Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Hands-On Career Preparation
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    Alternative Pathways
Sign In
News

Spotlight on Retention

Students can’t graduate if they don’t return

By Eric Hoover March 9, 2015
Ariel Blackwell (right), a student at Middle Tennessee State, meets with her adviser, Trever Thomas. The university set aside $3-million 
to hire 47 new academic advisers, with the goal of doing a better job of engaging students.
Ariel Blackwell (right), a student at Middle Tennessee State, meets with her adviser, Trever Thomas. The university set aside $3-million 
to hire 47 new academic advisers, with the goal of doing a better job of engaging students. Joon Powell for The Chronicle

So far nobody’s patented a Retain-O-Matic, a surefire, off-the-shelf strategy for increasing the number of students who stay enrolled. Until that happens, improving your college’s graduation rate will require campuswide planning and commitment, the willingness to rethink approaches to an age-old problem.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

So far nobody’s patented a Retain-O-Matic, a surefire, off-the-shelf strategy for increasing the number of students who stay enrolled. Until that happens, improving your college’s graduation rate will require campuswide planning and commitment, the willingness to rethink approaches to an age-old problem.

Attrition is rampant. Nationally, only 58 percent of all first-time students who started a two- or four-year college in fall 2012 returned to the same institution the following year, according to the National Student Clearinghouse. And 69 percent returned to any U.S. college. That’s a ton of missed opportunities—and lost tuition revenue.

Although keeping students on track has always been a challenge, the stakes are getting higher. Demographic shifts are bringing more first-generation students, with many needs, through higher education’s gates. Tight budgets and enrollment shortfalls have stretched many campuses thin. Meanwhile, accountability measures and performance-based funding are intensifying concerns about retention rates, which haven’t budged for decades.

So colleges are adopting more-sophisticated blueprints for student success. Some are embracing big data, using predictive models to identify those who are likely to struggle. Many have beefed up advising and support services. And various campuses are redesigning key courses in hopes of getting more students to the finish line.

Trine University, in Indiana, has made customer service a priority. “This is the cellphone-service generation—if you’re not happy, switch your provider,” says Stuart D. Jones, vice president for enrollment management. “So today it’s all about meeting students’ needs and doing it quickly.”

TAKEAWAY

Retooling for the Retention Age

  • Colleges are helping academic advisers become more proactive while doing more to anticipate challenges that students may face, such as providing some first-year students with mentors.
  • Instead of concentrating only on students who are most likely to struggle, colleges are mining their data to identify those in the “murky middle,” who might benefit from extra advising.
  • Knowing your college’s retention rate is important, but knowing how many students are making progress toward degrees—and why—is essential.

To that end, Trine’s robust early-alert system allows faculty, staff, and coaches to submit online reports about a student who may need help. Maybe she’s missed two classes in a row, or she’s struggling in math, or her mother’s just been diagnosed with cancer. Each alert goes to a student-success team, which chooses the best person to contact the student, usually within 24 hours.

“We can’t solve all problems, but we don’t want students to suffer in silence,” Mr. Jones says. “That’s why a lot of universities lose students—they just aren’t aware of who’s suffering.”

By the time problems surface, it can be too late. So Trine started a mentoring program last year, based on freshmen’s academic records or financial burdens, for those who are likely to struggle. The university assigns each one to a faculty or staff member, who typically meets with the student once a week for a chat.

Mr. Jones believes the program helped nudge fall-to-spring retention up by two percentage points this year. “There’s nothing wrong with being a little intrusive in a student’s life,” he says. “They expect it.”

Middle Tennessee State University started its new Quest for Student Success initiative to complement Gov. Bill Haslam’s goal of significantly increasing the number of Tennesseans with college credentials by 2025. The university set aside $3-million to hire 47 new academic advisers, more than doubling their number. Their charge: to engage students more proactively and efficiently.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Old-school advising is about who appears in front of you—it’s very limited,” says Richard D. Sluder, vice provost for student success. “New-school advising is using predictive analytics to target a specific group.”

How? Software from the Education Advisory Board, a research, technology, and consulting company, has helped the university identify students who are likely to hit a snag. The system is built on the finding that grades in specific courses, which vary from campus to campus, have great value in predicting who will graduate. (At Middle Tennessee State, for instance, 10 years’ worth of historical data revealed that 78 percent of those who got an A in History 2020 later graduated, compared with just 60 percent of those who got a C.)

Such insights are helping advisers pick out students in the “murky middle,” with grade-point averages between 2.0 and 3.0, whose overall performance had not raised any red flags. The university then runs “campaigns,” selecting groups of students and directing them to more-focused advising sessions. Middle Tennessee State has also used the data to guide the redesign of its 10 most-predictive courses.

As of late February, fall-to-spring persistence rates are up 2.2 percentage points over last year for freshmen, 4.5 points for transfers, and 1 point for graduate students. That adds up to 459 students, Mr. Sluder says: “We’re growing enrollment on the back of retention.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Amid all the discussions of student success, it’s important to remember that a retention rate reveals only so much. DePaul University confronted that fact about 10 years ago after reaching an important conclusion. “A focus on persistence was blinding us to the importance of degree completion,” says David H. Kalsbeek, senior vice president for enrollment management and marketing.

The percentage of students who return for a second year has long been the standard metric by which colleges measure their success. Yet when DePaul officials analyzed their enrollment data, they found that while about four-fifths of incoming students were returning as sophomores the following fall, only about half were earning at least a 2.5 grade-point average and 48 credits (on a quarter system).

Because students who meet those academic thresholds are much more likely to graduate from DePaul than those who don’t, Mr. Kalsbeek says retention rates were “masking” the main determinant of their long-term success. So the university redefined its goals, emphasizing progress-toward-degree as a key metric. It also revamped its strategies to better serve the needs of all students, not just those most likely to struggle.

In recent years, DePaul has pushed faculty members and advisers to emphasize the importance of first-year performance. The university created a degree-audit system that allows students to track their own progress. It has redesigned gateway courses in accounting, chemistry, and math, and urged faculty members to give early assignments—and feedback. And it promotes summer sessions as a way to avoid scheduling jams, retake a course, or tackle an especially challenging subject. Its four-year completion rate has increased to nearly 60 percent, up from about 40 percent in 2000.

ADVERTISEMENT

In short, retention is not the same as progress toward a degree. Also, many students who drop out do so after their second year.

No matter what a college does, its retention and completion rates are unlikely to increase sharply over the short term. After all, research shows that a college’s defining features—its socioeconomic diversity and market position—largely determine a range of student outcomes.

It’s crucial to set a realistic goal for your institution, Mr. Kalsbeek says. Trustees might ask why your completion rate can’t be as high as that of the nearest superselective college, but such a comparison might set unrealistic expectations.

“There’s a fine line,” he says, “between having a vision and hallucinating.”

View: The Full Trends Report

Chronicle subscribers get access to the full Trends Report. Not yet a subscriber? Sign up here.

Read other items in The Trends Report: 10 Key Shifts in Higher Education.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
First-Generation Students
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Eric Hoover
About the Author
Eric Hoover
Eric Hoover writes about the challenges of getting to, and through, college. Follow him on Twitter @erichoov, or email him, at eric.hoover@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Marva Johnson is set to take the helm of Florida A&M University this summer.
Leadership & governance
‘Surprising': A DeSantis-Backed Lobbyist Is Tapped to Lead Florida A&M
Students and community members protest outside of Coffman Memorial Union at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis, on Tuesday, April 23, 2024.
Campus Activism
One Year After the Encampments, Campuses Are Quieter and Quicker to Stop Protests
Hoover-NBERValue-0516 002 B
Diminishing Returns
Why the College Premium Is Shrinking for Low-Income Students
Harvard University
'Deeply Unsettling'
Harvard’s Battle With Trump Escalates as Research Money Is Suddenly Canceled

From The Review

Illustration showing a valedictorian speaker who's tassel is a vintage microphone
The Review | Opinion
A Graduation Speaker Gets Canceled
By Corey Robin
Illustration showing a stack of coins and a university building falling over
The Review | Opinion
Here’s What Congress’s Endowment-Tax Plan Might Cost Your College
By Phillip Levine
Photo-based illustration of a college building under an upside down baby crib
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Must Stop Infantilizing Everyone
By Gregory Conti

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin