Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Trump Webinar Series
    Mental Health Forum
    Using Big Data to Improve Social Mobility
Sign In
News

Spreading the Word About Inquiry-Based Math

By Kelly Field October 22, 2017
“It’s OK to be stuck,” Stan Yoshinobu emphasizes in his syllabi. Growth is based “on error recovery, not mistake avoidance.”
“It’s OK to be stuck,” Stan Yoshinobu emphasizes in his syllabi. Growth is based “on error recovery, not mistake avoidance.”Courtesy of Stan Yoshinobu

S tan Yoshinobu didn’t invent inquiry-based learning, a method of instruction that replaces the time-honored lecture with student-led presentations and group work. That credit goes to the late mathematician Robert Lee Moore, who taught at the University of Texas from 1920 to 1969.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

S tan Yoshinobu didn’t invent inquiry-based learning, a method of instruction that replaces the time-honored lecture with student-led presentations and group work. That credit goes to the late mathematician Robert Lee Moore, who taught at the University of Texas from 1920 to 1969.

What Mr. Yoshinobu, a math professor at California Polytechnic State University at San Luis Obispo, has done is to democratize the inquiry-based method. Over the course of a decade, he has convinced hundreds of fellow mathematicians that the strict “Moore method” can be adapted to any classroom context. (While Moore’s legacy has been tarnished by racist attitudes he held toward black students, his contributions to mathematics remain intact.)

On his own, and now as a co-director of the Academy of Inquiry Based Learning, Mr. Yoshinobu has run a series of workshops that guide professors in undergraduate math courses through the process of converting from lectures to an inquiry-based format. But he doesn’t insist on a complete overhaul, allowing participants to adopt what works for them.

Innovators Cover for Package revised.jpg
Innovators: 10 Classroom Trailblazers
Meet some devoted faculty members who might spark your interest in taking risks and trying new things in class.
  • Commentary: A Newer Education for Our Era
  • Dahpon Ho Brings History Alive
  • Catherine Shoulders Shows How an Expert’s Opinion Unfolds

“Stan has been a key figure in helping people see this as a continuum,” says Sandra Laursen, a researcher at the University of Colorado at Boulder, who has studied student outcomes in inquiry-based courses. “The ‘big tent’ is what we talk about now,” she says.

In inquiry-based classrooms, students learn not by listening but by doing, working through problems in a collaborative atmosphere that encourages risk-taking. They are the team, and the professor is the coach, guiding students to their own answers rather than presenting them with the solutions.

That’s a major shift from the traditional mathematics classroom, where the professor lectures and the students absorb the information and attempt to apply it afterward.

It’s not an easy pivot for instructors to make. To convert to the inquiry-based approach, they must transform not only the way they teach but also the way they evaluate students. They must redesign their syllabi and choose new textbooks or create materials to supplement the required reading. Remaking a single course can take a couple of hundred hours, says Mr. Yoshinobu.

B ut there is evidence that the effort can pay off, particularly for female students. Research by Ms. Laursen and others has found that inquiry-based courses increase women’s confidence in their mathematical abilities, leveling the playing field between the sexes. Much of the change is attitudinal — women aren’t actually performing worse in traditional math courses; they just think they are.

Research has found that inquiry-based courses increase women’s confidence in their abilities.

Some of that increased confidence may stem from efforts by Mr. Yoshinobu and other advocates of inquiry-based learning to destigmatize mistakes. In his syllabi, Mr. Yoshinobu emphasizes that “it’s OK to be stuck,” and that growth is based “on error recovery, not mistake avoidance.” Five percent of the grade in his course for prospective elementary-school teachers is based on “productive failure.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Still, getting students to embrace a new way of learning can be a challenge. Many college students, accustomed to professors’ telling them how to solve a problem, don’t appreciate being told to figure it out themselves.

Mike Ion, who was introduced to the inquiry-based method as a sophomore in one of Mr. Yoshinobu’s courses, says he saw some initial pushback from his classmates. But as the course progressed, he says, “people got used to it.”

“IBL made me finally critically think about why things were happening,” says Mr. Ion, who is now pursuing a Ph.D. in math education at the University of Michigan. “I felt like for the first time I was thinking for myself.”

Mr. Yoshinobu was trained under traditional lecture methods and taught that way himself early in his career. But when he discovered that his students weren’t grasping deeper math concepts, he decided to try a different approach. He went to a conference on inquiry-based learning, found a mentor, and redesigned an upper-level math course. “When I saw how students were waking up and asking better questions,” he says, he became a convert.

ADVERTISEMENT

He organized the first IBL workshop for undergraduate-math instructors in 2006 and has helped run or plan a dozen workshops since then. Close to 400 professors have attended the workshops.

Sean Sather-Wagstaff, an associate professor of mathematical sciences at Clemson University, is one of them. Long intrigued by the learning method, he had tried a version of it at a previous institution, with some success.

But when his experiment in “do it yourself IBL” failed at Clemson, he decided to seek professional help. He spent a week at one of Mr. Yoshinobu’s workshops this past summer mapping out a plan to remake an abstract algebra course. His goal is to limit lectures to just five minutes per month.

“That’s a scary thing to do, and it’s a scary thing to ask students to do if they’ve never done it before,” he says. “It’s not a complete paradigm shift, but it’s as close as you can get.” The workshop, he says, gave him the skills and the confidence “to try it again.”

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s a risk not everyone is willing to take. While there’s a growing consensus that students benefit from active learning, many faculty members in mathematics remain attached to the lecture.

Mr. Yoshinobu acknowledges this resistance but says the profession is moving — if slowly. In an effort to change more minds, he’s creating regional consortia of inquiry-based-learning advocates and training fellow converts to lead workshops. And he’s willing to be patient.

“Fundamentally, teaching is a cultural activity,” he says. “To change it is going to take a long time.”


More on Teaching and Learning

photo_83234_widescreen_850x530

The Making of a Teaching Evangelist

Premium

How Eric Mazur came to realize that the traditional classroom lecture had to go.

photo_77692_widescreen_850x530

The Case for a New Kind of Core

Premium

A methods-based curriculum could empower students in college and for life.

A version of this article appeared in the October 27, 2017, issue.
Read other items in Innovators: 10 Classroom Trailblazers.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Kelly Field
Kelly Field joined The Chronicle of Higher Education in 2004 and covered federal higher-education policy. She continues to write for The Chronicle on a freelance basis.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

4-Part Plan Seeks to Fix Mathematics Education
Math Gets a Makeover
The Tough Road to Better Science Teaching

More News

Conti-0127
Finance
Here’s What Republicans’ Proposed College-Endowment Tax Could Look Like
Illustration of a magnifying glass highlighting the phrase "including the requirements set forth in Presidential Executive Order 14168 titled Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government."
The Fine Print
The NIH Is Requiring Grantees to Follow Trump’s Anti-Trans Executive Order
New York City police arrested dozens of Pro-Palestinian protesters on Columbia University on Wednesday evening after they took over part of a central library in New York, USA on May 7, 2025.
'A Different Playbook'
Facing New Protests and Political Pressure, Colleges Are Taking a Harder Line
President of Haverford College Wendy Raymond (L) and President of DePaul University Robert Manuel (R) testify during a hearing before the House Education and Workforce Committee at the Rayburn House Office Building on May 7, 2025 in Washington, DC.
Leadership
Under Republicans’ Scrutiny, College Presidents Apologize for Their Handling of Campus Antisemitism

From The Review

Illustration showing two men and giant books, split into two sides—one blue and one red. The two men are reaching across the center color devide to shake hands.
The Review | Opinion
Left and Right Agree: Higher Ed Needs to Change
By Michael W. Clune
University of British Columbia president and vice-chancellor Santa Ono pauses while speaking during a memorandum of understanding  signing ceremony between the Tsilhqot'in National Government and UBC, in Vancouver, British Columbia, on Dec. 8, 2021.
The Review | Opinion
Santa Ono Flees for Florida
By Silke-Maria Weineck
GarciaBudgets-0430.jpg
The Review | Opinion
A Looming Crisis for Public Colleges
By Tanya I. Garcia

Upcoming Events

Plain_USF_AIWorkForce_VF.png
New Academic Programs for an AI-Driven Work Force
Cincy_Plain.png
Hands-On Career Preparation
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin