> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • Student-Success Resource Center
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
Faculty
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Smooth Lectures Foster Only the Illusion of Learning, Study Finds

By  Dan Berrett
June 10, 2013
In an experiment, students heard the same lecture—on why calico cats tend to be female—from two instructors, one fluent and engaging, the other halting and stiff. Unexpectedly, both groups of students scored equally well on a test of the material, even though the students with the better lecturer thought they’d learned more.
istockphoto
In an experiment, students heard the same lecture—on why calico cats tend to be female—from two instructors, one fluent and engaging, the other halting and stiff. Unexpectedly, both groups of students scored equally well on a test of the material, even though the students with the better lecturer thought they’d learned more.

Logic would suggest that lecturing to students in a clear, fluid style while making frequent eye contact would engage students and aid in their learning. At the very least, many people would assume, that technique would be more effective than hunching over a podium, reading from notes, and barely pausing to look up.

But that may not always be the case, according to a study published last month in the Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

Students who watched a lecture delivered in the clear and fluid style, which is described in a report on the study as “fluent,” were about twice as likely as those who watched the haltingly delivered, “disfluent” one to believe that they would remember the material they had just learned.

We're sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network.

Please allow access to our site, and then refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, please contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

Logic would suggest that lecturing to students in a clear, fluid style while making frequent eye contact would engage students and aid in their learning. At the very least, many people would assume, that technique would be more effective than hunching over a podium, reading from notes, and barely pausing to look up.

But that may not always be the case, according to a study published last month in the Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

Students who watched a lecture delivered in the clear and fluid style, which is described in a report on the study as “fluent,” were about twice as likely as those who watched the haltingly delivered, “disfluent” one to believe that they would remember the material they had just learned.

But both groups actually remembered about the same amount, with the students who had watched the disfluent lecture more accurately predicting how well they recalled the material.

“What students perceive as very effective is not always as effective as they think it is,” said Shana K. Carpenter, an assistant professor of psychology at Iowa State University, and lead author of the study, “Appearances Can Be Deceiving,” which is subtitled “instructor fluency increases perceptions of learning without increasing actual learning.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Lecturer as Catalyst

Ms. Carpenter and her fellow researchers conducted two experiments to arrive at their findings. In the first, 42 undergraduates in an introductory psychology course at Iowa State were randomly assigned to two groups. Each was told their memory would be tested later. They watched a 65-second video of a lecturer explaining why calico cats are usually female. Participants who had extensive prior knowledge of the subject were removed from the study.

One group watched the fluent video, in which the speaker stood in front of a desk, spoke without notes, maintained eye contact with the camera, and gestured with her hands for emphasis.

The other students watched the disfluent one. The same lecturer stood behind a desk and delivered identical content, but read haltingly from notes as she hunched over a podium, pausing occasionally to glance at the camera.

After watching the videos, the students in both groups were asked how well they thought they had learned the material, how much they predicted they would remember 10 minutes later, and how organized, effective, and knowledgeable the speaker was.

Both groups spent about 10 minutes answering 30 trivia questions on unrelated topics. Then they had five minutes to explain, in writing, why calico cats are female.

ADVERTISEMENT

The students who had watched the fluent lecture were about twice as likely as those who had watched the disfluent one to predict that they would remember what they had heard and to say they had learned the material. The fluent speaker was also rated as significantly more organized, knowledgeable, and effective than the disfluent speaker.

The scores on the test, however, revealed that the students who had viewed the fluent speaker were overconfident: Students in the two groups performed equally well on the test, getting about 25 percent of the material correct.

“What is clear,” Ms. Carpenter and her fellow authors wrote, “is that a more-fluent instructor may increase perceptions of learning without increasing actual learning.”

The implication, they continued, is that students may conflate how well their instructor seems to know the material with how well they themselves do. “The question students should ask themselves is not whether it seemed clear when someone else explained it,” they wrote. “The question is, ‘Can I explain it clearly?’”

‘Troubling Implications’

In the second experiment, 70 other students were divided into two groups, shown the same video lectures, given the same trivia questions, and asked to explain the reasons that calico cats are female. But this time, after the lectures, the students could read a one-page script of the speaker’s remarks, and could take as much time as they wished.

ADVERTISEMENT

The two groups of students in the second experiment spent about the same amount of time, approximately one and a half minutes, reading the script, and they scored about the same on the test.

Another wrinkle emerged. If the students who had watched the disfluent lecture chose to spend a longer-than-average time reading the script, their scores improved, while the same could not be said of students who had read the script after watching the fluent one.

“To be honest, we’re not really sure what that means,” Ms. Carpenter said. It could be, she added, that the students who watched the less-engaging lecture had read the script more attentively. “They’re approaching it from a more-realistic perception perhaps,” she said.

The study’s results comport with a growing body of literature on the disconnection between what people think they have learned and what they actually did learn, Daniel M. Oppenheimer, an associate professor of marketing and psychology at the University of California at Los Angeles, said in an e-mail.

Intuition is not always accurate, added Mr. Oppenheimer, who has studied fluency and memory. “This has troubling implications for the usefulness of teaching evaluations and other common measures of teaching and course quality.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Ms. Carpenter cautioned that her results should not be interpreted to mean that lecture style is unimportant, or that bad lectures are acceptable. Instructors who teach in a fluent manner may also be more likely to organize their classes well and be attentive to students’ questions, which would help students learn.

“I’d like to think,” she said, “that there are things that instructors do that influence learning.”

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Teaching & Learning
Dan Berrett
Dan Berrett is a senior editor for The Chronicle of Higher Education. He joined The Chronicle in 2011 as a reporter covering teaching and learning. Follow him on Twitter @danberrett, or write to him at dan.berrett@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Accessibility Statement
    Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin