Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Student Housing
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Students

So Much Data, So Little Guidance

By Beckie Supiano January 27, 2014
College Possible is one group that trains recent college graduates, like Mainong Yang (right), 
to guide high-school students through the college-admissions process.
College Possible is one group that trains recent college graduates, like Mainong Yang (right), 
to guide high-school students through the college-admissions process.Courtney Perry for The Chronicle

Going to college generally pays off. But not all colleges are the same, and not all students end up at places where they’re likely to fare well.

Dropping out or overborrowing—or both—are widely recognized problems. To try to prevent them, the federal government has unveiled a bunch of new tools to give prospective students more information. College Navigator offers a trove of searchable data. The College Scorecard features comparative performance measures. The Shopping Sheet is a standardized financial-aid award format.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Going to college generally pays off. But not all colleges are the same, and not all students end up at places where they’re likely to fare well.

Dropping out or overborrowing—or both—are widely recognized problems. To try to prevent them, the federal government has unveiled a bunch of new tools to give prospective students more information. College Navigator offers a trove of searchable data. The College Scorecard features comparative performance measures. The Shopping Sheet is a standardized financial-aid award format.

In August, President Obama announced plans to develop a college-ratings system. Yes, more consumer information. But it could go further, if Congress, as the administration hopes, ties the ratings to financial aid.

The plan has proved unpopular with college leaders, who seem more comfortable with information itself, sans value judgment. As one president wrote in The New York Times, “The administration should make many types of data easily available and let people rate schools for themselves.”

Several existing tools, the ratings plan, and the do-it-yourself counterproposal all boil down to disclosure. But is more consumer information enough to steer students toward better choices?

It’s tempting for the government and colleges to think so. Requiring disclosure is among the cheaper policy options, and higher education, like any industry, would probably prefer it to other kinds of regulation. It’s much less taxing to tell consumers about shortcomings than it is to fix them.

Providing information is one of three traditional approaches—along with incentives and education—to change behavior, says Katie Martin, managing director of ideas42, a nonprofit group “using behavioral economics to do good.” But those approaches don’t necessarily work.

Giving people more information, for instance, won’t always change what they do. That’s because despite hard facts, people’s decisions can work against their own interests, Ms. Martin says. Present bias leads people to choose short-term satisfaction over long-term goals. Inattention means they can focus on only so many things at once, especially if they’re short on time or money.

Besides, consumers know less than experts might think. College presidents and most of the people they talk with use higher-ed jargon. They get what net prices, cohort-default rates, and six-year graduation rates mean. Prospective students may not. Yet those terms appear all the time in material geared toward them.

“We unconsciously use a lot of inside-baseball terminology,” says Ben Castleman, an assistant professor of education and public policy at the University of Virginia. One of the recently announced updates to the federal government’s financial-aid Shopping Sheet is a glossary.

ADVERTISEMENT

In other industries, when disclosure has worked, it was often because it altered the actions not of consumers, but of the industry itself.

That’s what happened when the European Union started requiring labels for the sale of home appliances, specifying their energy efficiency. Even before the information shifted demand, manufacturers began offering more-efficient products, according to a forthcoming paper in Annual Review of Economics, by George Loewenstein, Cass R. Sunstein, and Russell Golman. Maybe the companies overestimated consumer response—or maybe they were embarrassed selling poorly rated appliances.

In higher education, disclosure requirements like net-price calculators, which colleges must now post on their websites, and tuition watch lists, which call out colleges with high prices or big increases, haven’t resulted in major shifts in industry behavior. A ratings system might, but not necessarily in the desired direction.

College presidents’ criticism of the plan centers on its potential to create perverse incentives. Let’s say colleges are embarrassed by their graduation rates and want to improve them. They might provide better support to students to help them through. Or they might decide not to take a chance on those who aren’t clearly cut out for college success.

What Matters Is Guidance

Swaying consumers is another matter. That’s because “the problem is not really lack of information,” says Mr. Loewenstein, a professor of economics and psychology at Carnegie Mellon University. “The problem is that people don’t know how to use it.”

ADVERTISEMENT

A recent study by the Art & Science Group, a higher-education consulting firm, suggests as much. The study, commissioned by the College Board, compared SAT takers in the bottom half of the family-income distribution with those in the top half. Both groups of students had similar college aspirations, but based on historical patterns, those in the bottom half end up enrolling at considerably lower rates.

Both groups reported similar access to information—from colleges, for instance, and from search sites. In fact, the less-well-off students said they relied on that information more heavily than their higher-income peers said they did. The difference, the researchers concluded, was students’ ability to process and make use of the information.

So what would help all students make good college choices? Behavioral-economics research says information has the greatest shot at changing behavior when it is simple, standardized, salient, and available at key moments.

Even if it meets those criteria, however, information doesn’t always have the intended effect, says Lindsay C. Page, a research assistant professor of education at the University of Pittsburgh.

ADVERTISEMENT

For example, two pieces of information the government wants prospective students to consider are net price and graduation rate. The price figure, a dollar amount that would have to be paid in short order, probably resonates, Ms. Page says. Graduation rate, maybe not. Graduation, after all, is years away, and people are optimistic: Confronted with long odds, they expect to beat them. So looking at both data points, a prospective student might consider the price and disregard the graduation rate. That’s probably not what the government is going for.

Improving the design and delivery of information could help, but only so much. After all, some high-school students are in constant touch with adults who understand the college process, can help interpret information, and will advocate for them. Others may not know anyone like that.

“If the administration really wanted to have an impact on getting people to make better college choices,” Mr. Loewenstein says, “they would put resources into guidance.”

That could take a number of forms: How to choose a college woven into the high-school curriculum. A federal plan to reverse the shortage of guidance counselors. Scaled-up models of the College Advising Corps or College Possible, two groups that train recent college graduates to guide high schoolers through the admissions process.

None of those ideas are as easy or as cheap as giving prospective students another website or piece of paper. But they might do a lot more to close the real gap between more- and less-advantaged students: not in information, but in help using it.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Supiano_Beckie.jpg
About the Author
Beckie Supiano
Beckie Supiano is a senior writer for The Chronicle of Higher Education, where she covers teaching, learning, and the human interactions that shape them. She is also a co-author of The Chronicle’s free, weekly Teaching newsletter that focuses on what works in and around the classroom. Email her at beckie.supiano@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Susie West and Dianne Davis-Keening, U of M Extension SuperShelf coordinators.
A 'Connector' Severed
Congress Cut a Federal Nutrition Program, Jeopardizing Campus Jobs and Community Services
PPP 10 FINAL promo.jpg
Bouncing Back?
For Once, Public Confidence in Higher Ed Has Increased
University of California, Berkeley chancellor Dr. Rich Lyons, testifies at a Congressional hearing on antisemitism, in Washington, D.C., U.S., on July 15, 2025. It is the latest in a series of House hearings on antisemitism at the university level, one that critics claim is a convenient way for Republicans to punish universities they consider too liberal or progressive, thereby undermining responses to hate speech and hate crimes. (Photo by Allison Bailey/NurPhoto via AP)
Another Congressional Hearing
3 College Presidents Went to Congress. Here’s What They Talked About.
Tufts University student from Turkey, Rumeysa Ozturk, who was arrested by immigration agents while walking along a street in a Boston suburb, talks to reporters on arriving back in Boston, Saturday, May 10, 2025, a day after she was released from a Louisiana immigration detention center on the orders of a federal judge. (AP Photo/Rodrique Ngowi)
Law & Policy
Homeland Security Agents Detail Run-Up to High-Profile Arrests of Pro-Palestinian Scholars

From The Review

Photo-based illustration with repeated images of a student walking, in the pattern of a graph trending down, then up.
The Review | Opinion
7 Ways Community Colleges Can Boost Enrollment
By Bob Levey
Illustration of an ocean tide shaped like Donald Trump about to wash away sandcastles shaped like a college campus.
The Review | Essay
Why Universities Are So Powerless in Their Fight Against Trump
By Jason Owen-Smith
Photo-based illustration of a closeup of a pencil meshed with a circuit bosrd
The Review | Essay
How Are Students Really Using AI?
By Derek O'Connell

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin