we’re competing for our universities, we need to make sure everybody possible that has talent applies here. We can’t let fear be a deterrent to come to Florida.”

When we’re competing for our universities, we need to make sure everybody possible that has talent applies here.

One of the few House members who opposed the bill was State Rep. Joseph Geller, a Democrat. Mr. Geller has served as the city attorney for several South Florida municipalities, and is well-versed in the Sunshine Law’s requirements. Asked about the private meetings that the University of Florida held with Mr. Fuchs, Mr. Geller said such meetings aren’t necessarily illegal.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The real question is, Did any of the trustees have any conversations with each other after they’d met him?” Mr. Geller asked.

University records show a dinner reservation for two members of the presidential search committee, Jack M. Payne and David S. Guzick, on the night before one of the meetings with Mr. Fuchs. The reservation says it was for a “party of 4,” but it is unclear who the other two attendees were.

Reached by phone, Mr. Guzick, who is the university’s senior vice president for health affairs, said he couldn’t remember who else attended the meeting. Mr. Payne, who is the senior vice president for agriculture and natural resources, did not return a phone message, but Ms. Sikes, the university spokeswoman, said Mr. Payne “said he absolutely did not have dinner with David Guzick in Orlando.”

More broadly, Ms. Sikes said the university’s presidential search included plenty of chances for the public to weigh in. The university requested feedback, she said, “regularly through the website and by email to some 245,000 people” and held “at least nine publicly noticed meetings” between May and October of 2014.

ADVERTISEMENT

The ninth meeting, a Board of Trustees meeting held on October 15, included the vote to hire Mr. Fuchs. The Tampa Bay Times reported at the time that “there was no opportunity for public comment during the meeting.” Ms. Sikes disputed that version of events, writing in an email that every board meeting “provides time for public comment, if requested.”

There is a catch, however: the request must be made three business days in advance, which in this case would have been one day before the public knew that Mr. Fuchs was a finalist for the job.

Michael Vasquez is a senior investigative reporter. Follow him on Twitter @MrMikeVasquez, or email him at michael.vasquez@chronicle.com.

A version of this article appeared in the September 1, 2017, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Leadership & Governance
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Vasquez_Michael.jpg
About the Author
Michael Vasquez
Michael Vasquez is a senior investigative reporter for The Chronicle. Before joining The Chronicle, he led a team of reporters as education editor for Politico, where he spearheaded the team’s 2016 Campaign coverage of education issues. Mr. Vasquez began his reporting career at the Miami Herald, where he worked for 14 years, covering both politics and education.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

College Headhunters, Accustomed to Secrecy, Find Themselves Under Scrutiny
The Role of Confidentiality in Presidential Searches
Too Much Sunshine Can Complicate Presidential Searches

More News

Protesters attend a demonstration in support of Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil, March 10, 2025, in New York.
First Amendment Rights
Noncitizen Professors Testify About Chilling Effect of Others’ Detentions
Photo-based illustration of a rock preciously suspended by a rope over three beakers.
Broken Promise
U.S. Policy Made America’s Research Engine the Envy of the World. One President Could End That.
Wednesday, June 11, 2025 Tucson, Arizona—Doctor Andrew Capaldi poses for a portrait at his lab at the University of Arizona in Tucson, Arizona on Wednesday, June 11, 2025. CREDIT: Ash Ponders for Chronicle
Capaldi Lab—
Research Expenses
What Does It Cost to Run a Lab?
Research illustration Microscope
Dreams Deferred
How Trump’s Cuts to Science Funding Are Derailing Young Scholars’ Careers

From The Review

University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky
Photo-based illustration depicting a close-up image of a mouth of a young woman with the letter A over the lips and grades in the background
The Review | Opinion
When Students Want You to Change Their Grades
By James K. Beggan
Photo-based illustration of a student and a professor, each occupying a red circle in a landscape of scribbles.
The Review | Opinion
Meet Students Where They Are? Maybe Not.
By Mark Horowitz

Upcoming Events

Chronfest25_Virtual-Events_Page_862x574.png
Chronicle Festival: Innovation Amid Uncertainty
07-16-Advising-InsideTrack - forum assets v1_Plain.png
The Evolving Work of College Advising
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin