Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
News

Senators Mull Changes in 90/10 Rule to Rein In For-Profits

By Kelly Field March 2, 2011
Washington

Eight months after Sen. Tom Harkin, Democrat of Iowa, began his much-publicized crackdown on for-profit colleges, key senators appear to be coalescing around a plan to limit the amount of federal money flowing to the sector.

Their solution, for-profits and their critics say, would be to count military aid in the federal share of the 90/10 rule, which requires for-profit colleges to receive 10 percent of their revenue from nonfederal sources to be eligible to receive federal student aid. Many of the colleges would fail that test if they had to count military aid as federal money.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Eight months after Sen. Tom Harkin, Democrat of Iowa, began his much-publicized crackdown on for-profit colleges, key senators appear to be coalescing around a plan to limit the amount of federal money flowing to the sector.

Their solution, for-profits and their critics say, would be to count military aid in the federal share of the 90/10 rule, which requires for-profit colleges to receive 10 percent of their revenue from nonfederal sources to be eligible to receive federal student aid. Many of the colleges would fail that test if they had to count military aid as federal money.

Lawmakers have been building a case for changing the formula for months, sending letters and issuing reports that raise concerns about the growing share of military money going to the for-profit sector, and the questionable recruiting tactics of some of its institutions.

On Wednesday, Sen. Thomas R. Carper, Democrat of Delaware, held a hearing on a report by the Government Accountability Office that found gaps in the Defense Department’s oversight of its tuition-assistance program for active-duty veterans. While the report did not single out any institutions for criticism, it described a few examples of “improper or questionable marketing practices” by for-profit colleges.

In an interview after the hearing, Mr. Carper said he had been “surprised” to learn that military tuition assistance isn’t counted as federal aid in the 90/10 calculation. Asked if he supported including it, he said it was “something we should consider.”

“I’m a big advocate of skin in the game,” he said. “There has to be skin in the game for markets to work.”

Senator Harkin, who has held three hearings on for-profits, has also expressed interest in expanding the categories of funds counted as federal money in the 90/10 rule. But the idea is certain to run into opposition in the Republican-led House of Representatives, where many lawmakers favor softening the formula. One possible compromise would be to include military and veterans benefits in the federal share, but allow a larger share of colleges’ revenue to come from the federal government.

Without such relief, many for-profits would cross the 90-percent threshold and become ineligible to receive federal student aid. Hundreds of colleges are already dangerously close to the cutoff, with 257 institutions receiving more than 85 percent of their revenue from federal student aid, according to the Education Department’s latest figures.

This wouldn’t be the first time the 90/10 rule has been used to cleanse the sector of its “bad actors.” Congress created the rule in the 1992 reauthorization of the Higher Education Act to crack down on fly-by-night institutions that had been set up to reap profits from the student-aid programs. The rationale behind the rule was simple: If a program is worthwhile, a for-profit college should be able to derive at least 10 percent of its revenue from students willing to spend their own money on it.

For-profit colleges have vigorously fought the rule, saying it penalizes colleges for educating low-income students and drives up tuition. Congress has softened the rule several times but has refused to do away with it altogether.

ADVERTISEMENT

To stay in compliance with the rule, for-profit colleges have aggressively recruited veterans and service members with Defense Department and GI Bill benefits. Twenty for-profit companies received a combined $521.1-million in veterans and Defense Department benefits in 2010, according to a recent report by the Senate education committee. The sector as a whole has received more than a third of the benefits paid out under the new GI Bill, even though it enrolls only 10 percent of all students.

Nonprofit colleges have also courted veterans, eager for their benefits. In 2009, a task force in Senator Harkin’s home state developed a strategy for increasing veteran enrollment at the University of Iowa. Its report concluded that adding 100 veterans a year would result in an additional $800,000 in tuition income annually and a potential $2-million in revenue for Iowa City.

Still, it is for-profit colleges that have taken the heat over recruiting practices. On Wednesday, the Veterans Affairs Department announced that it had withdrawn education benefits from three Westwood College campuses in Texas because of misleading advertising and enrollment practices.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Law & Policy
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Kelly Field
Kelly Field joined The Chronicle of Higher Education in 2004 and covered federal higher-education policy. She continues to write for The Chronicle on a freelance basis.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Vector illustration of large open scissors  with several workers in seats dangling by white lines
Iced Out
The Death of Shared Governance
Illustration showing money being funnelled into the top of a microscope.
'A New Era'
Higher-Ed Associations Pitch an Alternative to Trump’s Cap on Research Funding
Illustration showing classical columns of various heights, each turning into a stack of coins
Endowment funds
The Nation’s Wealthiest Small Colleges Just Won a Big Tax Exemption
WASHINGTON, DISTICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES - 2025/04/14: A Pro-Palestinian demonstrator holding a sign with Release Mahmud Khalil written on it, stands in front of the ICE building while joining in a protest. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators rally in front of the ICE building, demanding freedom for Mahmoud Khalil and all those targeted for speaking out against genocide in Palestine. Protesters demand an end to U.S. complicity and solidarity with the resistance in Gaza. (Photo by Probal Rashid/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
An Anonymous Group’s List of Purported Critics of Israel Helped Steer a U.S. Crackdown on Student Activists

From The Review

Illustration of an ocean tide shaped like Donald Trump about to wash away sandcastles shaped like a college campus.
The Review | Essay
Why Universities Are So Powerless in Their Fight Against Trump
By Jason Owen-Smith
Photo-based illustration of a closeup of a pencil meshed with a circuit bosrd
The Review | Essay
How Are Students Really Using AI?
By Derek O'Connell
John T. Scopes as he stood before the judges stand and was sentenced, July 2025.
The Review | Essay
100 Years Ago, the Scopes Monkey Trial Discovered Academic Freedom
By John K. Wilson

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin