Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Finance

Stanford’s Divestment From Coal Could Be a Game-Changer

By Lee Gardner May 7, 2014

Stanford University announced on Tuesday that it would no longer make direct investments in coal companies.

The university’s Board of Trustees convened for a special vote to adopt a recommendation from a panel of students, faculty and staff members, and alumni that had spent the last several months reviewing the social and environmental implications of investment in fossil fuels.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Stanford University announced on Tuesday that it would no longer make direct investments in coal companies.

The university’s Board of Trustees convened for a special vote to adopt a recommendation from a panel of students, faculty and staff members, and alumni that had spent the last several months reviewing the social and environmental implications of investment in fossil fuels.

The panel’s recommendation to divest from “publicly traded companies whose principal business is the mining of coal for use in energy generation,” according to a press release, makes Stanford the most prominent American university to take such a step.

But the board’s decision also reflects the nuanced approach with which colleges are increasingly parsing the challenge of meeting student and faculty demands, fulfilling social and institutional mandates, and maintaining fiscal responsibility when it comes to divestment from controversial industries.

John L. Hennessy, Stanford’s president, said in a written statement that moving away from coal investments was a “small but constructive step” for the university to take in its efforts toward larger energy solutions.

“Stanford has a responsibility as a global citizen to promote sustainability for our planet, and we work intensively to do so through our research, our educational programs, and our campus operations,” Mr. Hennessy said. “The university’s review has concluded that coal is one of the most carbon-intensive methods of energy generation and that other sources can be readily substituted for it.”

According to data from the 2013 Nacubo-Commonfund Study of Endowments, Stanford’s $18.69-billion endowment was the fourth-largest among colleges and universities in North America. Stanford does not disclose details of its holdings.

Krishna Dasaratha, a Ph.D. student in mathematics at the university who is a member of the student group Fossil Free Stanford, called the board’s decision “fantastic,” and added that he and his fellow advocates were “very proud of the university for being one of the first schools to divest in coal.”

“We think this is a necessary and important step in fighting climate change,” Mr. Dasaratha said.

But he noted that Fossil Free Stanford had originally called for the university to divest from both coal and oil companies. Asked if he considered the move the institution announced on Tuesday a half-step in some respects, he said, “You could say that.”

Other Campaigns

Fossil-fuel divestment campaigns have sprung up on hundreds of campuses across the country in recent years, but have met with limited success. Institutions such as Unity and Pitzer Colleges have divested from fossil fuels. Bowdoin College and Brown and Harvard Universities, among others, have declined to.

ADVERTISEMENT

Mr. Dasaratha was a veteran of the fossil-fuel divestment campaign at Harvard as an undergraduate there before he came to Stanford last year, and he was among the students and faculty members who petitioned Stanford’s board to divest this past fall.

The petition was passed along to the university’s Advisory Panel on Investment Responsibility and Licensing, a group of faculty members, staff members, students, and alumni who report to a special committee of the Board of Trustees. Beginning in October of last year, the panel researched and considered the issue before delivering in April a recommendation to divest from coal companies. Since the board does not have a full meeting in May, it convened a special meeting on Tuesday to vote on the matter, in advance of its next scheduled meeting, in June.

“Because the issue is so important, we didn’t want to wait,” said Susan L. Weinstein, the university’s assistant vice president for business development and a member of the advisory panel. In addition, she said, Fossil Free Stanford had been “very diligent in keeping us moving forward on it, and we wanted to be responsive to their timetable as well.”

The decision to divest from coal companies, but not oil companies, came down to a consideration of the realities of current energy options and the charge of the university’s 1971 Statement of Investment Responsibility. While all fossil-fuel emissions “significantly contribute” to global climate change, Ms. Weinstein said, “there are not very many alternatives” to petroleum.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Coal, by contrast, is one of the most carbon-intensive methods of energy generation,” she said, “and we do have other less carbon-intensive alternatives"—in particular, natural gas, which burns more cleanly than coal and is currently in abundant supply.

The university’s investment guidelines state that trustees can make investment decisions when “corporate policies or practices create substantial social injury.”

“We felt that it would be hard to claim that you could just get out of the fossil-fuel business entirely,” Ms. Weinstein said, “but we did believe that there was a social benefit to moving away from coal at this point.”

Such deliberate decision-making has marked many colleges’ recent divestment debates. Pitzer College’s decision to divest from all fossil fuels, announced last month, was arrived at after a lengthy debate and much institutional soul-searching, and led to a larger commitment to sustainability at the institution.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the case of another controversial commodity, tobacco, the University of Pennsylvania’s president, Amy Gutmann, opposed a proposal this year for Penn to divest from cigarette companies because tobacco did not constitute “a moral evil"—a condition that factored into Penn’s 2006 decision to divest from oil companies operating in Sudan, in response to a genocide in Darfur.

But tobacco, Ms. Gutmann said, did not violate the university’s investing guidelines. Penn’s Board of Trustees is scheduled to vote in June on divestment from tobacco companies.

A Game-Changer?

The colleges that divested from fossil fuels before Tuesday were smaller institutions with relatively modest endowments at stake. Stanford’s international prominence and wealth make its commitment to divesting from coal a potential game-changer. Bill McKibben, founder of 350.org, an advocacy group that confronts climate change and has encouraged divestment drives at universities, praised Stanford’s decision in a written statement and added that “other forward-looking and internationally minded institutions will follow, I’m sure.”

Ms. Weinstein played down any activism in the board’s vote. Encouraging other colleges to divest “wasn’t part of our agenda,” she said. “We really made the correct decision for Stanford. It’s up to every institution to make its own decisions on these kind of issues.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Mr. Dasaratha said he was “optimistic now that Stanford has taken the lead.”

“We’ll continue our campaign,” he said, “and we’ll be continuing to address climate change, but for the moment we want to celebrate Stanford’s decision.”

Correction (5/13/2014, 5:19 p.m.): This article originally reported incorrectly that Ithaca College had divested from fossil fuels. It has not, and the article has been updated to reflect this correction.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Gardner_Lee.jpg
About the Author
Lee Gardner
Lee Gardner writes about the management of colleges and universities. Follow him on Twitter @_lee_g, or email him at lee.gardner@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Vector illustration of large open scissors  with several workers in seats dangling by white lines
Iced Out
Duke Administrators Accused of Bypassing Shared-Governance Process in Offering Buyouts
Illustration showing money being funnelled into the top of a microscope.
'A New Era'
Higher-Ed Associations Pitch an Alternative to Trump’s Cap on Research Funding
Illustration showing classical columns of various heights, each turning into a stack of coins
Endowment funds
The Nation’s Wealthiest Small Colleges Just Won a Big Tax Exemption
WASHINGTON, DISTICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES - 2025/04/14: A Pro-Palestinian demonstrator holding a sign with Release Mahmud Khalil written on it, stands in front of the ICE building while joining in a protest. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators rally in front of the ICE building, demanding freedom for Mahmoud Khalil and all those targeted for speaking out against genocide in Palestine. Protesters demand an end to U.S. complicity and solidarity with the resistance in Gaza. (Photo by Probal Rashid/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
An Anonymous Group’s List of Purported Critics of Israel Helped Steer a U.S. Crackdown on Student Activists

From The Review

John T. Scopes as he stood before the judges stand and was sentenced, July 2025.
The Review | Essay
100 Years Ago, the Scopes Monkey Trial Discovered Academic Freedom
By John K. Wilson
Vector illustration of a suited man with a pair of scissors for a tie and an American flag button on his lapel.
The Review | Opinion
A Damaging Endowment Tax Crosses the Finish Line
By Phillip Levine
University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin