Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    A Culture of Cybersecurity
    Opportunities in the Hard Sciences
    Career Preparation
Sign In
First Person

Speed Advising?

How to apply a speed-dating model to academic advising

By Robert Booras March 18, 2015
advice booras advising

I have been an academic adviser for the past 12 years at a variety of institutions, public and private, two-year and four-year. Academic advising on those campuses varied greatly in practice and protocol, but they all shared one primary challenge: time. There was never enough of it, especially during peak advising times, to meet the needs of all students seeking guidance.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

I have been an academic adviser for the past 12 years at a variety of institutions, public and private, two-year and four-year. Academic advising on those campuses varied greatly in practice and protocol, but they all shared one primary challenge: time. There was never enough of it, especially during peak advising times, to meet the needs of all students seeking guidance.

In my first advising job, I was one of two full-time academic advisers for approximately 5,000 students. In my second job, I was one of six for roughly 18,000 students. And now, I am one of eight academic advisers for about 14,000 students.

There are many ways to offer academic advising, and many different models. I’m focusing here on in-person advising—by appointment, or on a walk-in basis. (Other models include by phone, email, or instant messaging, and in some cases, texting. Those present their own set of benefits and drawbacks.)

Lately, though, I’ve been extolling a third, alternative model: speed advising. It’s akin to speed dating (which I’ve never actually done), an organized event where you quickly meet a large number of new people via a series of short “dates,” usually lasting from three to eight minutes each.

Before I get to the benefits of this approach when applied to academic advising, let’s review the two more traditional models.

  • Appointment advising. The benefits of this model are tenfold and obvious, but it has a key drawback, too. Appointments allow advisers and students more time to review academic history and student performance, and to discuss goals and draft an academic plan. However, the crucial drawback to appointments is you can only fit so many in a day, a week, or a month. When demand for advising is high—such as preceding and during registration for a new semester—there are not enough appointments, nor hours in the day, to meet the need.
  • Walk-in advising. The allure of being able to walk in anytime to get academic guidance is reassuring to students—that is, until they have to wait an hour or two to actually meet with an adviser. To make matters worse, occasionally, after such a long wait, an advisee discovers that he could have resolved the issue remotely, or that she has to visit a different office (for example, financial aid). Also, walk-in advising sessions are infused with a sense of haste that can be disconcerting to students when they aren’t expecting to be rushed.

As for academic advisers, we tend to dread walk-in sessions. As the late-evening adviser for much of my career, I spent countless hours beyond closing time trying to meet with all of the students who had shown up. If our office hours indicated we were open until 7 p.m., the door would close at 7 p.m., yes, but there would be a room full of students still waiting for help.

At one college where I worked, I met students only by appointment, which meant many of them did not have access to timely advising. In another job, I met students only on a walk-in basis (I began seeking employment elsewhere almost immediately). Finally, luckily, I landed on a campus that combined appointment days with walk-in days, striking a nice balance. Still, the walk-in days seemed more and more a disservice to both students and advisers. Students’ agitation from the long waiting periods was palpable.

Then in the spring of 2014, my colleague, Michael Lo Porto, proposed that we try “express session” advising, the model for which was very similar to speed dating. Instead of walk-ins, this model split the advising day into 15-minute time slots. Students are required to sign up for a 15-minute slot in person, the day of. Essentially, they are booking a 15-minute, “express” appointment or “session,” for that day and that day only. That eliminates any waiting time. Students can attend class or run errands and return at their appointed time. It also clearly communicates to students that they have a 15-minute appointment. Knowing that upfront makes for a better prepared advisee and a more productive session over all.

The success of this program became wonderfully obvious after a couple weeks, and students have embraced it without pause. Our office has since eliminated all walk-in advising while still maintaining a mix of traditional appointments (30-minute sessions that can be booked in advance via email or phone).

No system is perfect, of course, and speed advising has two main drawbacks. First, evening students who arrive to the office late often find that there are no more time slots available for that day. We tried resolving that problem by waiting until 4 or 5 p.m. to allow students to sign up for 15-minute meetings that evening. Still, invariably, some students who stopped by later in the day would find no available slots.

ADVERTISEMENT

So we began to offer those students express sessions for the following evening (or the next available appointment). Gradually, over time, we were able to meet with all the evening students. That may not seem like an ideal resolution, and it’s not. But it works because it’s based on the notion that demand will recede after the peak advising period.

The other drawback: What do we do with students, and their 15 minutes, when they don’t show up for their sessions?

It’s frustrating when my time is wasted and another student’s opportunity to meet is forfeited. I’m not sure there is a real resolution or protection against that problem. My response, when students show up late, has been to prorate the time I give them for the appointment. If a student shows up eight minutes late, we meet for the remaining seven minutes. It’s important to note that 95 percent of students show up for their 15-minute sessions, and “mostly” on time.

If your office is still offering walk-in advising, I would highly recommend exploring the express model. It works best when coupled with a traditional appointment system, but speed advising can be particularly helpful during your busiest advising seasons at the beginning of a semester.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Illustration showing three classical columns on stacks of coins, at different heights due to the amount of coins stacked underneath
Data
These 35 Colleges Could Take a Financial Hit Under Republicans’ Expanded Endowment Tax
Illustration showing details of a U.S. EEOC letter to Harvard U.
Bias Allegations
Faculty Hiring Is Under Federal Scrutiny at Harvard
Illustration showing nontraditional students: a pregnant worman, a soldier; a working professional; an elderly man; and a woman with an artificial leg
'Unique Needs'
Common App Takes an In-Depth Look at Independent Students
Photo-based illustration of a Sonoma State University clock structure that's fallen into a hole in a $100 bill.
Campus Crossroads
Sonoma State U. Is Making Big Cuts to Close a Budget Hole. What Will Be Left?

From The Review

Solomon-0512 B.jpg
The Review | Essay
The Conscience of a Campus Conservative
By Daniel J. Solomon
Illustration depicting a pendulum with a red ball featuring a portion of President Trump's face to the left about to strike balls showing a group of protesters.
The Review | Opinion
Trump Is Destroying DEI With the Same Tools That Built It
By Noliwe M. Rooks
Illustration showing two men and giant books, split into two sides—one blue and one red. The two men are reaching across the center color devide to shake hands.
The Review | Opinion
Left and Right Agree: Higher Ed Needs to Change
By Michael W. Clune

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin