> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • Student-Success Resource Center
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
Reaction and Analysis
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Spanier’s Conviction Highlights Lessons of Sandusky Scandal

By  Eric Kelderman
March 24, 2017

The verdict in Graham Spanier’s trial brought with it fresh reminders of the Penn State child-molestation scandal, but it also offered higher-education officials a chance to reflect on what might be learned from how the university handled the problem.
Gene J. Puskar, AP Images
The verdict in Graham Spanier’s trial brought with it fresh reminders of the Penn State child-molestation scandal, but it also offered higher-education officials a chance to reflect on what might be learned from how the university handled the problem.

The guilty verdict in the trial of Graham B. Spanier marked a milestone in the long-running tale of misery at Pennsylvania State University. Mr. Spanier served as president of the university for 16 years, until revelations of child sexual abuse involving the former football coach Jerry Sandusky blew up his career and dealt a powerful blow to the institution’s reputation.

Paterno Statue-Carousel
Penn State Scandal
This selection of articles from The Chronicle’s archives looks back on the Jerry Sandusky scandal and its fallout at Pennsylvania State University.
  • With Last-Minute Ruling, Graham Spanier Evades Jumpsuit and ‘Hard Cell’
  • Seeking Closure in Verdict, Penn State Finds More Discord
  • Guilty Verdict Puts a Dark Coda on Spanier’s Fall

A Pennsylvania jury on Friday found Mr. Spanier guilty on one misdemeanor count of child endangerment, while finding him not guilty on another count of endangerment and a count of criminal conspiracy. Though the verdict brought with it fresh reminders of the scandal and threatened to reopen old wounds, it also offered higher-education officials across the country a chance to reflect on how Penn State handled its problems and what others might learn from that.

We're sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network.

Please allow access to our site, and then refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, please contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

The verdict in Graham Spanier’s trial brought with it fresh reminders of the Penn State child-molestation scandal, but it also offered higher-education officials a chance to reflect on what might be learned from how the university handled the problem.
Gene J. Puskar, AP Images
The verdict in Graham Spanier’s trial brought with it fresh reminders of the Penn State child-molestation scandal, but it also offered higher-education officials a chance to reflect on what might be learned from how the university handled the problem.

The guilty verdict in the trial of Graham B. Spanier marked a milestone in the long-running tale of misery at Pennsylvania State University. Mr. Spanier served as president of the university for 16 years, until revelations of child sexual abuse involving the former football coach Jerry Sandusky blew up his career and dealt a powerful blow to the institution’s reputation.

Paterno Statue-Carousel
Penn State Scandal
This selection of articles from The Chronicle’s archives looks back on the Jerry Sandusky scandal and its fallout at Pennsylvania State University.
  • Spanier Is Found Guilty of Child Endangerment in Sandusky Sex-Abuse Case
  • Spanier Trial Closes With Appeal to Moral Outrage
  • Remorseful, Spanier’s Lieutenants Say They Failed Children

A Pennsylvania jury on Friday found Mr. Spanier guilty on one misdemeanor count of child endangerment, while finding him not guilty on another count of endangerment and a count of criminal conspiracy. Though the verdict brought with it fresh reminders of the scandal and threatened to reopen old wounds, it also offered higher-education officials across the country a chance to reflect on how Penn State handled its problems and what others might learn from that.

“University officials will be relieved that yet another chapter in this seemingly unending crisis is closing,” said Zach Olsen, president of Infinite Global, a crisis-communications firm that works with colleges and other institutions facing legal challenges or other highly publicized controversies.

ADVERTISEMENT

The university said in a written statement that the verdict in Mr. Spanier’s trial brought some “closure” to the scandal, which has cost the university about a quarter of a billion dollars in fines, legal costs and settlements.

Looking back at the scope of the situation, higher-education experts said it was clear just how poorly Penn State officials reacted to the events as they unfolded.

“There’s no dispute that this was mishandled,” said Dan Schorr, who looks at sexual-misconduct and Title IX cases for Kroll, a risk-management and consulting company.

Until recently, Mr. Schorr said, it was not common for universities to vigorously investigate their leadership or popular figures on campus, such as football coaches. The fallout from the Penn State scandal has made it clear that not only should universities quickly undertake such investigations, but also that inquiries need to be independent from the people being investigated and not managed by the campus’s president.

Daniel H. Sharphorn, vice chancellor and general counsel for the University of Texas system, said no official at the university can be above reproach from such serious allegations.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Even a hint, however slight, remote, or incredible of such gross misconduct in one’s institution must be carefully and rigorously pursued to find the facts and reach a firm conclusion,” he said in an email.

Richard D. Legon, president of the Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges, said the Penn State situation didn’t change how he viewed the importance of good governance. Instead, he said, it reinforced the consequences of a poor relationship between the trustees and the president. Presidents need to have a trusting and transparent relationship with trustees in order to bring difficult situations to their attention, Mr. Legon said.

In addition, he said, everyone on the board needs to be well-informed; there can’t be a group of insiders who try to manage the most sensitive issues.

Erin A. Hennessy, vice president at TVP Communications, said the Penn State scandal didn’t change practices in crisis communications, but it underscored the importance of clear and honest public information from a college’s administration.

“There are real and weighty consequences both for our institutions and for our leaders when they are not truthful, accountable, and transparent,” she said in an email.

ADVERTISEMENT

That need to communicate early may conflict with the more cautious approach of the college’s lawyer, she said, but the court of public opinion won’t be waiting for the legal outcomes.

“Counsel often advises against early and open communication in order to protect the institution from vulnerabilities,” she said. But colleges “open themselves to a whole new set of vulnerabilities if they delay communication.”

Eric Kelderman writes about money and accountability in higher education, including such areas as state policy, accreditation, and legal affairs. You can find him on Twitter @etkeld, or email him at eric.kelderman@chronicle.com.

Read other items in this Penn State Scandal package.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Leadership & Governance
Eric Kelderman
Eric Kelderman covers issues of power, politics, and purse strings in higher education. You can email him at eric.kelderman@chronicle.com, or find him on Twitter @etkeld.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Accessibility Statement
    Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin